• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大容积三级中心行肾脏部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的患者的种族比较。

Racial Comparison of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses at a Large Volume Tertiary Center.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1365-1371. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0655. Epub 2021 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0655
PMID:33730861
Abstract

African American (AA) race has been identified to have a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and worse renal cancer survival compared with Caucasian Americans (CA), irrespective of tumor size, pathologic type, and surgical procedure. We aimed to compare the outcomes between CA and AA patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) at our high-volume center. We queried our PN data repository from 2007 to 2017. We identified 981 cases of PN (robotic  = 943 and laparoscopic  = 38), of which there were 852 CA and 129 AA patients. We compared age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), nephrometry score, tumor size, pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), tumor characteristics, and 30-day complication rate. We then estimated the overall survival and disease-specific survival. Age, BMI, operative time, EBL, nephrometry score, tumor size, CCI, length of stay, and sex were not statistically different. The mean preoperative eGFR was higher in the AA cohort (91.4 mL/min/1.73 m 86.1 mL/min/1.73 m,  = 0.007); however, at 1 year, there was no mean difference (76.8 mL/min/1.73 m 74.5 mL/min/1.73 m,  = 0.428). There was a higher percentage of Fuhrman Grade 3/4 in the AA cohort (33.3% 22.5%,  = 0.044). The AA cohort had a 2.66 × higher incidence of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (34.9% 13.1%,  < 0.001) and unclassified RCC (3.9% 0.4%,  = 0.001). There was no difference in tumor stage ( = 0.260) or incidence of benign histology (15.3% 11.6%,  = 0.278). There were no differences in 30-day complications ( = 0.330). The median follow-up was 43.2 months. By using Kaplan-Meier curves, there was no observed difference in overall survival ( = 0.752) or disease-free survival ( = 0.403). Our cohort of AA and CA patients with intermediate follow-up showed no worse outcomes for CKD or survival when undergoing laparoscopic or robotic PN. For low-stage renal cancer, there was no difference in overall survival and disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 43.2 months among AA patients, despite having higher grade tumors and a higher percentage of unclassified RCC. Our cohort of AA patients did have a higher incidence of papillary RCC. The equivalent overall survival and disease-free survival could be due to the earlier discovery of lower stage renal masses incidentally identified on imaging studies performed equally for other reasons in both AA and CA patients.

摘要

非裔美国人(AA)种族的慢性肾脏病(CKD)发病率和肾癌生存预后均较白种人(CA)差,与肿瘤大小、病理类型和手术方式无关。我们旨在比较我们高容量中心接受微创部分肾切除术(PN)的 CA 和 AA 患者的结果。我们从 2007 年到 2017 年查询了我们的 PN 数据存储库。我们确定了 981 例 PN(机器人手术=943 例,腹腔镜手术=38 例),其中有 852 例 CA 和 129 例 AA 患者。我们比较了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、肾肿瘤评分、肿瘤大小、术前和术后估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、住院时间、Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、肿瘤特征和 30 天并发症发生率。然后,我们估计了总体生存率和疾病特异性生存率。年龄、BMI、手术时间、EBL、肾肿瘤评分、肿瘤大小、CCI、住院时间和性别无统计学差异。AA 组的平均术前 eGFR 较高(91.4ml/min/1.73m 86.1ml/min/1.73m, = 0.007);然而,在 1 年时,平均差异无统计学意义(76.8ml/min/1.73m 74.5ml/min/1.73m, = 0.428)。AA 组的 Fuhrman 分级 3/4 比例较高(33.3% 22.5%, = 0.044)。AA 组的肾细胞癌(RCC)乳头状癌发生率高 2.66 倍(34.9% 13.1%, < 0.001)和未分类 RCC 发生率高 3.9 倍(3.9% 0.4%, = 0.001)。肿瘤分期无差异( = 0.260)或良性组织学发生率无差异(15.3% 11.6%, = 0.278)。30 天并发症无差异( = 0.330)。中位随访时间为 43.2 个月。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,总体生存率( = 0.752)或无病生存率( = 0.403)无观察到差异。在中等随访期间,我们的 AA 和 CA 患者队列未显示出接受腹腔镜或机器人 PN 治疗时 CKD 或生存预后恶化。对于低分期肾癌,在中位随访 43.2 个月时,AA 患者的总体生存率和无病生存率无差异,尽管他们的肿瘤分级较高,未分类 RCC 的比例较高。我们的 AA 患者队列确实有较高的乳头状 RCC 发生率。总体生存率和无病生存率相当可能是由于 AA 和 CA 患者在进行其他原因的影像学检查时,偶然发现了较低分期的肾脏肿块,因此较早发现。

相似文献

1
Racial Comparison of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses at a Large Volume Tertiary Center.大容积三级中心行肾脏部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的患者的种族比较。
J Endourol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1365-1371. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0655. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
2
Cryoablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: A Matched Group Comparative Analysis.冷冻消融与部分肾切除术治疗 T1b 期临床肾肿瘤:匹配组对比分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Racial Disparities in Histology and Short-Term Renal Functional Outcomes Following Robotic Nephron-Sparing Surgery.机器人保留肾单位手术组织学及短期肾功能结果的种族差异
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Apr;15(2):203-206. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
4
Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术 3 年后的肿瘤学和肾功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):744-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.052. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
Will the kidney function be reduced in patients with renal cell carcinoma following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Baseline eGFR, warm ischemia time, and RENAL nephrometry score could tell.腹腔镜部分肾切除术后肾细胞癌患者的肾功能会降低吗?基线估算肾小球滤过率、热缺血时间和RENAL肾计量评分可以说明这一点。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):498.e15-498.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与微创根治性肾切除术治疗临床 T2a 期肾肿瘤:来自 ROSULA(机器人治疗大肾肿瘤)协作组的倾向评分匹配比较。
BJU Int. 2020 Jul;126(1):114-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.15064. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
cT1a Renal Masses Less Than 2 versus 2 cm or Greater Managed by Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.2cm 以下与 2cm 以上 CT1a 期肾肿瘤行机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结局比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.066.
8
Comparison of progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis after partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.严重慢性肾病患者肾细胞癌行部分或根治性肾切除术后进展至需要透析的终末期肾病的比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Sep;48(9):1421-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1317-9. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Nephrometry score matched robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy.肾计量评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜与开放性肾部分切除术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):679-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0801-x. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
10
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Two Resection Techniques in a Multi-institutional Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.腹腔镜下T1期肾细胞癌部分肾切除术:多机构倾向评分匹配分析中两种切除技术的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1395-402. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4985-2. Epub 2016 Jan 4.