• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估恢复评估量表的时间变化。

Assessing the Recovery Assessment Scale Across Time.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Social Work, Indianapolis (Fukui); Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis (Salyers).

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):716-719. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000521. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.202000521
PMID:33730883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8202731/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) is one of the most used recovery measures in recovery-oriented practice evaluation of people with mental health conditions. Although its psychometric properties have been extensively studied, one critical piece of information that is missing from the literature is evidence of its longitudinal factorial invariance-that is, whether the RAS measures the same recovery construct across time. The authors empirically tested the longitudinal factorial invariance assumption for the RAS.

METHODS

Structural equation modeling was used to test the longitudinal factorial invariance of the RAS with data longitudinally obtained at three time points from 167 people with severe mental illness.

RESULTS

The longitudinal factorial invariance assumption was supported (i.e., configural, metric, partial scalar, factor variance and covariance invariance).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found empirical evidence that the RAS can measure the same recovery construct over time and thus meets one of the important prerequisites for longitudinal assessment.

摘要

目的

康复评估量表(RAS)是康复导向实践评估心理健康状况人群康复的最常用测量方法之一。尽管其心理测量特性已经得到广泛研究,但文献中缺少一个关键信息,即缺乏其纵向因子不变性的证据,也就是说,RAS 是否在跨时间测量相同的康复结构。作者通过从 167 名严重精神疾病患者处获得的三个时间点的纵向数据,实证检验了 RAS 的纵向因子不变性假设。

方法

结构方程模型用于检验 RAS 的纵向因子不变性假设,从 167 名严重精神疾病患者处获得的三个时间点的纵向数据。

结果

纵向因子不变性假设得到支持(即,组态、度量、部分标度、因子方差和协方差不变性)。

结论

本研究发现,RAS 可以随着时间测量相同的康复结构,因此满足纵向评估的一个重要前提条件。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Recovery Assessment Scale Across Time.评估恢复评估量表的时间变化。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):716-719. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000521. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Longitudinal Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Across Ages 4 to 16 in the ALSPAC Sample.《ALSPAC 样本中 4 至 16 岁儿童青少年长处与困难问卷的纵向不变性》
Assessment. 2023 Sep;30(6):1884-1894. doi: 10.1177/10731911221128948. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Psychometric assessment of the Temptations to Try Alcohol Scale.尝试饮酒诱惑量表的心理计量评估。
Addict Behav. 2011 Apr;36(4):431-3. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.12.019. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
4
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
5
Validation of the psychometric properties of cognitive fusion questionnaire. A study of the factorial validity and factorial invariance of the measure among osteoarticular disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, depressive disorder, and general populations.认知融合问卷的心理计量特性验证。在骨关节炎疾病、糖尿病、肥胖、抑郁障碍和一般人群中对该测量方法的因子有效性和因子不变性的研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;24(5):1121-1129. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2077. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
6
Prevention of smoking in Middle School Students: psychometric assessment of the Temptations to Try Smoking Scale.预防中学生吸烟:尝试吸烟诱惑量表的心理计量学评估。
Addict Behav. 2012 Apr;37(4):521-3. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
7
Psychometric assessment of the processes of change scale for sun protection.防晒措施变化过程量表的心理评估。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jan;23(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1325504. Epub 2017 May 7.
8
Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).评估心理体验社区评估量表(CAPE)在跨国间的不变性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2600-2607. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003574. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Factorial invariance of pediatric patient self-reported fatigue across age and gender: a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis approach utilizing the PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale.多群组验证性因子分析方法利用 PedsQL™多维疲劳量表分析儿科患者自我报告疲劳在年龄和性别上的因子不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2581-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0370-4. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in French Canadian Young Adults.法裔加拿大青年心理健康连续体简表的心理测量学评估
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;62(4):286-294. doi: 10.1177/0706743716675855. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond symptom improvement: transdiagnostic and disorder-specific ways to assess functional and quality of life outcomes across mental disorders in adults.超越症状改善:评估成人精神障碍患者功能和生活质量结果的跨诊断及特定障碍方法。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):296-318. doi: 10.1002/wps.21338.
2
Supporting Unhealthy Substance use care Through a whole person Approach and user centered INtegration into primary care (SUSTAIN): Study protocol for a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.通过全人方法和以用户为中心融入初级保健来支持不健康物质使用护理(SUSTAIN):一项2型混合有效性-实施试验的研究方案
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Apr;171:209626. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209626. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Personal Recovery Among Service Users Compared With Siblings and a Control Group: A Critical Note on Recovery Assessment.服务使用者与兄弟姐妹和对照组之间的个人康复比较:关于康复评估的重要说明。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Dec 1;70(12):1123-1129. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900049. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.精神疾病中个人康复的概念化、评估和意义:系统评价和荟萃分析的范围综述。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Jun;42(2):169-181. doi: 10.1037/prj0000356. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Factor Structure and Sensitivity to Change of the Recovery Assessment Scale.
Changes in Recovery Assessment Scale Scores During a Treatment Episode Among Patients in a Large Behavioral Health Care System.
大型行为健康护理系统中患者治疗期间康复评估量表分数的变化。
Psychiatr Serv. 2025 May 1;76(5):506-510. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240187. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
4
Depression, anxiety, and personal recovery outcomes after group vs individual transdiagnostic therapy: a brief report.团体与个体跨诊断治疗后抑郁、焦虑和个人康复结果:简要报告。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55093-7.
5
Reducing wait times and avoiding unnecessary use of high-cost mental health services through a Rapid Access and Stabilization Program: protocol for a program evaluation study.通过快速通道和稳定化计划减少等待时间并避免不必要地使用高成本精神卫生服务:一项方案评估研究的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10697-7.
康复评估量表的因子结构及对变化的敏感性
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;45(4):690-699. doi: 10.1007/s11414-017-9563-x.
4
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Consumer Outcomes After Implementing CommonGround as an Approach to Shared Decision Making.将“共同基础”作为共享决策方法实施后的消费者结果
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Mar 1;68(3):299-302. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500468. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
6
A Tipping Point for Measurement-Based Care.基于测量的护理的转折点。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):179-188. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500439. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Advancing recovery science: reliability and validity properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale.推进康复科学:康复评估量表的信度和效度特性
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):442-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300089.
8
Instruments for measuring mental health recovery: a systematic review.测量心理健康康复的工具:系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Dec;33(8):1082-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
9
Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one.为何项目与包裹之争并非不可调和。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Sep;18(3):285-300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services.评估现有康复措施在澳大利亚精神卫生服务中的常规使用价值。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;45(4):267-80. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2010.549996. Epub 2011 Feb 11.