• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病的成功代谢控制取决于个体的神经经济学和健康风险承担决策内表型:个性化护理的新靶点。

Successful metabolic control in diabetes type 1 depends on individual neuroeconomic and health risk-taking decision endophenotypes: a new target in personalized care.

作者信息

Jorge Helena, Duarte Isabel C, Correia Bárbara R, Barros Luísa, Relvas Ana Paula, Castelo-Branco Miguel

机构信息

PIDFIF* and Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, CIBIT/ICNAS, University of Coimbra, Coimbra-Lisboa, Portugal.

Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, CIBIT/ICNAS, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 18;52(15):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000386.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291721000386
PMID:33731230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9772909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurobehavioral decision profiles have often been neglected in chronic diseases despite their direct impact on major public health issues such as treatment adherence. This remains a major concern in diabetes, despite intensive efforts and public awareness initiatives regarding its complications. We hypothesized that high rates of low adherence are related to risk-taking profiles associated with decision-making phenotypes. If this hypothesis is correct, it should be possible to define these endophenotypes independently based both on dynamic measures of metabolic control (HbA1C) and multidimensional behavioral profiles.

METHODS

In this study, 91 participants with early-stage type 1 diabetes fulfilled a battery of self-reported real-world risk behaviors and they performed an experimental task, the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).

RESULTS

K-means and two-step cluster analysis suggest a two-cluster solution providing information of distinct decision profiles (concerning multiple domains of risk-taking behavior) which almost perfectly match the biological partition, based on the division between stable or improving metabolic control (MC, N = 49) v. unstably high or deteriorating states (NoMC, N = 42). This surprising dichotomy of behavioral phenotypes predicted by the dynamics of HbA1C was further corroborated by standard statistical testing. Finally, the BART game enabled to identify groups differences in feedback learning and consequent behavioral choices under ambiguity, showing distinct group choice behavioral patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that distinct biobehavioral endophenotypes can be related to the success of metabolic control. These findings also have strong implications for programs to improve patient adherence, directly addressing risk-taking profiles.

摘要

背景

尽管神经行为决策特征对诸如治疗依从性等重大公共卫生问题有直接影响,但在慢性疾病中常常被忽视。在糖尿病领域,这仍是一个主要问题,尽管人们为其并发症付出了巨大努力并开展了公众意识提升活动。我们推测,低依从率较高与决策表型相关的冒险特征有关。如果这一假设正确,那么应该能够基于代谢控制的动态指标(糖化血红蛋白)和多维度行为特征独立定义这些内表型。

方法

在本研究中,91名1型糖尿病早期患者完成了一系列自我报告的现实世界风险行为调查,并进行了一项实验任务——气球模拟风险任务(BART)。

结果

K均值聚类和两步聚类分析表明,基于稳定或改善的代谢控制(MC,N = 49)与不稳定的高代谢或代谢恶化状态(NoMC,N = 42)的划分,存在一个双聚类解决方案,该方案提供了不同决策特征(涉及冒险行为的多个领域)的信息,几乎与生物学划分完美匹配。糖化血红蛋白动态预测的这种行为表型的惊人二分法通过标准统计检验得到了进一步证实。最后,BART游戏能够识别在反馈学习以及在模糊情况下随之产生的行为选择方面的组间差异,显示出不同的组选择行为模式。

结论

这些发现表明,不同的生物行为内表型可能与代谢控制的成功与否相关。这些发现对旨在提高患者依从性、直接针对冒险特征的项目也具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b61/9772909/ac0a4baeb966/S0033291721000386_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b61/9772909/82eefa911607/S0033291721000386_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b61/9772909/ac0a4baeb966/S0033291721000386_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b61/9772909/82eefa911607/S0033291721000386_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b61/9772909/ac0a4baeb966/S0033291721000386_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Successful metabolic control in diabetes type 1 depends on individual neuroeconomic and health risk-taking decision endophenotypes: a new target in personalized care.1型糖尿病的成功代谢控制取决于个体的神经经济学和健康风险承担决策内表型:个性化护理的新靶点。
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 18;52(15):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000386.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Trust-Based Decision-Making in the Health Context Discriminates Biological Risk Profiles in Type 1 Diabetes.健康背景下基于信任的决策会区分1型糖尿病的生物风险特征。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 28;12(8):1236. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081236.
4
5
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
6
Differences in neural activation as a function of risk-taking task parameters.作为风险决策任务参数的函数的神经激活的差异。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Sep 30;7:173. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00173. eCollection 2013.
7
The Implicit Sexual Risk Assessment: A Pilot Study of a Novel Behavioral Task.内隐性行为风险评估:一项新型行为任务的初步研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2921-2929. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02092-8. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
8
Abnormal Responses in Cognitive Impulsivity Circuits Are Associated with Glycosylated Hemoglobin Trajectories in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Metabolic Control.1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳与认知冲动回路中的异常反应有关,这种异常反应与糖化血红蛋白轨迹有关。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Nov;46(6):866-878. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0307. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
9
Relationship between virtual reality balloon analogue risk task and risky decision-making.虚拟现实气球模拟风险任务与冒险决策之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0282097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282097. eCollection 2023.
10
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.神枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡1:精英运动员在身体表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:291-316. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Translational neuroeconomic approach: from economic decision making to neuropsychological disorders.社论:转化神经经济学方法:从经济决策到神经心理障碍
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 21;16:1546863. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1546863. eCollection 2025.
2
Trust-based health decision-making recruits the neural interoceptive saliency network which relates to temporal trajectories of Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Type 1.基于信任的健康决策会激活神经内感受显著性网络,该网络与1型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的时间轨迹相关。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Feb;18(1):171-183. doi: 10.1007/s11682-023-00816-z. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Trust-Based Decision-Making in the Health Context Discriminates Biological Risk Profiles in Type 1 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsivity across reactive, proactive and cognitive domains in Parkinson's disease on dopaminergic medication: Evidence for multiple domain impairment.帕金森病患者在多巴胺药物治疗下反应性、前瞻性和认知领域的冲动性:多领域损伤的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0210880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210880. eCollection 2019.
2
Decision Making Deficits in Relation to Food Cues Influence Obesity: A Triadic Neural Model of Problematic Eating.与食物线索相关的决策缺陷影响肥胖:问题性饮食的三元神经模型
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 14;9:264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00264. eCollection 2018.
3
Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior.
健康背景下基于信任的决策会区分1型糖尿病的生物风险特征。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 28;12(8):1236. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081236.
4
Abnormal Responses in Cognitive Impulsivity Circuits Are Associated with Glycosylated Hemoglobin Trajectories in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Metabolic Control.1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳与认知冲动回路中的异常反应有关,这种异常反应与糖化血红蛋白轨迹有关。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Nov;46(6):866-878. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0307. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
对模糊不确定性的容忍度预测亲社会行为。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 12;9(1):2156. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04631-9.
4
Reduced loss aversion in pathological gambling and alcohol dependence is associated with differential alterations in amygdala and prefrontal functioning.病理性赌博和酒精依赖中损失厌恶感降低与杏仁核和前额叶功能的差异改变有关。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 24;7(1):16306. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16433-y.
5
A Theory of Unconscious Thought.无意识思维理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):95-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x.
6
Adopting the sensemaking perspective for chronic disease self-management.采用意义建构视角进行慢性病自我管理。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:406-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
7
Further evidence of a dissociation between decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in obsessive-compulsive disorder.进一步的证据表明,在强迫症中,模糊条件下的决策和风险条件下的决策之间存在分离。
J Affect Disord. 2015 May 1;176:118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.060. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
Understanding the Hows and Whys of Decision-Making: From Expected Utility to Divisive Normalization.理解决策的方式与原因:从预期效用到分裂归一化
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2014;79:169-76. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2014.79.024778. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.时间折扣能解释不健康行为吗?一项系统综述及强化学习视角
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
10
Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.用于统计分析的正态性检验:非统计学家指南。
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. Epub 2012 Apr 20.