Suppr超能文献

戒酒康复之家的房屋经理职责

House Manager Roles in Sober Living Houses.

作者信息

Polcin Douglas L, Mahoney Elizabeth, Mericle Amy A

机构信息

Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California.

Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California.

出版信息

J Subst Use. 2021;26(2):151-155. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1789230. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol and drug treatment providers are increasingly emphasizing the role of long-term, community-based systems of care. A good example is Sober Living Houses (SLHs), which are peer operated alcohol- and drug-free living environments. Studies show residents of SLHs make significant improvements in multiple areas. However, little attention has been devoted to describing the critically important role of SLH managers who oversee these homes.

METHODS

Thirty-five SLH managers completed interviews about the characteristics and operations of their houses, their activities as managers, and ways their own recovery was affected by their work.

RESULTS

Managers reported widespread use of some but not all principles of social model recovery. Manager roles varied dramatically in terms of time spent managing houses, activities related to their roles, and training they received. Some reported extensive amounts of time proving support to residents, while others viewed their role as primarily administrative.

CONCLUSIONS

Research is needed to understand reasons for manager differences, optimal manager functioning, and manager training needs. Research is also needed to assess whether different house characteristics require different manager roles.

摘要

背景

酒精和药物治疗服务提供者越来越强调长期的、基于社区的护理系统的作用。一个很好的例子是清醒生活之家(SLHs),它们是由同伴运营的无酒精和无毒品生活环境。研究表明,清醒生活之家的居民在多个方面有显著改善。然而,很少有人关注描述监督这些住所的清醒生活之家管理人员的至关重要的作用。

方法

35名清醒生活之家管理人员完成了关于他们住所的特征和运营、他们作为管理人员的活动以及他们自己的康复如何受到工作影响的访谈。

结果

管理人员报告说,他们广泛使用了社会模式康复的一些但不是所有原则。管理人员的角色在管理住所的时间、与其角色相关的活动以及他们接受的培训方面有很大差异。一些人报告说花费大量时间为居民提供支持,而另一些人则认为他们的角色主要是行政性的。

结论

需要进行研究以了解管理人员差异的原因、最佳管理人员职能和管理人员培训需求。还需要进行研究以评估不同的住所特征是否需要不同的管理人员角色。

相似文献

1
House Manager Roles in Sober Living Houses.
J Subst Use. 2021;26(2):151-155. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1789230. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: Associations with length of stay.
J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;49(7):2959-2971. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22620. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Cannabis use and alcohol and drug outcomes in a longitudinal sample of sober living house residents in California.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Oct;165:209454. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209454. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Motivation to maintain sobriety among residents of sober living recovery homes.
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2015 Sep 11;6:103-11. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S89361. eCollection 2015.
6
Community Context of Sober Living Houses.
Addict Res Theory. 2012 Dec 1;20(6):480-491. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2012.665967.
7
Moving Social Model Recovery Forward: Recent Research on Sober Living Houses.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(2):173-186. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2167528. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
8
Outcomes Among Sober Living House Residents Who Relapse: Role of Recovery Capital.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2024 Jul-Aug;56(3):433-441. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2023.2225502. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
The Evolution of Peer Run Sober Housing as a Recovery Resource for California Communities.
Int J Self Help Self Care. 2014;8(2):157-187. doi: 10.2190/SH.8.2.c.
10
Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery housing and on-the-ground research priorities: a scoping study through the lens of community based participatory research.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 22;13:1554344. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1554344. eCollection 2025.
2
Giving and Receiving Help among Persons Entering Sober Living Houses.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(4):488-503. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2242801. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Moving Social Model Recovery Forward: Recent Research on Sober Living Houses.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2023;41(2):173-186. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2167528. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Measuring Architecture in Recovery Homes: Recovery Home Architecture Scale.
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(1):103-110. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2148484. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Recovery Home Environment Characteristics Associated with Recovery Capital.
J Drug Issues. 2020 Apr 1;51(2):253-267. doi: 10.1177/0022042620978393. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
6
Resident and house manager perceptions of social environments in sober living houses: Associations with length of stay.
J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;49(7):2959-2971. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22620. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Home Environment Scale.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(8):1161-1168. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1910710. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Understanding challenges for recovery homes during COVID-19.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jul;93:102986. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102986. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) for Persons on Probation or Parole Entering Sober Living Houses.
Crim Justice Behav. 2018;45(11):1634-1659. doi: 10.1177/0093854818784099. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Role of recovery residences in criminal justice reform.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Mar;53:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
4
Housing Status, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Substance Abuse Outcomes Among Sober Living House Residents over 18 Months.
Addict Disord Their Treat. 2017 Sep;16(3):138-150. doi: 10.1097/ADT.0000000000000105.
5
The Evolution of Peer Run Sober Housing as a Recovery Resource for California Communities.
Int J Self Help Self Care. 2014;8(2):157-187. doi: 10.2190/SH.8.2.c.
6
Maximizing social model principles in residential recovery settings.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):436-43. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.960112.
7
The Setting is the Service: How the Architecture of Sober Living Residences Supports Community Based Recovery.
Int J Self Help Self Care. 2014 Jul 1;8(2):189-225. doi: 10.2190/SH.8.2.d.
8
What did we learn from our study on sober living houses and where do we go from here?
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2010 Dec;42(4):425-33. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2010.10400705.
9
Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38(4):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验