Rolfes Tobias
IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 25;12:609027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609027. eCollection 2021.
This brief research report presents an experiment investigating how people interpret quantities displayed in pictorial charts. Pictorial charts are a popular form of data visualization in media. They represent different quantities with differently scaled pictures. In the present study, 63 university students answered a 12-item questionnaire containing three different pictorial charts. The study aimed to evaluate how individuals perceive the quantities in the pictorial charts intuitively. Therefore, the students' answers were not rated as correct or incorrect. Instead, it was analyzed which functional relationship between scale factor and estimated quantity best described people's interpretation of pictorial charts. The experiment showed that, on average, a model assuming a quadratic relationship fitted best. This result deviates from research that found an overgeneralization of linearity when students compare the areas of two mathematically similar shapes. It may be that the routines for the interpretation of pictures differ considerably depending on whether a person must calculate a quantity arithmetically or is prompted to estimate the quantity based on visual perception.
这份简短的研究报告展示了一项实验,该实验探究了人们如何解读以图表形式呈现的数量信息。图表是媒体中一种流行的数据可视化形式。它们用比例不同的图片来表示不同的数量。在本研究中,63名大学生回答了一份包含三个不同图表的12项问卷。该研究旨在评估个体如何直观地感知图表中的数量。因此,学生的答案没有被评定为正确或错误。相反,研究分析了比例因子与估计数量之间的哪种函数关系最能描述人们对图表的解读。实验表明,平均而言,假设为二次关系的模型拟合效果最佳。这一结果与另一项研究不同,那项研究发现当学生比较两个数学上相似形状的面积时,存在线性关系的过度泛化现象。可能是因为根据一个人是必须通过算术计算数量还是被促使基于视觉感知来估计数量,解读图片的常规方式有很大差异。