Suppr超能文献

行为分析师的错误分类:国家提供者识别码(NPIs)如何未能充分涵盖该领域的范围。

The Misclassification of Behavior Analysts: How National Provider Identifiers (NPIs) Fail to Adequately Capture the Scope of the Field.

作者信息

Dubuque Erick M, Yingling Marissa E, Allday R Allan

机构信息

Department of Special Education, Early Childhood, and Prevention Science, University of Louisville, Woodford R. & Harriett B. Porter Building, 1905 South 1st Street, Louisville, KY 40208 USA.

Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40208 USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Sep 9;14(1):214-229. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00451-w. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Abstract

To remain in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, U.S. health care providers are required to register for a National Provider Identifier (NPI). When applying for an NPI, providers must select the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Code(s) that most closely describes the services they offer. Three distinct taxonomies describe the services offered by behavior analysts. Two of these codes, the Behavior Analyst (103K00000X) and the Assistant Behavior Analyst (106E00000X) taxonomies, specify that the health care provider must hold either a certification from the Behavior Analyst Certification Board or a state-issued credential to practice behavior analysis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the concordance between health care providers who utilize these behavior-analytic NPI taxonomy classifications and health care providers who meet the credential qualifications specified in the code descriptions. Results indicated that there are potentially more than 20,000 U.S. health care providers who do not hold the behavior analyst credentials specified in the taxonomy descriptions linked to their accounts. The implications of providers being mistakenly classified as credentialed behavior analysts and credentialed assistant behavior analysts in federal data and how the field should respond are discussed.

摘要

为了遵守1996年的《健康保险流通与责任法案》,美国医疗保健提供者必须注册获得国家提供者识别码(NPI)。申请NPI时,提供者必须选择最能准确描述其提供服务的医疗保健提供者分类代码。有三种不同的分类法描述了行为分析师提供的服务。其中两个代码,即行为分析师(103K00000X)和助理行为分析师(106E00000X)分类法,规定医疗保健提供者必须持有行为分析师认证委员会颁发的认证或州颁发的行为分析执业证书。本研究的目的是调查使用这些行为分析NPI分类法的医疗保健提供者与符合代码描述中规定的证书资格的医疗保健提供者之间的一致性。结果表明,美国可能有超过20000名医疗保健提供者未持有与其账户关联的分类法描述中规定的行为分析师证书。讨论了提供者在联邦数据中被错误分类为有证书的行为分析师和有证书的助理行为分析师的影响以及该领域应如何应对。

相似文献

1
The Misclassification of Behavior Analysts: How National Provider Identifiers (NPIs) Fail to Adequately Capture the Scope of the Field.
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Sep 9;14(1):214-229. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00451-w. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
What's the Big IDEA? A Preliminary Analysis of Behavior Analysts' Self-Reported Training in and Knowledge of Federal Special Education Law.
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Feb 7;15(3):867-880. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00673-6. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
A Preliminary Assessment of the Qualities and Behaviors of Exemplary Practitioners: Perspectives From U.S.-Based Behavior Analysts.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jan 4;14(2):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00522-y. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Future Directions of Training and Fieldwork in Diversity Issues in Applied Behavior Analysis.
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Apr 8;12(4):767-776. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00349-2. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Training and certifying behavior analysts.
Behav Modif. 2002 Jan;26(1):27-48. doi: 10.1177/0145445502026001003.
9
A History of the Professional Credentialing of Applied Behavior Analysts.
Behav Anal. 2017 May 11;40(2):523-538. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0106-9. eCollection 2017 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Counting Midwives Providing Clinical Care in Nevada.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jul;40(4):1002-1006. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3921. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
2
A Survey of the State of the Field of Applied Behavior Analysis in Vermont.
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Jan 24;17(2):581-600. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00901-1. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Evaluation of a method to identify midwives in national provider identifier data.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06122-2.
4
.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 25;15(3):909-923. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00660-x. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
The National Provider Identifier Taxonomy: Does it Align With a Surgeon's Actual Clinical Practice?
J Surg Res. 2023 Feb;282:254-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Geographic Variation in the Supply of Selected Behavioral Health Providers.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6 Suppl 3):S199-S207. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.004.
4
Primary care, behavioral health, provider colocation, and rurality.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):367-74. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130260.
5
Using the National Provider Identifier for health care workforce evaluation.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Jul 30;3(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.03.b03. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验