• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使学习活动选择适应情绪稳定性和能力。

Adapting Learning Activity Selection to Emotional Stability and Competence.

作者信息

Alhathli Manal, Masthoff Judith, Beacham Nigel

机构信息

Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Vice-Rectorate of Development and Quality, Princess Nourah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2020 Mar 24;3:11. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00011. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2020.00011
PMID:33733131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861228/
Abstract

This paper investigates how humans adapt next learning activity selection (in particular the knowledge it assumes and the knowledge it teaches) to learner personality and competence to inspire an adaptive learning activity selection algorithm. First, the paper describes the investigation to produce validated materials for the main study, namely the creation and validation of learner competence statements. Next, through an empirical study, we investigate the impact on learning activity selection of learners' emotional stability and competence. Participants considered a fictional learner with a certain competence, emotional stability, recent and prior learning activities engaged in, and selected the next learning activity in terms of the knowledge it used and the knowledge it taught. Three algorithms were created to adapt the selection of learning activities' knowledge complexity to learners' personality and competence. Finally, we evaluated the algorithms through a study with teachers, resulting in an algorithm that selects learning activities with varying assumed and taught knowledge adapted to learner characteristics.

摘要

本文研究人类如何根据学习者的个性和能力来调整下一个学习活动的选择(特别是其假设的知识和传授的知识),以激发一种自适应学习活动选择算法。首先,本文描述了为主要研究生成经过验证的材料的调查,即学习者能力陈述的创建和验证。接下来,通过一项实证研究,我们调查了学习者的情绪稳定性和能力对学习活动选择的影响。参与者考虑一个具有一定能力、情绪稳定性、近期和先前参与的学习活动的虚构学习者,并根据其使用的知识和传授的知识选择下一个学习活动。创建了三种算法,以根据学习者的个性和能力调整学习活动知识复杂性的选择。最后,我们通过与教师的一项研究对算法进行了评估,得出了一种选择具有适应学习者特征的不同假设和传授知识的学习活动算法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/a209eb975d69/frai-03-00011-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/e63673eee239/frai-03-00011-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/2bacc130c9d8/frai-03-00011-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/5ebe9dd904a8/frai-03-00011-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/e76021f947f5/frai-03-00011-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/286489e4b14f/frai-03-00011-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/c033b3dfc670/frai-03-00011-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/a209eb975d69/frai-03-00011-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/e63673eee239/frai-03-00011-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/2bacc130c9d8/frai-03-00011-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/5ebe9dd904a8/frai-03-00011-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/e76021f947f5/frai-03-00011-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/286489e4b14f/frai-03-00011-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/c033b3dfc670/frai-03-00011-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9d/7861228/a209eb975d69/frai-03-00011-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Adapting Learning Activity Selection to Emotional Stability and Competence.使学习活动选择适应情绪稳定性和能力。
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Mar 24;3:11. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00011. eCollection 2020.
2
Sequencing learning experiences to engage different level learners in the workplace: An interview study with excellent clinical teachers.安排学习体验以吸引职场中不同水平的学习者:对优秀临床教师的访谈研究。
Med Teach. 2015;37(12):1090-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009431. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
3
Designing Reciprocative Dynamic Linking to improve learners' Representational Competence in interactive learning environments.设计往复动态链接以提高学习者在交互式学习环境中的表征能力。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0046-8. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
4
Physician-teacher characteristics associated with learner-centered teaching skills.与以学习者为中心的教学技能相关的医师-教师特征。
Med Teach. 2008 Jun;30(5):e137-44. doi: 10.1080/01421590801942094.
5
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
6
Evaluation of a learner-designed course for teaching health research skills in Ghana.对加纳一门由学习者设计的健康研究技能教学课程的评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jun 27;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-18.
7
Learning in Practice: A Valuation of Context in Time-Variable Medical Training.实践中的学习:时间变化的医学培训中情境的价值评估。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002070.
8
Data on learners emotional states, mental responses and fuzzy learning flows during interaction with learning environment.关于学习者在与学习环境交互过程中的情绪状态、心理反应和模糊学习流程的数据。
Data Brief. 2019 Aug 12;25:104378. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104378. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Improving skills development in residency using a deliberate-practice and learner-centered model.采用刻意练习和以学习者为中心的模式提高住院医师培训中的技能发展。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Oct;125 Suppl 8:S1-14. doi: 10.1002/lary.25434. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Personalized, assessment-based, and tiered medical education curriculum integrating treatment guidelines for atrial fibrillation.整合心房颤动治疗指南的个性化、基于评估的分层医学教育课程。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Jul;40(7):455-460. doi: 10.1002/clc.22676. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
A methodology for creating and validating psychological stories for conveying and measuring psychological traits.一种用于创建和验证心理故事以传达和测量心理特质的方法。
User Model User-adapt Interact. 2019;29(3):573-618. doi: 10.1007/s11257-019-09219-6. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.大学生学业表现的心理相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;138(2):353-87. doi: 10.1037/a0026838.
3
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
人格五因素模型与学业成绩的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.
4
A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework.一个2×2的成就目标框架。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):501-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501.
5
Personality trait structure as a human universal.作为人类共性的人格特质结构
Am Psychol. 1997 May;52(5):509-16. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509.
6
The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community.欧洲共同体中的人格五因素模型与工作绩效
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Feb;82(1):30-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.30.
7
Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: a reply to Block.人格湿地中的坚实基础:对布洛克的回应
Psychol Bull. 1995 Mar;117(2):216-20; discussion 226-9. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.216.
8
An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.五因素模型及其应用简介。
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):175-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.