• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breast cancer worry in higher-risk women offered preventive therapy: a UK multicentre prospective study.高风险女性接受预防性治疗:英国多中心前瞻性研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;188(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06183-x. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Uptake of breast cancer preventive therapy in the UK: results from a multicentre prospective survey and qualitative interviews.英国乳腺癌预防治疗的应用:一项多中心前瞻性调查和定性访谈的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):633-640. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4775-1. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Worry and risk perception of breast cancer in a prevention trial of low dose tamoxifen in midlife postmenopausal hormone users.低剂量他莫昔芬对中年绝经后激素使用者乳腺癌预防试验中的担忧与风险认知
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Cancer worries and uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A population-based survey in England.癌症担忧与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的参与情况:英格兰的一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Screen. 2019 Mar;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/0969141318796258. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Informed choice about breast cancer prevention: randomized controlled trial of an online decision aid intervention.关于乳腺癌预防的明智选择:在线决策辅助干预的随机对照试验。
Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):R74. doi: 10.1186/bcr3468.
6
Acceptability and adherence in a chemoprevention trial among women at increased risk for breast cancer attending the Modena Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center (Italy).在意大利摩德纳家族性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中心(意大利)接受治疗的乳腺癌高危女性中,一项化学预防试验的可接受性和依从性。
Breast J. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):10-21. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12045. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
Awareness of preventive medication among women at high risk for breast cancer and their willingness to consider transdermal or oral tamoxifen: a focus group study.乳腺癌高危女性对预防性药物的认知及其考虑使用经皮或口服他莫昔芬的意愿:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 9;15:878. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1893-6.
8
Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.基于人群样本的有或无家族病史女性的乳腺癌担忧及乳房X光检查使用情况
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Apr;12(4):314-20.
9
Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.对1991 - 1993年针对布拉德福德少数族裔女性进行乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的一项试点研究的评估;一种社区发展方法
Br J Cancer Suppl. 1996 Sep;29:S42-6.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

1
A Lipid-Based In Situ-Forming Hexagonal Phase for Prolonged Retention and Drug Release in the Breast Tissue.一种用于延长在乳腺组织中保留时间和药物释放的基于脂质的原位形成六方相。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2022 Sep 19;23(7):260. doi: 10.1208/s12249-022-02411-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge of Potential Harms and Benefits of Tamoxifen among Women Considering Breast Cancer Preventive Therapy.考虑行乳腺癌预防治疗的女性对他莫昔芬潜在危害和获益的认知。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Apr;13(4):411-422. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0424. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Incidence and death in 29 cancer groups in 2017 and trend analysis from 1990 to 2017 from the Global Burden of Disease Study.2017 年 29 种癌症的发病率和死亡率以及 1990 年至 2017 年的趋势分析,来自全球疾病负担研究。
J Hematol Oncol. 2019 Sep 12;12(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0783-9.
3
Beliefs About Medication and Uptake of Preventive Therapy in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Results From a Multicenter Prospective Study.关于增加乳腺癌风险女性对药物的信念和接受预防性治疗的情况:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Feb;19(1):e116-e126. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Uptake of breast cancer preventive therapy in the UK: results from a multicentre prospective survey and qualitative interviews.英国乳腺癌预防治疗的应用:一项多中心前瞻性调查和定性访谈的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):633-640. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4775-1. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
What is it about a cancer diagnosis that would worry people? A population-based survey of adults in England.癌症诊断会让人担心什么?一项基于英格兰成年人的人群调查。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 24;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3963-4.
6
NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project-1 Results: Decision Making in Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.NRG 肿瘤学/国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目决策项目-1 结果:乳腺癌风险降低决策。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Nov;10(11):625-634. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0076. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
7
A Way Forward for Cancer Chemoprevention: Think Local.癌症化学预防的前进之路:立足局部。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Jan;10(1):14-35. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0194. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Effect of decision aid for breast cancer prevention on decisional conflict in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: a multisite, randomized, controlled trial.乳腺癌预防决策辅助对携带 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的女性决策冲突的影响:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Genet Med. 2017 Mar;19(3):330-336. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.108. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
9
Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响乳腺癌化学预防药物摄取和依从性的因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):575-90. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv590. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
10
The structure and demographic correlates of cancer fear.癌症恐惧的结构及其人口统计学相关因素。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 16;14:597. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-597.

高风险女性接受预防性治疗:英国多中心前瞻性研究。

Breast cancer worry in higher-risk women offered preventive therapy: a UK multicentre prospective study.

机构信息

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Aug;188(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06183-x. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06183-x
PMID:33733302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8720078/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Women's worry about developing breast cancer may influence their decision to use preventive therapy. However, the direction of this relationship has been questioned. We prospectively investigated the relationship between breast cancer worry and uptake of preventive therapy. The socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with high breast cancer worry were also investigated.

METHODS

Women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited from clinics across England (n = 408). Participants completed a survey on their breast cancer worry, socio-demographic and clinical factors. Uptake of tamoxifen was recorded at 3 months (n = 258 women, 63.2%). Both primary and sensitivity analyses were conducted using different classifications of low, medium and high worry.

RESULTS

39.5% of respondents reported medium breast cancer worry at baseline and 21.2% reported high worry. Ethnic minority women were more likely to report high worry than white women (OR = 3.02, 95%CI 1.02, 8.91, p = 0.046). Women educated below degree level were more likely to report high worry than those with higher education (OR = 2.29, 95%CI 1.28, 4.09, p = 0.005). No statistically significant association was observed between worry and uptake. In the primary analysis, fewer respondents with medium worry at baseline initiated tamoxifen (low worry = 15.5%, medium = 13.5%, high = 15.7%). In the sensitivity analysis, participants with medium worry reported the highest uptake of tamoxifen (19.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

No association was observed between worry and uptake, although the relationship was affected by the categorisation of worry. Standardised reporting of the classification of worry is warranted to allow transparent comparisons across cohorts.

摘要

目的

女性对罹患乳腺癌的担忧可能会影响其对预防性治疗的选择。然而,这种关系的方向一直存在争议。本研究前瞻性地调查了乳腺癌担忧与预防性治疗采用率之间的关系。同时还调查了与乳腺癌高担忧相关的社会人口学和临床因素。

方法

从英国各地的诊所招募了患有乳腺癌风险增加的女性(n=408)。参与者完成了关于乳腺癌担忧、社会人口学和临床因素的调查。在 3 个月时记录了他莫昔芬的采用情况(n=258 名女性,63.2%)。采用不同的低、中、高担忧分类进行了主要和敏感性分析。

结果

39.5%的受访者在基线时报告了中度乳腺癌担忧,21.2%报告了高度担忧。少数民族女性报告高度担忧的可能性高于白人女性(OR=3.02,95%CI 1.02,8.91,p=0.046)。接受过低于学位水平教育的女性报告高度担忧的可能性高于接受过更高教育的女性(OR=2.29,95%CI 1.28,4.09,p=0.005)。担忧与采用率之间无统计学显著关联。在主要分析中,基线时中度担忧的受访者中开始服用他莫昔芬的人数较少(低担忧组为 15.5%,中担忧组为 13.5%,高担忧组为 15.7%)。在敏感性分析中,中度担忧的参与者报告了最高的他莫昔芬采用率(19.7%)。

结论

尽管担忧的分类影响了这种关系,但未观察到担忧与采用率之间存在关联。有必要对担忧的分类进行标准化报告,以允许在不同队列之间进行透明比较。