Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.
Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Kardiologiia. 2021 Mar 1;61(2):15-27. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.2.n1560.
Actuality The course of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is unpredictable. It manifests in some cases as increasing inflammation to even the onset of a cytokine storm and irreversible progression of acute respiratory syndrome, which is associated with the risk of death in patients. Thus, proactive anti-inflammatory therapy remains an open serious question in patients with COVID-19 and pneumonia, who still have signs of inflammation on days 7-9 of the disease: elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)>60 mg/dL and at least two of the four clinical signs: fever >37.5°C; persistent cough; dyspnea (RR >20 brpm) and/or reduced oxygen blood saturation <94% when breathing atmospheric air. We designed the randomized trial: COLchicine versus Ruxolitinib and Secukinumab in Open-label Prospective Randomized Trial in Patients with COVID-19 (COLORIT). We present here data comparing patients who received colchicine with those who did not receive specific anti-inflammatory therapy. Results of the comparison of colchicine, ruxolitinib, and secukinumab will be presented later.Objective Compare efficacy and safety of colchicine compared to the management of patients with COVID-19 without specific anti-inflammatory therapy.Material and Methods Initially, 20 people were expected to be randomized in the control group. However, enrollment to the control group was discontinued subsequently after the inclusion of 5 patients due to the risk of severe deterioration in the absence of anti-inflammatory treatment. Therefore, 17 patients, who had not received anti-inflammatory therapy when treated in the MSU Medical Research and Educational Center before the study, were also included in the control group. The effects were assessed on day 12 after the inclusion or at discharge if it occurred earlier than on day 12. The primary endpoint was the changes in the SHOCS-COVID score, which includes the assessment of the patient's clinical condition, CT score of the lung tissue damage, the severity of systemic inflammation (CRP changes), and the risk of thrombotic complications (D-dimer) [1].Results The median SHOCS score decreased from 8 to 2 (p = 0.017), i.e., from moderate to mild degree, in the colchicine group. The change in the SHOCS-COVID score was minimal and statistically insignificant in the control group. In patients with COVID-19 treated with colchicine, the CRP levels decreased rapidly and normalized (from 99.4 to 4.2 mg/dL, p<0.001). In the control group, the CRP levels decreased moderately and statistically insignificantly and achieved 22.8 mg/dL by the end of the follow-up period, which was still more than four times higher than normal. The most informative criterion for inflammation lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) increased in the colchicine group by 393 versus 54 in the control group (p = 0.003). After treatment, it was 60.8 in the control group, which was less than 100 considered safe in terms of systemic inflammation progression. The difference from 427 in the colchicine group was highly significant (p = 0.003).The marked and rapid decrease in the inflammation factors was accompanied in the colchicine group by the reduced need for oxygen support from 14 (66.7%) to 2 (9.5%). In the control group, the number of patients without anti-inflammatory therapy requiring oxygen support remained unchanged at 50%. There was a trend to shorter hospital stays in the group of specific anti-inflammatory therapy up to 13 days compared to 17.5 days in the control group (p = 0.079). Moreover, two patients died in the control group, and there were no fatal cases in the colchicine group. In the colchicine group, one patient had deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer elevated to 5.99 µg/mL, which resolved before discharge.Conclusions Colchicine 1 mg for 1-3 days followed by 0.5 mg/day for 14 days is effective as a proactive anti-inflammatory therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and viral pneumonia. The management of such patients without proactive anti-inflammatory therapy is likely to be unreasonable and may worsen the course of COVID-19. However, the findings should be treated with caution, given the small size of the trial.
现状 新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的病程不可预测。在某些情况下,它表现为炎症不断增加,甚至出现细胞因子风暴和急性呼吸综合征的不可逆转进展,这与患者的死亡风险相关。因此,积极的抗炎治疗仍然是 COVID-19 和肺炎患者的一个悬而未决的严重问题,这些患者在疾病的第 7-9 天仍然存在炎症迹象:C 反应蛋白(CRP)升高 >60mg/dL,且至少有以下四项临床体征中的两项:体温 >37.5°C;持续咳嗽;呼吸困难(RR >20 次/分钟)和/或在呼吸空气时血氧饱和度 <94%。我们设计了一项随机试验:COLchicine 与 Ruxolitinib 和 Secukinumab 在 COVID-19 患者开放性前瞻性随机试验(COLORIT)。我们在此处比较了接受秋水仙碱治疗的患者与未接受特定抗炎治疗的患者的数据。稍后将介绍秋水仙碱、鲁索利替尼和司库奇尤单抗的比较结果。
目的 比较秋水仙碱与 COVID-19 患者无特定抗炎治疗的管理相比的疗效和安全性。
材料和方法 最初预计将在对照组中随机分配 20 人。然而,由于在研究开始前在 MSU 医学研究和教育中心接受治疗的患者中,在没有抗炎治疗的情况下,病情严重恶化的风险,因此在纳入 5 名患者后停止了对照组的入组。因此,还将在研究开始前在 MSU 医学研究和教育中心接受治疗且未接受抗炎治疗的 17 名患者纳入对照组。在纳入或提前出院后的第 12 天评估效果。主要终点是 SHOCS-COVID 评分的变化,包括评估患者的临床状况、肺部组织损伤的 CT 评分、全身炎症的严重程度(CRP 变化)和血栓并发症的风险(D-二聚体)[1]。
结果 秋水仙碱组的 SHOCS 评分中位数从 8 分降至 2 分(p = 0.017),即从中度降至轻度。对照组的 SHOCS-COVID 评分变化极小且无统计学意义。在接受秋水仙碱治疗的 COVID-19 患者中,CRP 水平迅速下降并正常化(从 99.4 降至 4.2mg/dL,p <0.001)。在对照组中,CRP 水平适度下降且无统计学意义,随访期末达到 22.8mg/dL,仍高于正常水平四倍以上。最具信息性的炎症指标淋巴细胞与 C 反应蛋白比值(LCR)在秋水仙碱组中增加了 393,而在对照组中增加了 54(p = 0.003)。治疗后,对照组为 60.8,从炎症进展角度来看,这低于 100 被认为是安全的。与秋水仙碱组的 427 相比,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.003)。
在秋水仙碱组中,炎症因子的明显和快速下降伴随着对氧气支持的需求减少,从 14(66.7%)降至 2(9.5%)。在对照组中,需要氧气支持的无抗炎治疗患者数量保持不变,为 50%。与对照组的 17.5 天相比,接受特定抗炎治疗的患者的住院时间有缩短至 13 天的趋势(p = 0.079)。此外,对照组中有 2 例患者死亡,而秋水仙碱组中无死亡病例。秋水仙碱组中有 1 例患者出现深静脉血栓形成,D-二聚体升高至 5.99µg/mL,在出院前已得到解决。
结论 住院 COVID-19 合并病毒性肺炎患者中,秋水仙碱 1mg 连用 1-3 天,随后连用 14 天 0.5mg/d 是有效的积极抗炎治疗。不进行积极抗炎治疗的此类患者的治疗可能不合理,并且可能使 COVID-19 的病程恶化。然而,鉴于试验规模较小,应谨慎对待这些发现。