Abu Elyazed Mohamed M, Mostafa Shaimaa F
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Clin J Pain. 2021 May 1;37(5):359-365. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000932.
Postoperative pain following mastectomy is often severe and pain management is necessary. We evaluated the analgesic efficacy of continuous pectoral nerve block (PEC) in comparison with that of the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and the intravenous opioid analgesia in patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy (MRM).
A total of 90 female patients aged 20 to 70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I to III, undergoing unilateral MRM were randomly allocated into 3 groups. All patients received postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Continuous TPVB and continuous PECs were added in group II and group III, respectively. Postoperative morphine consumption during the first 48 hours and postoperative visual analog scale were recorded.
The cumulative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperative was higher in the PCA-M group (27.47±4.95 mg) than that of the TPVB group (8.43±2.67 mg) and PEC group (13.47±3.89 mg) (P<0.001, confidence interval: 16.6-21.5 and 11.6-16.4, respectively). It was significantly higher in the PEC group as compared with the TPVB group (P<0.001, confidence interval: 2.6-7.5). On admission to postanesthesia care unit till 2 hours postoperative, the median visual analog scale score at rest was higher in the PCA-M group than that of the TPVB group (P<0.05) and PEC group (P<0.05) without statistical difference between the TPVB group and PEC group.
Continuous PEC and continuous TPVB reduced the postoperative morphine consumptions as compared with the intravenous opioid analgesia in patients undergoing MRM with greater reduction in TPVB and without increased adverse effects.
乳房切除术后的疼痛通常较为严重,因此疼痛管理很有必要。我们比较了持续胸段椎旁阻滞(TPVB)、持续胸肌神经阻滞(PEC)与静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛对拟行改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)患者的镇痛效果。
总共90例年龄在20至70岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I至III级、拟行单侧MRM的女性患者被随机分为3组。所有患者术后均接受吗啡自控镇痛(PCA)。第二组和第三组分别加用持续TPVB和持续PEC。记录术后48小时内的吗啡用量及术后视觉模拟评分。
术后24小时内,PCA-M组的吗啡累积用量(27.47±4.95mg)高于TPVB组(8.43±2.67mg)和PEC组(13.47±3.89mg)(P<0.001,置信区间分别为16.6 - 21.5和11.6 - 16.4)。PEC组的吗啡累积用量显著高于TPVB组(P<0.001,置信区间为2.6 - 7.5)。在进入麻醉后恢复室至术后2小时期间,PCA-M组静息时的视觉模拟评分中位数高于TPVB组(P<0.05)和PEC组(P<0.05),TPVB组和PEC组之间无统计学差异。
与静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛相比,持续PEC和持续TPVB减少了MRM患者术后的吗啡用量,其中TPVB组减少更为明显,且未增加不良反应。