• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下胸横肌平面-胸肌神经阻滞用于改良根治性乳房切除术后的镇痛:与胸椎旁神经阻滞的比较

Ultrasound-guided transversus thoracic muscle plane-pectoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: a comparison with the thoracic paravertebral nerve block.

作者信息

Zhao Ying, Jin Weilin, Pan Peng, Feng Shuquan, Fu Danyun, Yao Junyan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.189, Chaoyang road, Yushan District, Kunshan, 215300, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.100, Haining Road, Hong Kou District, Shanghai, 200080, China.

出版信息

Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Jul 27;11(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00270-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13741-022-00270-3
PMID:35883207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is the most effective and common type of invasive surgery for breast cancer. However, it causes moderate to severe acute pain and even lasts for a long postoperative period. Transversus thoracic muscle plane-pectoral nerve block (TTP-PECS) is a novel and promising interfacial plane block which can provide analgesia for MRM while thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) is also widely used for this purpose. This study compared the postoperative analgesia between the ultrasound-guided TTP-PECS and TPVB in patients undergoing MRM.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, eighty female breast cancer patients undergoing unilateral MRM with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and axillary dissection (ALND) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided TTP-PECS (TTP-PECS group, n = 40) or TPVB (TPVB group, n = 40) with 0.5% ropivacaine 30 ml. Evaluated variables included 24 h postoperative total PCA fentanyl consumption, including PCA background consumption and PCA press consumption (per bolus dosage multiply by the effective pressing times), and intraoperative fentanyl consumption, as well as postoperative flurbiprofen axetil requirement, duration of analgesia, blocking area, pain intensity at rest and during activity, ability to reduce the inflammatory response, and the quality of recovery 40 (QoR-40) score of patients.

RESULTS

Compared with the TPVB, the main blocking area was T-T in the TTP-PECS group, which was more suitable for the MRM. TTP-PECS has a longer analgesia duration than TPVB; 24 h postoperative total PCA fentanyl consumption, especially the PCA press consumption, and the postoperative flurbiprofen axetil requirement were decreased in the TTP-PECS group than those in the TPVB group. Furthermore, the VAS scores at rest and during activity and inflammatory response were lower in the TTP-PECS group compared with the TPVB group at 12 h postoperatively. Finally, the total QoR-40 score, especially for the scores of pain; emotional state; and patient support were better in the TTP-PECS group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the TPVB, TTP-PECS can provide better postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing MRM, simultaneously reduce the inflammatory response, and prompt early recovery. These results suggest that TTP-PECS is an attractive alternative to TPVB for postoperative analgesia of modified radical mastectomy.

摘要

背景

改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)是治疗乳腺癌最有效且常见的侵入性手术方式。然而,该手术会导致中度至重度急性疼痛,甚至在术后持续较长时间。胸横肌平面 - 胸肌神经阻滞(TTP - PECS)是一种新型且有前景的界面平面阻滞技术,可为MRM提供镇痛效果,而胸段椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)也广泛用于此目的。本研究比较了超声引导下TTP - PECS和TPVB在接受MRM患者中的术后镇痛效果。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,纳入了80例接受单侧MRM并进行前哨淋巴结清扫(SLND)和腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)的女性乳腺癌患者。患者被随机分为接受超声引导下TTP - PECS组(TTP - PECS组,n = 40)或TPVB组(TPVB组,n = 40),注射0.5%罗哌卡因30 ml。评估变量包括术后24小时PCA芬太尼总消耗量,包括PCA背景消耗量和PCA按压消耗量(每次推注剂量乘以有效按压次数)、术中芬太尼消耗量、术后氟比洛芬酯需求量、镇痛持续时间、阻滞区域、静息和活动时的疼痛强度、减轻炎症反应的能力以及患者的恢复质量40(QoR - 40)评分。

结果

与TPVB组相比,TTP - PECS组的主要阻滞区域为T - T,更适合MRM手术。TTP - PECS的镇痛持续时间比TPVB长;TTP - PECS组术后24小时PCA芬太尼总消耗量,尤其是PCA按压消耗量以及术后氟比洛芬酯需求量均低于TPVB组。此外,术后12小时TTP - PECS组静息和活动时的VAS评分以及炎症反应均低于TPVB组。最后,TTP - PECS组的QoR - 40总分,尤其是疼痛、情绪状态和患者支持方面的评分更高。

结论

与TPVB相比,TTP - PECS可为接受MRM的患者提供更好的术后镇痛效果,同时减轻炎症反应并促进早期恢复。这些结果表明,TTP - PECS是改良根治性乳房切除术后镇痛替代TPVB的一种有吸引力的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/38b109c5781e/13741_2022_270_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/8e2970f8e43a/13741_2022_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/eba9c05d4665/13741_2022_270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/38f6365d137b/13741_2022_270_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/38b109c5781e/13741_2022_270_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/8e2970f8e43a/13741_2022_270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/eba9c05d4665/13741_2022_270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/38f6365d137b/13741_2022_270_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1890/9327269/38b109c5781e/13741_2022_270_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-guided transversus thoracic muscle plane-pectoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: a comparison with the thoracic paravertebral nerve block.超声引导下胸横肌平面-胸肌神经阻滞用于改良根治性乳房切除术后的镇痛:与胸椎旁神经阻滞的比较
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Jul 27;11(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00270-3.
2
Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial.胸大肌神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞在乳腺癌根治术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.
3
Efficacy of pectoral nerve block type II versus thoracic paravertebral block for analgesia in breast cancer surgery.Ⅱ型胸神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞用于乳腺癌手术镇痛的效果比较。
Klin Onkol. 2020 Summer;33(4):296-301. doi: 10.14735/amko2020296.
4
Continuous Pectoral Nerve Block Compared With Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Intravenous Opioid Analgesia for the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.连续胸神经阻滞与连续胸椎旁神经阻滞及静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛用于改良根治性乳房切除术后患者镇痛效果的前瞻性随机试验
Clin J Pain. 2021 May 1;37(5):359-365. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000932.
5
A comparative study between ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block, pectoral nerves block, and erector spinae block for pain management in cancer breast surgeries. A randomized controlled study.超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞、胸神经阻滞和竖脊肌阻滞用于乳腺癌手术疼痛管理的比较研究。一项随机对照研究。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2022 Dec;69(10):617-624. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
6
Comparison of efficacy of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block using levobupivacaine and dexamethasone for postoperative analgesia after modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled trial.左旋布比卡因联合地塞米松用于改良根治性乳房切除术后镇痛的超声引导胸神经阻滞与胸椎旁神经阻滞疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):325-331. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_25_19.
7
Analgesic efficacy and spread of local anesthetic in ultrasound-guided paravertebral, pectoralis II, and serratus anterior plane block for breast surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.超声引导下椎旁、胸大肌Ⅱ和前锯肌平面阻滞用于乳腺手术的镇痛效果及局部麻醉药扩散:一项随机对照试验。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2020 Oct-Dec;14(4):464-472. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_822_19. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Enhances the Quality of Recovery After Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下胸段椎旁阻滞提高改良根治性乳房切除术后的恢复质量:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain Res. 2021 Aug 20;14:2563-2570. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S325627. eCollection 2021.
9
[Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block combined with pectoral nerves block Ⅰ and thoracic paravertebral block in radical mastectomy].[超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞联合胸神经阻滞Ⅰ与胸椎旁神经阻滞在乳腺癌根治术中术后镇痛效果的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 20;101(27):2147-2151. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210314-00630.
10
Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.改良胸大肌神经阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌根治术后患者阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional analgesia techniques for postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后疼痛的区域镇痛技术:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD014818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014818.pub2.
2
Effects of TTP-PECS Block Under Opioid-Sparing General Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia and Early Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy.阿片类药物节省全身麻醉下TTP-PECS阻滞对改良根治性乳房切除术患者术后镇痛及早期恢复质量的影响
Pain Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):709-722. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00708-8. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
Comparing analgesic efficacy of regional blocks after modified radical mastectomy: important issues should be noticed.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of modified radical mastectomy combined with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative recurrence rate, negative emotion, and life quality of patients with breast cancer.改良根治性乳房切除术联合新辅助化疗对乳腺癌患者术后复发率、负面情绪及生活质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jan 15;14(1):460-467. eCollection 2022.
2
A randomised trial: effects of different anesthesia methods on early perioperative pain sensitivity and cellular immune function in patients undergoing radical mastectomy.一项随机试验:不同麻醉方法对乳腺癌根治术患者围手术期早期疼痛敏感性及细胞免疫功能的影响
Gland Surg. 2021 Jul;10(7):2246-2254. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-343.
3
比较改良根治性乳房切除术后区域阻滞的镇痛效果:应注意的重要问题。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 May 17;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00387-7.
The Analgesic Efficacy of Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block Combined with Pectoral Nerve Block in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
改良根治性乳腺癌手术中胸肌间沟筋膜平面阻滞联合肋间臂神经阻滞的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):485-493.
4
Interfacial Plane Blocks for Breast Surgery: Which Surgery to Block, and Which Block to Choose?用于乳腺手术的界面平面阻滞:阻滞哪种手术,选择哪种阻滞?
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1556-1558. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004413.
5
Regional Anesthesia in Cardiac Surgery: An Overview of Fascial Plane Chest Wall Blocks.心脏手术中的区域麻醉:筋膜平面胸壁阻滞概述。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):127-135. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004682.
6
Comparison of the effects of modified pectoral nerve block and erector spinae plane block on postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores of patients after radical mastectomy surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.改良胸大肌神经阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌根治术后患者阿片类药物消耗和疼痛评分影响的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
7
Impact of Regional Anesthesia on Recurrence, Metastasis, and Immune Response in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.区域麻醉对乳腺癌手术中复发、转移和免疫反应的影响:文献系统评价。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):751-756. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000662.
8
Perioperative Breast Analgesia: A Qualitative Review of Anatomy and Regional Techniques.围手术期乳房镇痛:解剖学和区域技术的定性评价。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):609-631. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000641.
9
Paravertebral Block Plus Thoracic Wall Block versus Paravertebral Block Alone for Analgesia of Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.椎旁阻滞联合胸壁阻滞与单纯椎旁阻滞用于改良根治性乳房切除术镇痛的回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0166227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166227. eCollection 2016.
10
Breast cancer intrinsic subtype classification, clinical use and future trends.乳腺癌内在亚型分类、临床应用及未来趋势。
Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;5(10):2929-43. eCollection 2015.