Suppr超能文献

用于 SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM 的快速血清学检测 - 不值得关注?

Rapid serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM - not worth attention?

机构信息

NZOZ Gemini, Żychlin, Poland (Infectious Diseases Outpatient Clinic).

Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland (Department of Infectious Diseases).

出版信息

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021 May 27;34(2):203-209. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01756. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had spread worldwide since December 2019 and became a pandemic in March 2020. The diagnosis of an active infection is based on the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from the nasopharyngeal swab specimen. The aim of the current analysis was to assess the usefulness of the rapid serological tests for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The rapid serological tests detecting IgG/IgM antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 were voluntarily performed in asymptomatic employees of 2 companies. The examination was conducted at the date and time selected online by the study participants. The testing team consisted of 2 nurses collecting the samples and 1 doctor who interpreted the results. Each positive rapid test result was verified by an RT-PCR examination from a nasopharyngeal swab. The testing kits named Vazyme: 2019-nCoV IgG/IgM Detection Kit (Colloidal Gold-Based) were provided by the employer along with the manual and certificates.

RESULTS

The overall interest in testing among employees was below the employer's expectations and reached 30% and 20% in each of the 2 companies, respectively. A total of 516 participants were included in the analysis. Ten positive results of the rapid tests were documented, including 7 for IgM and 3 for IgG antibodies. No positive result was confirmed by the detection of the genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 by the RT-PCR examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, the authors demonstrated the uselessness of rapid serological tests performed in asymptomatic volunteers for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(2):203-9.

摘要

目的

由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)引起的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)自 2019 年 12 月以来在全球范围内传播,并于 2020 年 3 月成为大流行。活动性感染的诊断基于鼻咽拭子标本的实时逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)。本分析的目的是评估快速血清学检测在诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染中的作用。

材料和方法

在 2 家公司的无症状员工中自愿进行了针对 SARS-CoV-2 的快速血清学检测。检查在研究参与者在线选择的日期和时间进行。检测小组由 2 名采集样本的护士和 1 名解释结果的医生组成。每份阳性快速检测结果均通过鼻咽拭子的 RT-PCR 检查进行验证。检测试剂盒命名为 Vazyme:2019-nCoV IgG/IgM 检测试剂盒(胶体金法),由雇主提供,附有手册和证书。

结果

员工对检测的总体兴趣低于雇主的预期,每家公司分别达到 30%和 20%。共纳入 516 名参与者进行分析。记录了 10 份快速检测阳性结果,包括 7 份 IgM 和 3 份 IgG 抗体。没有阳性结果通过 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的遗传物质得到确认。

结论

作者在此证明了在无症状志愿者中进行的快速血清学检测在诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染方面的无用性。国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志。2021;34(2):203-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验