Suppr超能文献

观点:美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的报告对2020年膳食指南咨询委员会流程的影响

Perspective: Impact of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report on the Process for the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.

作者信息

Schneeman Barbara O, Ard Jamy D, Boushey Carol J, Bailey Regan L, Novotny Rachel, Snetselaar Linda G, de Jesus Janet M, Stoody Eve E

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA (Emeritus), USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1051-1057. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab023.

Abstract

The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) recommended steps to redesign the process of developing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) are based on 5 guiding principles (enhance transparency; promote diversity of expertise and experience; support a deliberative process; manage biases and conflicts of interest; and adopt state-of-the-art processes and methods). Using these principles and recommendations, the USDA and HHS updated the process for developing the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines, including the process for appointing members and managing the work of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Modifications included having public comment on the topics and questions to be addressed by the Federal Advisory Committee, reviewing professional and financial activities on potential appointees to the committee prior to their appointment, redesigning the website to provide status updates on the work of the committee as analytical frameworks and draft conclusions were developed, strengthening the approaches for conducting systematic reviews, and adding a public meeting for discussion of the final report before its submission to the Secretaries of the USDA and HHS. Because the DGA is reviewed and updated every 5 y, it is possible to learn from each cycle what works well and where improvements in the process can be implemented. The current article illustrates, from the perspective of the advisory committee, the impact of the NASEM report on the development of the scientific report by examining changes in the process consistent with the 5 principles.

摘要

美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)建议重新设计《美国膳食指南》(DGA)制定流程的步骤基于五项指导原则(提高透明度;促进专业知识和经验的多样性;支持审议过程;管理偏见和利益冲突;采用先进的流程和方法)。美国农业部(USDA)和美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)运用这些原则和建议,更新了2020 - 2025年膳食指南的制定流程,包括任命委员会成员的流程以及管理2020年膳食指南咨询委员会的工作。修改内容包括就联邦咨询委员会要解决的主题和问题征求公众意见,在潜在委员会任命人员被任命之前审查其专业和财务活动,重新设计网站以在制定分析框架和结论草案时提供委员会工作的进展更新,加强进行系统评价的方法,并在向美国农业部和美国卫生与公众服务部部长提交最终报告之前增加一次公众会议以讨论该报告。由于膳食指南每5年进行审查和更新,因此有可能从每个周期中了解哪些方面运作良好以及流程中哪些地方可以改进。本文从咨询委员会的角度,通过审视与五项原则一致的流程变化,阐述了NASEM报告对科学报告制定的影响。

相似文献

4
Addressing misinformation about the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.解决有关《美国人膳食指南》的错误信息。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 May;119(5):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.02.034. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Setting dietary guidelines: the US process.制定饮食指南:美国的流程。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Dec;103(12 Suppl 2):S10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2003.09.031.
7
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验