• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估小儿耳鼻喉科诊所中进行预测试遗传咨询前后父母对听力损失的遗传知识。

Evaluating parental genetic knowledge of hearing loss with and without pre-test genetic counseling in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic.

机构信息

Division of Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

WellStar Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2021 Oct;30(5):1379-1387. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1404. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1404
PMID:33734538
Abstract

This study evaluated parental knowledge of genetics of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and satisfaction following pre-test consult with and without genetic counseling (GC). A survey evaluating parents' knowledge of genetics for SNHL with and without GC was administered to parents of children with SNHL who were offered genetic testing. The survey also inquired about satisfaction, and decision to pursue genetic testing. Statistical tests included Fisher-Freeman-Halton test and Mann-Whitney test. Forty-nine participants completed the survey and were seen by both otolaryngology and GC intern (ENT + GC) (n = 24) or by otolaryngology (ENT) only (n = 25). Participation groups were not randomized. There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. Participants in the ENT + GC group had higher average genetics knowledge score of 72% correct (range 22%-100%), compared to the ENT only group with 44% (range 22%-78%) (p < .001). Participants in the ENT + GC group were more likely to know the different test result possibilities (p = .002), the most common form and pathogenic variant associated with SNHL (p < .001), that only a subset of genes are evaluated (p = .004), and that genetic testing may not explain SNHL etiology (p = .013), in comparison with the ENT only group. There was no significant difference in parental satisfaction or ultimate decision to undergo testing between groups. Obtaining genetic testing plays an integral role in the diagnosis and management of SNHL in the pediatric population. Our results suggest that the addition of GC increases parent knowledge of genetics and SNHL. This knowledge allows the family to make a more informed decision as to whether or not to pursue genetic testing.

摘要

本研究评估了父母对感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)遗传的了解程度,以及在进行测试前咨询时是否有遗传咨询(GC)的满意度。对接受 SNHL 遗传检测的儿童父母进行了一项评估父母对 SNHL 遗传知识的调查,包括有和没有 GC 的情况。该调查还询问了他们的满意度和进行遗传检测的决定。统计检验包括 Fisher-Freeman-Halton 检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验。49 名参与者完成了调查,他们由耳鼻喉科和遗传咨询实习生(ENT+GC)(n=24)或仅由耳鼻喉科医生(ENT)(n=25)共同诊治。参与组没有随机分配。两组在人口统计学方面没有显著差异。在 ENT+GC 组中,参与者的平均遗传学知识得分较高,为 72%正确(范围 22%-100%),而在 ENT 组中,平均得分为 44%(范围 22%-78%)(p<0.001)。与 ENT 组相比,ENT+GC 组的参与者更有可能知道不同的测试结果可能性(p=0.002)、与 SNHL 相关的最常见形式和致病性变异(p<0.001)、只有一部分基因被评估(p=0.004),以及遗传检测可能无法解释 SNHL 病因(p=0.013)。两组间的父母满意度或最终进行检测的决定无显著差异。获取遗传检测在儿科人群 SNHL 的诊断和管理中起着不可或缺的作用。我们的结果表明,GC 的增加提高了父母对遗传学和 SNHL 的了解。这种知识使家庭能够更明智地决定是否进行遗传检测。

相似文献

1
Evaluating parental genetic knowledge of hearing loss with and without pre-test genetic counseling in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic.评估小儿耳鼻喉科诊所中进行预测试遗传咨询前后父母对听力损失的遗传知识。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Oct;30(5):1379-1387. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1404. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Impact of Genetic Testing on Hearing Interventions.遗传检测对听力干预的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Aug;133(8):1982-1986. doi: 10.1002/lary.30409. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
3
Pediatric otolaryngologists' knowledge and understanding of genetic testing for deafness.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Aug;127(8):937-40. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.8.937.
4
Value of genetic testing in the otological approach for sensorineural hearing loss.基因检测在感音神经性听力损失耳科治疗方法中的价值。
Keio J Med. 2009 Dec;58(4):216-22. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.216.
5
Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Changing Paradigm for Its Evaluation.感音神经性听力损失:其评估的不断变化的范式。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov;153(5):843-850. doi: 10.1177/0194599815596727. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Patient and Parent Decision-Making in the Setting of Chemotherapy-Induced Sensorineural Hearing Loss.化疗诱导的感觉神经性听力损失患者和家长的决策
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1684-1691. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000886.
7
Assessing parental attitudes toward genetic testing for childhood hearing loss: before and after genetic consultation.评估家长对儿童听力损失基因检测的态度:基因咨询前后
Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Jul 15;143A(14):1546-53. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31730.
8
Analysis of a cohort of children with sensory hearing loss using the SCALE systematic nomenclature.使用SCALE系统命名法对一组感音神经性听力损失儿童进行分析。
Laryngoscope. 2000 May;110(5 Pt 1):787-98. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200005000-00009.
9
Utilization of diagnostic testing for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss.小儿感音神经性听力损失的诊断测试应用
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Aug;111:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 May 22.
10
Pediatric otolaryngologists' use of genetic testing.儿科耳鼻喉科医生对基因检测的使用。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):231-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.3.231.

引用本文的文献

1
Parent experiences with genetic testing for pediatric hearing loss.家长对儿童听力损失基因检测的体验。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e1986. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1986. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Survey of patient satisfaction with genetic counseling services in Korea.韩国患者对遗传咨询服务的满意度调查。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1922. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1922. Epub 2024 May 20.