• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估个性化支持就业保真度量表的日本版的稳定有效性和可靠性:一项复制研究。

Assessing stable validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the individualized supported employment fidelity scale: A replication.

机构信息

Department of Community Mental Health & Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Faculty of Health and Social Services, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Japan.

出版信息

Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2021 Jun;41(2):248-254. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12172. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1002/npr2.12172
PMID:33734619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8340823/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Japanese version of the individualized Supported Employment Fidelity scale (JiSEF) was developed by modifying the 25-item Individual Placement and Support Fidelity Scale (IPS-25). While a preliminary study partly confirmed the concurrent validity with vocational outcomes, this replication study aimed to examine the stability of the concurrent validity and the inter-rater reliability of the JiSEF and to test its convergent validity with IPS-25.

METHODS

Fidelity assessments were conducted in 2016 (n = 17), 2017 (n = 13), and 2018 (n = 18) to examine the employment rate and the fidelity scores at the agency level. We also evaluated the fidelity scores for the IPS-25 in 2018. We examined the associations between the fidelity scale scores and vocational outcomes for the concurrent validity and between the fidelity scales for convergent validity. The inter-rater reliability was examined in the 2016 and 2017 assessments.

RESULTS

High intraclass correlation coefficients (0.93 in 2016 and 0.92 in 2017) were obtained for the inter-rater reliability. The JiSEF score in each year was associated with the agency employment rate (r = 0.710, P = 0.001 in 2016; r = 0.722, P = 0.005 in 2017; and r = 0.665, P = 0.003 in 2018). A supplementary longitudinal data analysis also confirmed the association between the JiSEF score and the employment outcomes. Additionally, the JiSEF was significantly correlated with the IPS-25 (r = 0.760, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study stably replicated good inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the JiSEF. Additionally, the convergent validity was confirmed. Further studies with large samples are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

个性化支持就业保真度量表(JiSEF)的日译本是通过修改 25 项个体安置和支持保真度量表(IPS-25)而开发的。虽然一项初步研究部分证实了与职业结果的同时效度,但本复制研究旨在检验 JiSEF 的同时效度的稳定性和评分者间信度,并检验其与 IPS-25 的收敛效度。

方法

2016 年(n=17)、2017 年(n=13)和 2018 年(n=18)进行了保真度评估,以检验机构层面的就业率和保真度得分。我们还评估了 2018 年 IPS-25 的保真度得分。我们检验了保真度量表分数与同时效度的职业结果之间的相关性,以及与收敛效度的保真度量表之间的相关性。2016 年和 2017 年的评估检验了评分者间信度。

结果

在 2016 年和 2017 年,评分者间信度的组内相关系数(0.93 和 0.92)较高。每年的 JiSEF 评分与机构就业率相关(2016 年 r=0.710,P=0.001;2017 年 r=0.722,P=0.005;2018 年 r=0.665,P=0.003)。补充的纵向数据分析也证实了 JiSEF 评分与就业结果之间的关联。此外,JiSEF 与 IPS-25 显著相关(r=0.760,P<0.001)。

结论

本研究稳定复制了 JiSEF 的良好评分者间信度和同时效度。此外,还证实了收敛效度。需要进一步进行大样本研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Assessing stable validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the individualized supported employment fidelity scale: A replication.评估个性化支持就业保真度量表的日本版的稳定有效性和可靠性:一项复制研究。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2021 Jun;41(2):248-254. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12172. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Comparative Analysis of Independent Reviewer-Rated and Self-Rated Fidelity Scores in Individual Placement and Support Programs: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys.个体安置与支持项目中独立评审员评分与自评保真度得分的比较分析:重复横断面调查
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01413-y. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Predictive Association of Low- and High-Fidelity Supported Employment Programs with Multiple Outcomes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Longitudinal Multi-site Study.真实环境下低保真和高保真支持性就业项目与多项结果的预测关联:一项前瞻性纵向多中心研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Mar;49(2):255-266. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01161-3. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
4
Development and Validation of a Japanese Fidelity Scale for Supported Employment.日本支持性就业保真度量表的开发与验证
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Mar;45(2):318-327. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0825-y.
5
Validation of the Revised Individual Placement and Support Fidelity Scale (IPS-25).修订后的个体安置和支持保真度量表(IPS-25)的验证。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Aug;63(8):758-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100476.
6
Fidelity and IPS: does quality of implementation predict vocational outcomes over time for organizations treating persons with severe mental illness in the Netherlands?忠诚度和 IPS:荷兰为严重精神疾病患者提供治疗的组织,实施质量是否能预测其职业结果的长期变化?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;55(12):1607-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01890-0. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Concurrent and predictive validity of two scales to assess the fidelity of implementation of supported employment.用于评估支持性就业实施保真度的两种量表的同时效度和预测效度。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2005 Summer;29(1):41-47. doi: 10.2975/29.2005.41.47.
8
Contents and Intensity of Services in Low- and High-Fidelity Programs for Supported Employment: Results of a Longitudinal Survey.支持性就业的低保真度和高保真度方案中的服务内容和强度:一项纵向调查的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 May 1;71(5):472-479. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900255. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Measuring Fidelity to Individual Placement and Support for Transition Age Youth: Psychometric Findings.衡量针对过渡年龄青年的个别安置与支持的保真度:心理测量结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):390-400. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01415-w. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
10
Relationship Between Self-Assessed Fidelity and Self-Reported Employment in the Individual Placement and Support Model of Supported Employment.个体安置与支持模型支持性就业中自我评估的忠诚度与自我报告的就业之间的关系。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):609-612. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700472. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Fidelity to Individual Placement and Support for Transition Age Youth: Psychometric Findings.衡量针对过渡年龄青年的个别安置与支持的保真度:心理测量结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):390-400. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01415-w. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
2
Comparative Analysis of Independent Reviewer-Rated and Self-Rated Fidelity Scores in Individual Placement and Support Programs: Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys.个体安置与支持项目中独立评审员评分与自评保真度得分的比较分析:重复横断面调查
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01413-y. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Individual placement and support: History, current status, and future directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Fidelity and IPS: does quality of implementation predict vocational outcomes over time for organizations treating persons with severe mental illness in the Netherlands?忠诚度和 IPS:荷兰为严重精神疾病患者提供治疗的组织,实施质量是否能预测其职业结果的长期变化?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;55(12):1607-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01890-0. Epub 2020 May 28.
2
Commentary on special issue on individual placement and support (IPS) international.关于个体安置和支持(IPS)国际专题的评论。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):79-82. doi: 10.1037/prj0000402. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Contents and Intensity of Services in Low- and High-Fidelity Programs for Supported Employment: Results of a Longitudinal Survey.
个体安置与支持:历史、现状及未来方向。
PCN Rep. 2023 Jul 24;2(3):e122. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.122. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Predictive Association of Low- and High-Fidelity Supported Employment Programs with Multiple Outcomes in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Longitudinal Multi-site Study.真实环境下低保真和高保真支持性就业项目与多项结果的预测关联:一项前瞻性纵向多中心研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Mar;49(2):255-266. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01161-3. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
支持性就业的低保真度和高保真度方案中的服务内容和强度:一项纵向调查的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 May 1;71(5):472-479. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900255. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Implementing the individual placement and support model of supported employment in Japan: Barriers and strategies.在日本实施个体安置和支持模式的支持性就业:障碍和策略。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):53-59. doi: 10.1037/prj0000394. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
5
A meta-regression of the impact of policy on the efficacy of individual placement and support.元回归分析政策对个体安置和支持疗效的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Mar;141(3):206-220. doi: 10.1111/acps.13129. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Assessing the Fidelity of Evidence-Based Practices: History and Current Status of a Standardized Measurement Methodology.评估循证实践的保真度:标准化测量方法的历史和现状。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Nov;47(6):874-884. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00991-6.
7
Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript.撰写或评审稿件时需要注意的 10 个常见统计学错误。
Elife. 2019 Oct 9;8:e48175. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48175.
8
Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support.支持性就业:个体安置与支持的随机对照试验的荟萃分析和综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212208. eCollection 2019.
9
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Effectiveness of supported employment in non-trial routine implementation: systematic review and meta-analysis.支持性就业在非试验常规实施中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 May;54(5):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1577-z. Epub 2018 Aug 4.