Department of Psychology.
Division of Human Resources.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Aug;26(4):350-360. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000274. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
In the current study, we extend the trait-activation theory (TAT) in order to provide context for the role of stressors in the relationship between personality and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). Specifically, we propose relationships between conflict-sensitive personality traits (social dominance orientation and hostile attributional style) and CWB, moderated by organizational stressors (interpersonal conflict and organizational constraints) as trait-relevant situational cues that signal competition. A sample of 208 matched employee-supervisor dyads was recruited from an online panel for a multiphasic study. As expected, the relationships between personality traits and supervisor-reported CWB were stronger when stressors were high compared to low, even when controlling for negative affectivity. Thus, as guided by TAT, we suggest that workplaces should minimize cues that activate CWB or attempt to use cues that constrain these behaviors, particularly when considering employees with higher levels of social dominance orientation or hostile attributional style. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在当前的研究中,我们扩展了特质激活理论(TAT),以便为压力源在人格与反生产工作行为(CWB)之间的关系中所扮演的角色提供背景。具体而言,我们提出了冲突敏感人格特质(社会支配取向和敌意归因风格)与 CWB 之间的关系,由组织压力源(人际冲突和组织约束)调节,这些压力源作为与特质相关的情境线索,表明存在竞争。从一个在线小组中招募了 208 对匹配的员工-主管进行多阶段研究。正如预期的那样,当压力源较高时,人格特质与主管报告的 CWB 之间的关系比压力源较低时更强,即使在控制了消极情感之后也是如此。因此,正如 TAT 所指导的,我们建议工作场所应尽量减少激活 CWB 的线索,或试图使用限制这些行为的线索,特别是在考虑具有较高社会支配取向或敌意归因风格的员工时。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。