Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Psicologia.
Department of Psychology.
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Aug;35(5):691-702. doi: 10.1037/fam0000700. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Despite the increase in research on coparenting, few studies have focused on non-North American or non-European families, which has hindered practice and policy targeting diverse countries. The authors used a qualitative, longitudinal, multiple case study to investigate coparenting agreement/disagreement and support/undermining, defined by Feinberg's model, in a sample of South-Brazilian families across the Transition to Parenthood (TtoP). Twelve first-time mothers and fathers (six nuclear families) of children who attended different childcare arrangements (i.e., maternal care, nanny care, and daycare center) participated in individual, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews at 6, 12, and 18 months postpartum. Deductive thematic analysis was adopted to explore and interpret the data. Similarities and singularities between families were found. Overall, agreement remained relatively stable during the first year, whereas disagreements concerning discipline demanded more parental negotiation as infants advanced toward toddlerhood. Support and undermining coexisted in the same families, although mothers and fathers expressed undermining differently. Our findings also revealed how Brazilian sociocultural aspects linked to the upbringing in the family of origin, gender role expectations, labor and financial spheres, as well as childcare arrangements, may have shaped the coparenting dynamics of the participants. This study contributes to the literature by shedding light on coparenting in South-Brazilian families. Our findings offer support to two key themes aligned with Feinberg's model of coparenting, that is agreement/disagreement and support/undermining, further reinforcing the importance of understanding coparenting in light of the families' ecological context, without disregarding singularities that mark each coparental relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管关于共同养育的研究有所增加,但很少有研究关注非北美或非欧洲的家庭,这阻碍了针对不同国家的实践和政策。作者采用定性、纵向、多案例研究的方法,在跨越生育过渡期(TtoP)的南巴西家庭样本中,按照费因伯格的模式,研究了共同养育的协议/分歧和支持/破坏。12 名首次生育的母亲和父亲(6 个核心家庭)的孩子参加了不同的育儿安排(即母婴护理、保姆护理和日托中心),他们在产后 6、12 和 18 个月接受了个体、半结构化、面对面的访谈。采用演绎主题分析来探索和解释数据。发现家庭之间存在相似性和特殊性。总体而言,第一年协议相对稳定,而在婴儿进入幼儿期时,关于纪律的分歧需要更多的父母协商。支持和破坏在同一个家庭中同时存在,尽管母亲和父亲表达的破坏方式不同。我们的研究结果还揭示了巴西社会文化方面如何与家庭出身的养育、性别角色期望、劳动和财务领域以及育儿安排联系起来,这些因素可能塑造了参与者的共同养育动态。这项研究通过阐明南巴西家庭的共同养育情况,为文献做出了贡献。我们的研究结果为与费因伯格的共同养育模式一致的两个关键主题提供了支持,即协议/分歧和支持/破坏,进一步强调了根据家庭的生态背景理解共同养育的重要性,同时也不忽视标记每个共同养育关系的特殊性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。