Suppr超能文献

多伦多脑震荡研究:社区居住成年人急性脑震荡后平衡缺陷的横断面分析。

The Toronto concussion study: a cross-sectional analysis of balance deficits following acute concussion in community-dwelling adults.

机构信息

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute -University Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2021 Apr 16;35(5):587-595. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1891288. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

: To characterize balance deficits in community-dwelling adults following acute concussion. Cross-sectional observational study. Individuals with acute concussion (n=100) and healthy controls (n=20) completed the BESS (Balance Error Scoring System) and quiet standing trials on forceplates with the eyes open, closed, or during a cognitive dual task. BESS score and centre-of-pressure root mean square and high-frequency power (0.4-3Hz) were used to characterize group differences. In a secondary analysis, participants were subdivided based on self-reported symptoms of balance problems and dizziness using the SCAT-3 (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool - Third Edition) Symptom Checklist. In comparing individuals with concussion and controls, BESS score (16.0 ± 6.0 vs 12.6 ± 3.8; (1,116) = 5.814, = .017) and anteroposterior [(1.78, 204.2) = 11.93, < .001] and mediolateral [(1, 114) = 10.05, = .002] high-frequency power revealed significant group differences. Dividing individuals based on self-reported symptoms revealed significant differences in mediolateral high frequency power, such that participants reporting balance and dizziness problems as well as those participants not reporting balance or dizziness symptoms following concussion were less stable than controls. Deficits in clinical and posturographic measures of balance occur in community-dwelling adults with concussion. These measures do not align with self-reported balance symptoms. Future research and clinical practice aimed at careful selection of optimized balance assessment is recommended.

摘要

: 描述社区成年人在急性脑震荡后平衡缺陷。横断面观察性研究。急性脑震荡患者(n=100)和健康对照组(n=20)在睁眼、闭眼或认知双重任务期间在测力台上完成 BESS(平衡错误评分系统)和安静站立试验。使用 BESS 评分和中心压力均方根和高频功率(0.4-3Hz)来描述组间差异。在二次分析中,根据 SCAT-3(运动性脑震荡评估工具-第三版)症状清单自我报告的平衡问题和头晕症状,将参与者细分为亚组。在比较脑震荡患者和对照组时,BESS 评分(16.0±6.0 与 12.6±3.8;(1,116)=5.814, =0.017)和前后向[(1.78, 204.2)=11.93, <0.001]和左右向[(1, 114)=10.05, =0.002]高频功率显示出显著的组间差异。根据自我报告的症状将参与者分组,发现左右向高频功率存在显著差异,即报告平衡和头晕问题以及脑震荡后没有报告平衡或头晕症状的参与者比对照组更不稳定。在社区成年人中,脑震荡患者的临床和姿势图平衡测量存在缺陷。这些措施与自我报告的平衡症状不一致。建议未来的研究和临床实践应致力于优化平衡评估的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验