Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Jul;65(6):852-858. doi: 10.1111/aas.13822. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Anoxic-ischemic brain injury is the most common cause of death after cardiac arrest (CA). Robust methods to detect severe injury with a low false positive rate (FPR) for poor neurological outcome include the pupillary light reflex (PLR) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). The PLR can be assessed manually or with automated pupillometry which provides the neurological pupil index (NPi). We aim to describe the interrelation between NPi values and the absence of SSEP cortical response and to evaluate the capacity of NPi to predict the absence of cortical SSEP response in comatose patients after CA.
A total of 50 patients will be included in an explorative, prospective, observational study of adult (>18 years) comatose survivors of CA admitted to intensive care in a university hospital. NPi assessed with a hand-held pupillometer will be compared to SSEP signals recorded >48 hours after CA. Primary outcomes are sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio for NPi to predict bilateral absence of the SSEP N20 signal, with NPi values corresponding to <5% FPRs of SSEP absence. Secondary outcomes are the PLR and SSEP sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio for poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge and death at 30 days.
The PLR and SSEP may have a systematic interrelation, and a certain NPi threshold could potentially predict the absence of cortical SSEP response. If this can be concluded from the present study, SSEP testing could be excluded in certain patients to save resources in the multimodal prognostication after CA. Editorial comment The interrelation between loss of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) and the loss of cortical response to a somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) in comatose cardiac arrest patients is not known. This exploratory prospective study is designed to evaluate whether a specific degree of attenuated PLR, as measured by semiautomated pupillometry, can predict the bilateral loss of cortical SSEP response in severe anoxic/ischemic brain injury. Such an interrelation between the two methods would enable the use of pupillometry rather than the more resource demanding SSEP for neurologic prognostication in post cardiac arrest patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04720482, Registered 21 January 2021, retrospectively registered.
缺氧缺血性脑损伤是心脏骤停(CA)后死亡的最常见原因。 包括瞳孔光反射(PLR)和体感诱发电位(SSEP)在内的检测严重损伤且假阳性率(FPR)低的可靠方法对不良神经预后的检测。 PLR 可以手动评估或使用提供神经瞳孔指数(NPi)的自动瞳孔计进行评估。 我们旨在描述 NPi 值与 SSEP 皮质反应缺失之间的相互关系,并评估 NPi 预测 CA 后昏迷患者皮质 SSEP 反应缺失的能力。
将总共 50 名成年(>18 岁)CA 昏迷幸存者纳入一项探索性、前瞻性、观察性研究,这些患者被收入大学医院的重症监护病房。 将使用手持式瞳孔计评估的 NPi 与 CA 后>48 小时记录的 SSEP 信号进行比较。 主要结局是 NPi 预测双侧 SSEP N20 信号缺失的灵敏度、特异性和优势比,NPi 值对应于 SSEP 缺失的<5%FPR。 次要结局是 PLR 和 SSEP 的灵敏度、特异性和优势比,以预测出院时不良神经结局和 30 天时死亡。
PLR 和 SSEP 可能存在系统相关性,特定的 NPi 阈值可能可以预测皮质 SSEP 反应缺失。 如果从本研究中得出结论,那么在 CA 后的多模态预后中,SSEP 测试可以排除某些患者,以节省资源。 编辑评论 昏迷性心脏骤停患者的瞳孔光反射(PLR)丧失与体感诱发电位(SSEP)皮质反应丧失之间的关系尚不清楚。 这项探索性前瞻性研究旨在评估半自动化瞳孔计测量的 PLR 衰减程度是否可以预测严重缺氧/缺血性脑损伤双侧皮质 SSEP 反应缺失。 这两种方法之间的这种相互关系将使我们能够使用瞳孔计而不是资源需求更高的 SSEP 来对心脏骤停后患者进行神经预后评估。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04720482,2021 年 1 月 21 日注册,回顾性注册。