Division of Paediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France,
Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France,
Neonatology. 2021;118(2):127-138. doi: 10.1159/000513783. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Continuous positive airway pressure and surfactant represent the first- and second-line treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates, as European and American guidelines, since 2013 and 2014, respectively, started to recommend surfactant replacement only when continuous positive airway pressure fails. These recommendations, however, are not personalized to the individual physiopathology. Simple clinical algorithms may have improved the diffusion of neonatal care, but complex medical issues can hardly be addressed with simple solutions. The treatment of respiratory distress syndrome is a complex matter and can be only optimized with personalization. We performed a review of tools to individualize the management of respiratory distress syndrome based on physiopathology and actual patients' need, according to precision medicine principles. Advanced oxygenation metrics, lung ultrasound, electrical impedance tomography, and both quantitative and qualitative surfactant assays were examined. When these techniques were investigated with diagnostic accuracy studies, reliability measures have been meta-analysed. Amongst all these tools, quantitative lung ultrasound seems the more developed for the widespread use and has a higher diagnostic accuracy (meta-analytical AUC = 0.952 [95% CI: 0.951-0.953]). Surfactant adsorption (AUC = 0.840 [95% CI: 0.824-0.856]) and stable microbubble test (AUC = 0.800 [95% CI: 0.788-0.812]) also have good reliability, but need further industrial development. We advocate for a more accurate characterization and a personalized approach of respiratory distress syndrome. With the above-described currently available tools, it should be possible to personalize the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome according to physiopathol-ogy.
持续气道正压通气和表面活性剂分别是早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的一线和二线治疗方法,因为自 2013 年和 2014 年以来,欧洲和美国的指南分别开始建议仅在持续气道正压通气失败时才进行表面活性剂替代治疗。然而,这些建议并没有根据个体病理生理学进行个性化。简单的临床算法可能已经改善了新生儿护理的普及,但复杂的医疗问题很难用简单的解决方案来解决。呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗是一个复杂的问题,只有通过个性化才能得到优化。根据精准医学原则,我们回顾了基于病理生理学和实际患者需求的呼吸窘迫综合征管理的个性化工具。我们检查了高级氧合指标、肺部超声、电阻抗断层成像以及定量和定性表面活性剂检测等工具。当这些技术通过诊断准确性研究进行调查时,可靠性指标已经进行了荟萃分析。在所有这些工具中,定量肺部超声似乎发展得更为广泛,其诊断准确性更高(汇总分析 AUC = 0.952 [95%置信区间:0.951-0.953])。表面活性剂吸附(AUC = 0.840 [95%置信区间:0.824-0.856])和稳定微泡试验(AUC = 0.800 [95%置信区间:0.788-0.812])也具有较好的可靠性,但需要进一步的工业开发。我们主张更准确地描述和个性化呼吸窘迫综合征的方法。通过使用上述目前可用的工具,应该有可能根据病理生理学来个性化呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗。