• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胫骨近端骨折采用多轴锁定钢板接骨术的疗效:一项前瞻性临床试验。

Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial.

作者信息

Völk Dominik, Neumaier Markus, Einhellig Heike, Biberthaler Peter, Hanschen Marc

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Freising, Freising, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 18;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z
PMID:33736638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7976713/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes.

METHODS

This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon's experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups.

RESULTS

Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247 .

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估使用不同的多轴锁定钢板治疗胫骨近端骨折的临床和/或放射学结果,即齐默公司的非接触桥接钢板(NCB-PT®)或辛迪斯公司的可变角度锁定加压钢板(VA-LCP®)。

方法

本研究纳入了28例胫骨近端骨折(AO/OTA 41 B-C型)且有锁定钢板内固定指征的患者。所有患者均接受多轴锁定钢板系统治疗。根据骨折形态,患者分别接受NCB-PT®或VA-LCP®治疗。植入物根据外科医生的经验和偏好选择,在粉碎程度较高的情况下,观察到倾向于使用NCB-PT®钢板。术后12个月时,我们进行了临床(如活动范围、拉斯穆森评分)和放射学(如初次/二次复位丢失)随访。

结果

与VA-LCP®组(19例患者)相比,接受NCB-PT®治疗的患者(9例)手术时间更长、植入物更长、受伤至手术间隔时间更长,且术后12个月时临床评分更低。有趣的是,结果显示在临床和放射学结果方面无显著差异。

结论

患者数量少以及骨折的异质性构成了本研究的局限性。尽管如此,植入物的差异化使用与相当的临床和放射学结果相关。本试验强调需要进一步开展患者数量更多的前瞻性随机试验。

试验注册

2020年12月回顾性注册。注册号NCT04680247 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/d40c6ccde994/12891_2021_4158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/17948c77e4e7/12891_2021_4158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/9c20b761b025/12891_2021_4158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/c448829ee7cc/12891_2021_4158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/d40c6ccde994/12891_2021_4158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/17948c77e4e7/12891_2021_4158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/9c20b761b025/12891_2021_4158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/c448829ee7cc/12891_2021_4158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c166/7976713/d40c6ccde994/12891_2021_4158_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome after polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal tibia fractures: a prospective clinical trial.胫骨近端骨折采用多轴锁定钢板接骨术的疗效:一项前瞻性临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 18;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z.
2
Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial.单轴与多轴锁定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折:一项前瞻性随机多中心临床试验。
Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2210-0. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
3
Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome.多轴锁定钢板治疗肱骨远端骨折:临床疗效的比较随机试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1910-9.
4
Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate.Synthes可变角度锁定股骨远端钢板的早期机械故障
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan;30(1):e7-e11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000391.
5
Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.多轴锁定钢板与固定角度锁定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折内固定的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Oct;23(9):645-52. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a567c8.
6
Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?腓骨远端锁定钢板内固定术后早期完全负重是否安全?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x.
7
Intramedullary nail fixation versus locking plate fixation for adults with a fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT RCT.交锁髓内钉固定与锁定钢板固定治疗成人胫骨远端骨折:英国 FixDT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(25):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta22250.
8
Filling Open Screw Holes in the Area of Metaphyseal Comminution Does Not Affect Fatigue Life of the Synthes Variable Angle Distal Femoral Locking Plate in the AO/OTA 33-A3 Fracture Model.在AO/OTA 33-A3骨折模型中,填充干骺端粉碎区域的开放螺钉孔不会影响Synthes可变角度股骨远端锁定钢板的疲劳寿命。
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1;32:293-297.
9
[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].使用锁定加压钢板治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围髁上骨折的接骨术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8.
10
Minimally invasive and open surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures using a polyaxial locking plate system: a prospective multi-centre study.采用多轴锁定钢板系统微创与切开手术治疗胫骨近端骨折:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Apr;37(4):701-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1820-x. Epub 2013 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison Between Conventional and Variable-Angle Locking Compression Plates in Complex Proximal Tibia Fractures.复杂胫骨近端骨折中传统锁定加压钢板与可变角度锁定加压钢板的比较
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69237. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
[Surgical approaches to tibial plateau fractures].[胫骨平台骨折的手术治疗方法]
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Jul;121(7):569-582. doi: 10.1007/s00113-018-0515-6.
2
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018.《骨折与脱位分类汇编 - 2018》
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.
3
The Munich Knee Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Tool for Knee Disorders.慕尼黑膝关节问卷:一种用于膝关节疾病的新型患者报告结局测量工具的开发与验证
Arthroscopy. 2015 Aug;31(8):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.026. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of two innovative locking implants for comminuted olecranon fractures under high-cycle loading conditions.两种用于粉碎性鹰嘴骨折的新型锁定植入物在高循环载荷条件下的生物力学评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):985-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
5
Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial.单轴与多轴锁定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折:一项前瞻性随机多中心临床试验。
Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2210-0. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
6
[Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates].[单轴与多轴锁定钢板]
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Aug;116(8):733-41; quiz 742-3. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2451-9.
7
Sports activity after surgical treatment of intra-articular tibial plateau fractures in skiers.滑雪运动员胫骨平台关节内骨折手术后的体育活动。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1340-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546513489524.
8
Are there any differences in various polyaxial locking systems? A mechanical study of different locking screws in multidirectional angular stable distal radius plates.
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2013 Apr;58(2):187-94. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0105.
9
[Proximal tibia fracture treatment with a new locking device with polyaxial screw placement: technique and early results].[采用新型多轴螺钉置入锁定装置治疗胫骨近端骨折:技术与早期结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Feb;151(1):85-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328204. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
10
Minimally invasive and open surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures using a polyaxial locking plate system: a prospective multi-centre study.采用多轴锁定钢板系统微创与切开手术治疗胫骨近端骨折:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Apr;37(4):701-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1820-x. Epub 2013 Feb 16.