Völk Dominik, Neumaier Markus, Einhellig Heike, Biberthaler Peter, Hanschen Marc
Department of Trauma Surgery, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Freising, Freising, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 18;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04158-z.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and/or radiologic outcome using different polyaxial locking plates for the treatment of proximal tibia fractures, the Non-Contact-Briding plate (NCB-PT®) by Zimmer or the Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate (VA-LCP®) by Synthes.
This study enrolled 28 patients with proximal tibia fractures (AO/ OTA 41 B-C) and indication for locking plate osteosynthesis. All patients were treated with a polyaxial locking plate system. Depending on the fracture morphology, patients were either treated with a NCB-PT® or VA-LCP®. The implant was chosen according to the surgeon's experience and preference, in case of a higher degree of comminution the tendency was observed to use the NCB-PT® plate. After a time interval of 12 months postoperative we conducted clinical (e.g. range of motion, the Rasmussen score) and radiological (e.g. primary/secondary loss of reduction) follow-ups.
Patients provided with the NCB-PT® (9 patients) showed longer operation time, use of longer implants, longer interval from injury to surgery and lower clinical scores after the 12 months follow-up compared with the VA-LCP® group (19 patients). Interestingly, the results showed no significant differences regarding the clinical and radiologic outcome.
The small number of patients as well as the heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. Nevertheless, the differentiated use of implants is associated with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes. This trial emphasizes the need for further prospective randomised trials with higher patient numbers.
Retrospectively registered 21.12.2020. Registration number NCT04680247 .
本研究旨在评估使用不同的多轴锁定钢板治疗胫骨近端骨折的临床和/或放射学结果,即齐默公司的非接触桥接钢板(NCB-PT®)或辛迪斯公司的可变角度锁定加压钢板(VA-LCP®)。
本研究纳入了28例胫骨近端骨折(AO/OTA 41 B-C型)且有锁定钢板内固定指征的患者。所有患者均接受多轴锁定钢板系统治疗。根据骨折形态,患者分别接受NCB-PT®或VA-LCP®治疗。植入物根据外科医生的经验和偏好选择,在粉碎程度较高的情况下,观察到倾向于使用NCB-PT®钢板。术后12个月时,我们进行了临床(如活动范围、拉斯穆森评分)和放射学(如初次/二次复位丢失)随访。
与VA-LCP®组(19例患者)相比,接受NCB-PT®治疗的患者(9例)手术时间更长、植入物更长、受伤至手术间隔时间更长,且术后12个月时临床评分更低。有趣的是,结果显示在临床和放射学结果方面无显著差异。
患者数量少以及骨折的异质性构成了本研究的局限性。尽管如此,植入物的差异化使用与相当的临床和放射学结果相关。本试验强调需要进一步开展患者数量更多的前瞻性随机试验。
2020年12月回顾性注册。注册号NCT04680247 。