• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腓骨远端锁定钢板内固定术后早期完全负重是否安全?

Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?

机构信息

Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x
PMID:33563235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7874601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the modern western world appraisal of economical points such as treatment and disability after trauma present a financial burden. In this context open reduction internal fixation techniques allowing for early full weight bearing might not only improve the clinical outcome but also shorten the period of disability in working life. The aim of the study was to analyze whether ORIF of ankle fractures using either a standard semitubular plate or a new polyaxial locking plate system result in a better clinical outcome.

METHODS

In this prospective study, all patients with distal fibula fractures (AO 44 B1.1, B1.2, B1.3), with indication for surgery were included. Patients were randomized to either the DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or NEWCLIP TECHNICS, Active Ankle® polyaxial locking plate (Group II). Primary outcome parameter was function of the ankle joint, assessed by the Olerud and Molander ankle score, Foot and Ankle outcome score and Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle function. Secondary outcome parameter were postoperative complications. Superficial wound infection, delayed wound healing, mechanically prominent implant, skin irritations were considered as minor and deep wound infection, material loosening, loss of reduction were regarded as major complications requiring revision surgery. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (31 W/21 M) with a mean age of 43 yrs. (range 22-64 yrs.) were enrolled. Seven patients (13.5%) were excluded, so that 45 patients were available for follow up. Twenty-five patients were treated with DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (55.6%; group I) while 20 patients received an anatomically preformed polyaxial locking plate (44.4%, group II). Four minor complications occurred in Group I (16%) compared to two minor complications in group II (10%). Significant better clinical results regarding OMAS (p < 0.02, < 0.04), KPSS (p < 0.04) and FAOS (p < 0.02, < 0.03) were observed 6 and 12 weeks after surgery in group II.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the presented study demonstrate a significant better clinical functional outcome in the early postoperative follow-up in patients treated with a polyaxial locking plate. Furthermore, our data show that ORIF using polyaxial locking plates in combination with an early postoperative weight bearing presents a safe, stable treatment option for ankle fractures so that patients benefit especially in the early stages of recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered 20 April 2020, retrospectively on ClinicalTrails.gov ( NCT04370561 ).

摘要

背景

在现代西方世界,创伤后治疗和残疾的经济评估带来了经济负担。在这种情况下,允许早期完全负重的切开复位内固定技术不仅可以改善临床结果,还可以缩短工作生活中的残疾期。本研究的目的是分析使用标准半管状钢板或新型多轴锁定钢板系统治疗踝关节骨折是否能获得更好的临床结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,所有符合手术指征的腓骨远端骨折(AO 44 B1.1、B1.2、B1.3)患者均纳入研究。患者被随机分为 DePuy Synthes®三分之一管状钢板组(I 组)或 NEWCLIP TECHNICS,Active Ankle®多轴锁定钢板组(II 组)。主要结局参数是踝关节功能,采用 Olerud 和 Molander 踝关节评分、足踝结局评分和 Karlsson 和 Peterson 踝关节功能评分进行评估。次要结局参数为术后并发症。将浅表伤口感染、伤口愈合延迟、机械性突出植入物、皮肤刺激视为轻微并发症,深部伤口感染、材料松动、复位丢失视为需要翻修手术的严重并发症。术后 6 周、12 周、6 个月和 1 年进行临床和影像学随访。

结果

共纳入 52 例患者(31 例女性/21 例男性),平均年龄 43 岁(范围 22-64 岁)。7 例患者(13.5%)被排除,因此 45 例患者可进行随访。25 例患者接受 DePuy Synthes®三分之一管状钢板治疗(55.6%,I 组),20 例患者接受解剖预成型多轴锁定钢板治疗(44.4%,II 组)。I 组有 4 例(16%)发生轻微并发症,II 组有 2 例(10%)发生轻微并发症。术后 6 周和 12 周,II 组的 OMAS(p<0.02,p<0.04)、KPSS(p<0.04)和 FAOS(p<0.02,p<0.03)评分显著改善。

结论

本研究结果表明,多轴锁定钢板治疗的患者在术后早期随访中具有显著更好的临床功能结果。此外,我们的数据表明,多轴锁定钢板结合术后早期负重的切开复位内固定是一种安全、稳定的踝关节骨折治疗方法,患者在康复早期尤其受益。

试验注册

2020 年 4 月 20 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(NCT04370561)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/0db18f6420e1/12891_2021_4009_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/3e12adfc245d/12891_2021_4009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/28d3c127d7e5/12891_2021_4009_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/0db18f6420e1/12891_2021_4009_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/3e12adfc245d/12891_2021_4009_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/28d3c127d7e5/12891_2021_4009_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3c0/7874601/0db18f6420e1/12891_2021_4009_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?腓骨远端锁定钢板内固定术后早期完全负重是否安全?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04009-x.
2
Intramedullary nail fixation versus locking plate fixation for adults with a fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT RCT.交锁髓内钉固定与锁定钢板固定治疗成人胫骨远端骨折:英国 FixDT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(25):1-148. doi: 10.3310/hta22250.
3
Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study.锁定式与非锁定式三分之一管形钢板治疗骨质疏松性腓骨远端骨折的对比研究
Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 6:S60-S65. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30796-9.
4
Treating AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fracture in patients over 50 years of age: periarticular locking plate versus non-locking plate.治疗 50 岁以上患者的 AO/OTA 44B 外踝骨折:关节周围锁定板与非锁定板。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 20;15(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01622-9.
5
Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures.锁定钢板与非锁定钢板治疗腓骨远端骨折的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;57(4):664-667. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.035. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal fibula Danis-Weber types B and C fractures.微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)与切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗 Danis-Weber 类型 B 和 C 型腓骨远端骨折。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 22;15(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02018-5.
7
Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome.多轴锁定钢板治疗肱骨远端骨折:临床疗效的比较随机试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1910-9.
8
Full weight bearing after internal fixation of isolated distal fibular fractures with anatomically contoured locking plates: Our institutional experience.解剖锁定钢板内固定治疗孤立性腓骨远端骨折后完全负重:我们的机构经验。
Injury. 2024 Jun;55 Suppl 1:111476. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111476. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
9
Midterm Outcomes of Unstable Ankle Fractures in Young Patients Treated by Closed Reduction and Fixation With an Intramedullary Fibular Nail vs Open Reduction Internal Fixation Using a Lateral Locking Plate.经皮顺行髓内钉与外侧锁定钢板切开复位内固定治疗不稳定型年轻患者踝关节骨折的中期疗效比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Nov;42(11):1469-1481. doi: 10.1177/10711007211017470. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
A retrospective comparison of double-hooked locking plates versus non-locking plates in minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of comminuted distal fibular fractures accompanied by tibial Pilon fractures.回顾性比较双钩锁定钢板与非锁定钢板在微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗伴有胫骨 Pilon 骨折的粉碎性腓骨远端骨折中的应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 10;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03731-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Early weight-bearing after ankle fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and safety.踝关节骨折手术后早期负重:功能结局与安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 21;20(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06216-x.
2
The Fracture Ankle Implant Review (FAIR) study : a national multicentre retrospective review of practice in implant choice, fixation methods, and outcomes in fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures.踝关节骨折植入物回顾(FAIR)研究:一项关于踝关节骨折中腓骨植入物选择、固定方法及固定效果的全国多中心回顾性研究。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jul 18;6(7):841-849. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0009.R1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Safety of Early Weight Bearing Following Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures.双踝骨折固定后早期负重的安全性
Cureus. 2020 Apr 6;12(4):e7557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7557.
2
[Documentation of self-reported patient outcomes in trauma surgery : Clinical benefits of patient reported outcome measures].创伤外科患者自我报告结局的记录:患者报告结局测量的临床益处
Unfallchirurg. 2020 May;123(5):354-359. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00802-w.
3
Treating AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fracture in patients over 50 years of age: periarticular locking plate versus non-locking plate.
Isolated distal fibula fractures can be treated with locking screw plates with an immediate postoperative weight-bearing.
孤立性腓骨远端骨折可采用锁定螺钉钢板治疗,并在术后立即负重。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1007/s12306-024-00873-7.
4
Finite element analysis and a pilot study of different fixation constructs for Danis-Weber A and B lateral malleolus fractures.有限元分析与 Danis-Weber A、B 型外踝骨折不同固定结构的初步研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Dec 19;24(1):981. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07115-0.
5
A comparison of outcomes of locking versus non-locking plate fixation for the distal fibula fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.锁定与非锁定钢板固定治疗腓骨远端骨折的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):75-89. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03694-9. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
The Effectiveness of Three-Dimensional Osteosynthesis Plates versus Conventional Plates for the Treatment of Skeletal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.三维接骨板与传统接骨板治疗骨骼骨折的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 13;12(14):4661. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144661.
7
Plain X-ray is insufficient for correct diagnosis of tibial shaft spiral fractures: a prospective trial.普通 X 光片不足以正确诊断胫骨骨干螺旋骨折:一项前瞻性试验。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Dec;49(6):2339-2345. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02285-x. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
8
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Functional Outcome in Distal Fibula Fractures between Conventional AO Semitubular Plating and Minimal Invasive Intramedullary "Photodynamic Bone Stabilisation".一项前瞻性随机研究:比较传统AO半管状钢板与微创髓内“光动力骨稳定术”治疗腓骨远端骨折的功能结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 2;11(23):7178. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237178.
治疗 50 岁以上患者的 AO/OTA 44B 外踝骨折:关节周围锁定板与非锁定板。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 20;15(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01622-9.
4
Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial.三周与六周固定治疗稳定型 Weber B 型踝关节骨折:随机、多中心、非劣效性临床试验。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 23;364:k5432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5432.
5
Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures.锁定钢板与非锁定钢板治疗腓骨远端骨折的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jul-Aug;57(4):664-667. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.035. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
6
Economic Analysis of Anatomic Plating Versus Tubular Plating for the Treatment of Fibula Fractures.解剖钢板与管状钢板治疗腓骨骨折的经济学分析
Orthopedics. 2018 Mar 1;41(2):e252-e256. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180213-01. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Shorter recovery can be achieved from using walking boot after operative treatment of an ankle fracture.踝关节骨折手术治疗后使用步行靴可实现更短的恢复时间。
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016 Oct 29;7:10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.09.001. eCollection 2017 Jan.
8
Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study.锁定式与非锁定式三分之一管形钢板治疗骨质疏松性腓骨远端骨折的对比研究
Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 6:S60-S65. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30796-9.
9
Implant Failure Rates and Cost Analysis of Contoured Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.轮廓锁定接骨板与传统接骨板固定腓骨远端骨折的植入物失败率及成本分析
Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e1024-e1029. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20171012-05. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Tubular vs Profile Plate in Peroneal or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Skin Complication? A Retrospective Study in Three Level I Trauma Center.腓骨或双踝骨折中管状钢板与解剖钢板的比较:皮肤并发症真的存在差异吗?一项在三家一级创伤中心进行的回顾性研究。
Med Arch. 2017 Aug;71(4):265-269. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.265-269.