Department of Pediatrics, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Pb 333, 7601, Levanger, Norway.
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021 Mar 18;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00499-0.
To study fatigue in young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 18 years after disease onset, and to compare with controls.
Consecutive children with onset of JIA between 1997 and 2000, from geographically defined areas of Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland were followed for 18 years in a close to population-based prospective cohort study. Clinical features, demographic and patient-reported data were collected. Inclusion criteria in the present study were a baseline visit 6 months after disease onset, followed by an 18-year follow-up with available self-reported fatigue score (Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), 1-7). Severe fatigue was defined as FSS ≥4. For comparison, Norwegian age and sex matched controls were used.
Among 377 young adults with JIA, 26% reported severe fatigue, compared to 12% among controls. We found higher burden of fatigue among participants with sleep problems, pain, poor health, reduced participation in school/work, physical disability, active disease, or use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics/systemic steroids. In contrast, participants without these challenges, had fatigue scores similar to controls. Active disease assessed at all three time points (baseline, 8-year and 18-year follow-up) was associated with higher mean fatigue score and higher percentage of severe fatigue compared to disease courses characterized by periods of inactive disease. Predictors of fatigue at the 18-year follow-up were female sex and diagnostic delay of ≥6 months at baseline, and also pain, self-reported poor health, active disease, and previous/ongoing use of DMARDs/biologics at 8 years.
Fatigue is a prominent symptom in young adults with JIA, with higher fatigue burden among participants with poor sleep, pain, self-reported health problems, active disease, or use of DMARDs/biologics. Participants without these challenges have results similar to controls. Patient- and physician-reported variables at baseline and during disease course predicted fatigue at 18-year follow-up.
研究青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)发病 18 年后年轻患者的疲劳情况,并与对照组进行比较。
本研究为一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,连续纳入了 1997 年至 2000 年期间在挪威、瑞典、丹麦和芬兰的特定地理区域发病的 JIA 患儿,对其进行 18 年的随访。收集临床特征、人口统计学和患者报告数据。本研究的纳入标准为发病后 6 个月内进行基线访视,随后进行 18 年的随访,同时提供自我报告的疲劳评分(疲劳严重程度量表(FSS),1-7)。严重疲劳定义为 FSS≥4。为了进行比较,我们使用了挪威年龄和性别匹配的对照组。
在 377 名 JIA 年轻患者中,26%报告存在严重疲劳,而对照组为 12%。我们发现,存在睡眠问题、疼痛、健康状况不佳、减少参与学校/工作、身体残疾、疾病活动度高或使用疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)/生物制剂/全身类固醇的患者,其疲劳负担更高。相比之下,没有这些问题的患者,其疲劳评分与对照组相似。在所有三个时间点(基线、8 年和 18 年随访)评估的疾病活动度与更高的平均疲劳评分和更高比例的严重疲劳相关,与以疾病静止期为特征的疾病病程相比。18 年随访时疲劳的预测因素为女性、基线时诊断延迟≥6 个月,以及 8 年时的疼痛、自我报告的健康状况不佳、疾病活动度以及之前/正在使用 DMARDs/生物制剂。
疲劳是 JIA 年轻患者的一个突出症状,睡眠不佳、疼痛、自我报告的健康问题、疾病活动度高或使用 DMARDs/生物制剂的患者其疲劳负担更高。没有这些问题的患者,其结果与对照组相似。基线和疾病过程中的患者和医生报告变量预测了 18 年随访时的疲劳。