Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China; and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China; and National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases and National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology and Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, China.
J Endod. 2021 Jun;47(6):982-988. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Retrieving a separated file in the root canal system requires a skilled clinician. A metal file can be removed by ablation via the neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-perovskite (Nd:YAP) laser; however, the efficiency and potential hazards of the ablation procedure are still unclear. The aim of this study was 2-fold: to investigate the efficiency of file ablation using the Nd:YAP laser and to evaluate the rise in temperature of the root surface in vitro.
In part 1 of this study, #10 and #15 C-files (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) and ProTaper Next X1 and X2 files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were selected. Under 8.5×, the Nd:YAP laser was used to ablate the files starting at the tip of the file. The length of the file was recorded after each 5-pulse ablation. In part 2 of this study, 3 files each of the #15 C-file and the ProTaper Next X2 were separated in 6 distal roots of mandibular second molars with single canals. Two-pulse and 5-pulse modes were used to ablate the separated files, and the rise in root surface temperature was recorded with an infrared camera. Another 3 unaltered distal roots served as the negative control. For scanning electron microscopic evaluation, the teeth were split with bone scissors and observed under a scanning electron microscope to evaluate the surface change of the file and the root canal wall.
The average length of the ablated files after each 5-pulse interval was 0.113-0.158 mm with no statistical difference between the different files.The temperature rise of the negative control group (mean ± standard deviation = 1.86° ± 0.11°C and 5.81° ± 0.35°C for the 2- and 5-pulse group) was significantly lower than the roots with separated files (mean ± standard deviation = 3.74° ± 0.20°C and 4.02° ± 0.11°C for 2-pulse C-file and ProTaper Next X2; 8.47° ± 0.19°C and 9.04° ± 0.20°C for 5-pulse C-file and ProTaper Next X2). The temperature rise of all groups was lower than 10°C. The 2-pulse group showed a lower temperature rise than the 5-pulse group. The diameter or the type of alloy had no effect on the temperature rise.
Separated files (stainless steel or nickel-titanium alloy) can be ablated by the Nd:YAP laser. When the number of pulses is less than 5, the temperature rise of the root surface is considered safe to the surrounding periodontium.
在根管系统中取出分离的文件需要熟练的临床医生。通过掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAP)激光可以将金属文件通过烧蚀去除; 然而,烧蚀过程的效率和潜在危害尚不清楚。本研究的目的有两个:一是研究 Nd:YAP 激光对文件烧蚀的效率,二是评估体外根管表面温度的升高。
在本研究的第一部分中,选择了 #10 和 #15 C 锉(VDW GmbH,慕尼黑,德国)和 Protaper Next X1 和 X2 锉(Dentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士)。在 8.5×下,Nd:YAP 激光从锉的尖端开始烧蚀锉。每次烧蚀 5 次脉冲后记录锉的长度。在本研究的第二部分中,在 6 个下颌第二磨牙的 3 个根管中有 3 个分离的 #15 C 锉和 Protaper Next X2 锉。使用 2 脉冲和 5 脉冲模式烧蚀分离的锉,并用红外摄像机记录根管表面温度的升高。另外 3 个未改变的远中根作为阴性对照。对于扫描电子显微镜评估,用骨剪将牙齿劈开,在扫描电子显微镜下观察,以评估锉和根管壁的表面变化。
每次 5 次脉冲间隔后的烧蚀锉的平均长度为 0.113-0.158mm,不同锉之间无统计学差异。阴性对照组(2 脉冲组和 5 脉冲组的平均温度升高分别为 1.86°±0.11°C 和 5.81°±0.35°C)的温度升高明显低于分离锉的根管(2 脉冲组 C 锉和 Protaper Next X2 的平均温度升高分别为 3.74°±0.20°C 和 4.02°±0.11°C;5 脉冲组 C 锉和 Protaper Next X2 的平均温度升高分别为 8.47°±0.19°C 和 9.04°±0.20°C)。所有组的温度升高均低于 10°C。2 脉冲组的温度升高低于 5 脉冲组。直径或合金类型对温度升高没有影响。
分离的文件(不锈钢或镍钛合金)可以通过 Nd:YAP 激光烧蚀。当脉冲数小于 5 时,根管表面的温升被认为对周围牙周组织是安全的。