Suppr超能文献

社区居住的老年人感染的紧急评估和持续护理:一项患者体验的定性研究。

Urgent assessment and ongoing care for infection in community-dwelling older people: a qualitative study of patient experience.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e043541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043541.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experience of infection from the perspective of community-dwelling older people, including access and preferences for place of care.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study, carried out between March 2017 and August 2018.

SETTING

Ambulatory care units in Oxfordshire, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults >70 years with a clinical diagnosis of infection.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews based on a flexible topic guide. Participants were given the option to be interviewed with their caregiver. Thematic analysis was facilitated by NVivo V.11.

RESULTS

Participants described encountering several barriers when accessing an urgent healthcare assessment which were hard to negotiate when they felt unwell. They valued home comforts and independence if they received care for their infection at home, though were worried about burdening their family. Most talked about hospital admission being a necessity in the context of more severe illness. Perceived advantages included monitoring, availability of treatments and investigations. However, some recognised that admission put them at risk of a hospital-acquired infection. Ambulatory care was felt to be convenient if local, but daily transport was challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers may need to think about protocols and targeted advice that could improve access for older people to urgent healthcare when they feel unwell. General practitioners making decisions about place of care may need to better communicate risks associated with the available options and think about balancing convenience with facilities for care.

摘要

目的

从社区居住的老年人的角度探讨感染体验,包括获得护理的途径和对护理场所的偏好。

设计

2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 8 月期间进行的定性访谈研究。

地点

英国牛津郡的门诊护理单位。

参与者

患有感染临床诊断的 70 岁以上成年人。

方法

基于灵活主题指南的半结构化访谈。参与者可以选择与他们的照顾者一起接受采访。NVivo V.11 促进了主题分析。

结果

参与者描述了在寻求紧急医疗评估时遇到的几个障碍,如果他们在家中接受感染治疗,这些障碍很难克服。他们重视家庭舒适和独立性,但又担心给家人带来负担。大多数人认为在病情较重的情况下,住院是必要的。认为住院的好处包括监测、治疗和检查的可及性。然而,一些人认识到住院会使他们面临医院获得性感染的风险。如果当地有门诊护理,感觉会很方便,但每天的交通是一个挑战。

结论

当老年人感到不适时,提供者可能需要考虑一些协议和针对性的建议,以改善他们获得紧急医疗服务的途径。做出护理场所决策的全科医生可能需要更好地沟通可用选项相关的风险,并考虑在便利和护理设施之间取得平衡。

相似文献

2
Infection in older adults: a qualitative study of patient experience.老年人感染:一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Apr 30;70(694):e312-e321. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X709397. Print 2020 May.

本文引用的文献

7
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验