Center for Health and Environmental Risk Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Sep;17(5):1003-1013. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4413. Epub 2021 May 13.
Spiked-sediment toxicity tests with benthic organisms are routinely used to assess the potential ecological impact of sediment-associated hydrophobic organic contaminants. Although several sediment tests have been standardized, experimental factors such as spiking methods still vary between laboratories. To identify the experimental factors that affect the bioavailability of contaminants and account for the highest percentage of the variability of toxicity values (i.e., 50% lethal concentration; LC50), we performed a meta-analysis of published 10-14-day spiked-sediment toxicity tests with the standard test species Hyalella azteca and Chironomus dilutus. Analysis of 172 test records revealed that the variability of sediment LC50s for a given combination of chemical and test species was large. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) was 65%, even after organic carbon normalization, and was slightly larger than the CV in water-only tests (49%). Regression analyses revealed that the most important factor contributing to the variability of the sediment LC50s was sediment type (i.e., environmental or formulated sediment) and that use of formulated sediment (i.e., composed of peat, cellulose, or leaves as organic carbon source) tended to cause higher toxicity than use of environmental sediment. This might be caused by the difference in partitioning the coefficient of organic contaminants and the resulting difference in the bioavailability between sediment types. The effects of other factors, including aging periods and spiking methods, were insignificant or specific to certain chemicals. These discoveries facilitate refinement of the methodologies used in sediment toxicity testing and the correct interpretation of test results. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:1003-1013. © 2021 SETAC.
采用底栖生物进行有刺沉积物毒性测试通常用于评估与沉积物相关的疏水性有机污染物对生态的潜在影响。尽管已经对几种沉积物测试进行了标准化,但实验因素(如添加方法)在不同实验室之间仍然存在差异。为了确定影响污染物生物有效性的实验因素,并解释毒性值变异性的最高比例(即半数致死浓度;LC50),我们对使用标准测试物种海鞘(Hyalella azteca)和摇蚊(Chironomus dilutus)进行的已发表的为期 10-14 天的有刺沉积物毒性测试进行了荟萃分析。对 172 个测试记录的分析表明,给定化学物质和测试物种组合的沉积物 LC50 的变异性很大。即使在进行有机碳归一化后,平均值的变异系数(CV)仍为 65%,略高于仅在水中进行的测试的 CV(49%)。回归分析表明,对沉积物 LC50 变异性贡献最大的因素是沉积物类型(即环境或配方沉积物),并且使用配方沉积物(即由泥炭、纤维素或叶子作为有机碳源组成)往往比使用环境沉积物引起更高的毒性。这可能是由于有机污染物分配系数的差异以及不同沉积物类型之间生物有效性的差异所致。其他因素(包括老化期和添加方法)的影响不显著或特定于某些化学物质。这些发现有助于改进沉积物毒性测试中使用的方法,并正确解释测试结果。综合环境评估与管理 2021;17:1003-1013。©2021 SETAC。