Suppr超能文献

建立用于可比和定量细胞计量表达分析的 CD19 B 细胞参考对照材料。

Establishing CD19 B-cell reference control materials for comparable and quantitative cytometric expression analysis.

机构信息

Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.

Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0248118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248118. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

In the field of cell-based therapeutics, there is a great need for high-quality, robust, and validated measurements for cell characterization. Flow cytometry has emerged as a critically important platform due to its high-throughput capability and its ability to simultaneously measure multiple parameters in the same sample. However, to assure the confidence in measurement, well characterized biological reference materials are needed for standardizing clinical assays and harmonizing flow cytometric results between laboratories. To date, the lack of adequate reference materials, and the complexity of the cytometer instrumentation have resulted in few standards. This study was designed to evaluate CD19 expression in three potential biological cell reference materials and provide a preliminary assessment of their suitability to support future development of CD19 reference standards. Three commercially available human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from three different manufacturers were tested. Variables that could potentially contribute to the differences in the CD19 expression, such as PBMCs manufacturing process, number of healthy donors used in manufacturing each PBMC lot, antibody reagent, operators, and experimental days were included in our evaluation. CD19 antibodies bound per cell (ABC) values were measured using two flow cytometry-based quantification schemes with two independent calibration methods, a single point calibration using a CD4 reference cell and QuantiBrite PE bead calibration. Three lots of PBMC from three different manufacturers were obtained. Each lot of PBMC was tested on three different experimental days by three operators using three different lots of unimolar anti-CD19PE conjugates. CD19 ABC values were obtained in parallel on a selected lot of the PBMC samples using mass spectrometry (CyTOF) with two independent calibration methods, EQ4 and bead-based calibration were evaluated with CyTOF-technology. Including all studied variabilities such as PBMC lot, antibody reagent lot, and operator, the averaged mean values of CD19 ABC for the three PBMC manufacturers (A,B, and C) obtained by flow cytometry were found to be: 7953 with a %CV of 9.0 for PBMC-A, 10535 with a %CV of 7.8 for PBMC-B, and 12384 with a %CV of 16 for PBMC-C. These CD19 ABC values agree closely with the findings using CyTOF. The averaged mean values of CD19 ABC for the tested PBMCs is 9295 using flow cytometry-based method and 9699 using CyTOF. The relative contributions from various sources of uncertainty in CD19 ABC values were quantified for the flow cytometry-based measurement scheme. This uncertainty analysis suggests that the number of antigens or ligand binding sites per cell in each PBMC preparation is the largest source of variability. On the other hand, the calibration method does not add significant uncertainty to the expression estimates. Our preliminary assessment showed the suitability of the tested materials to serve as PBMC-based CD19+ reference control materials for use in quantifying relevant B cell markers in B cell lymphoproliferative disorders and immunotherapy. However, users should consider the variabilities resulting from different lots of PBMC and antibody reagent when utilizing cell-based reference materials for quantification purposes and perform bridging studies to ensure harmonization between the results before switching to a new lot.

摘要

在细胞治疗领域,对细胞特征进行高质量、稳健和验证的测量有着巨大的需求。流式细胞术因其高通量能力和能够同时测量同一样本中的多个参数而成为一个至关重要的平台。然而,为了确保测量的可信度,需要有经过良好表征的生物参考材料,以标准化临床检测并协调实验室之间的流式细胞术结果。迄今为止,由于缺乏足够的参考材料以及细胞仪仪器的复杂性,导致只有少数标准。本研究旨在评估三种潜在的生物细胞参考材料中的 CD19 表达,并初步评估它们支持未来 CD19 参考标准开发的适用性。测试了三种市售的来自三个不同制造商的人外周血单核细胞 (PBMC)。包括 PBMC 制造过程、用于制造每个 PBMC 批次的健康供体数量、抗体试剂、操作人员和实验天数在内的可能导致 CD19 表达差异的变量都包含在我们的评估中。使用两种独立的校准方法,使用 CD4 参考细胞的单点校准和 QuantiBrite PE 珠校准,通过两种基于流式细胞术的定量方案测量每个细胞结合的 CD19 抗体 (ABC) 值。从三个不同的制造商获得了三个批次的 PBMC。每个 PBMC 批次在三个不同的实验日由三名操作人员使用三种不同批次的单摩尔抗 CD19PE 缀合物进行测试。使用两种独立的校准方法,通过质谱法 (CyTOF) 平行获得所选 PBMC 样本的 CD19 ABC 值,评估了 EQ4 和基于珠的校准与 CyTOF 技术的相关性。包括所有研究的变异性,如 PBMC 批次、抗体试剂批次和操作人员,通过流式细胞术获得的三个 PBMC 制造商 (A、B 和 C) 的 CD19 ABC 的平均平均值分别为:PBMC-A 的 7953,CV%为 9.0;PBMC-B 的 10535,CV%为 7.8;PBMC-C 的 12384,CV%为 16。这些 CD19 ABC 值与 CyTOF 的发现非常吻合。使用基于流式细胞术的方法,测试 PBMC 的 CD19 ABC 的平均平均值为 9295,使用 CyTOF 的平均平均值为 9699。对基于流式细胞术的测量方案中 CD19 ABC 值的各种来源的不确定性进行了定量。该不确定性分析表明,每个 PBMC 制剂中的抗原或配体结合位点数量是最大的变异性来源。另一方面,校准方法不会给表达估计增加显著的不确定性。我们的初步评估表明,所测试的材料适合作为基于 PBMC 的 CD19+参考对照材料,用于定量 B 细胞淋巴增生性疾病和免疫治疗中的相关 B 细胞标志物。然而,用户在使用细胞参考材料进行定量时,应考虑到不同批次的 PBMC 和抗体试剂引起的变异性,并在切换到新批次之前进行桥接研究,以确保结果的协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1cd/7978366/efe8090467f3/pone.0248118.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验