Lenkei R, Gratama J W, Rothe G, Schmitz G, D'hautcourt J L, Arekrans A, Mandy F, Marti G
Flow Cytometry Laboratory, S:t. Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cytometry. 1998 Oct 1;33(2):188-96. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981001)33:2<188::aid-cyto13>3.0.co;2-q.
In the frame of the activities initiated by the Task Force for Antigen Quantitation of the European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA), an experiment was conducted to evaluate microbead standards used for quantitative flow cytometry (QFCM). An unified window of analysis (UWA) was established on three different instruments (EPICS XL [Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL], FACScan and FACS Calibur [Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA]) with QC3 microbeads (FCSC, PR). By using this defined fluorescence intensity scale, the performance of several monoclonal antibodies directed to CD3, CD4, and CD8 (conjugated and unconjugated), from three manufacturers (BDIS, Coulter [Immunotech], and DAKO) was tested. In addition, the QIFI system (DAKO) and QuantiBRITE (BDIS), and a method of relative fluorescence intensity (RFI, method of Giorgi), were compared. mAbs reacting with three more antigens, CD16, CD19, and CD38 were tested on the FACScan instrument. Quantitation was carried out using a single batch of cryopreserved peripheral blood leukocytes, and all tests were performed as single color analyses. Significant correlations were observed between the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) values of the same CD antigen measured with various calibrators and with antibodies differing in respect to vendor, labeling and possible epitope recognition. Despite the significant correlations, the ABC values of most monoclonal antibodies differed by 20-40% when determined by the different fluorochrome conjugates and different calibrators. The results of this study indicate that, at the present stage of QFCM consistent ABC values may be attained between laboratories provided that a specific calibration system is used including specific calibrators, reagents, and protocols.
在欧洲临床细胞分析工作组(EWGCCA)抗原定量特别工作组发起的活动框架内,进行了一项实验以评估用于定量流式细胞术(QFCM)的微珠标准品。使用QC3微珠(FCSC,PR)在三种不同仪器(EPICS XL [库尔特公司,迈阿密,佛罗里达州]、FACScan和FACS Calibur [贝克曼库尔特公司,圣何塞,加利福尼亚州])上建立了统一分析窗口(UWA)。通过使用这个定义的荧光强度标度,测试了来自三家制造商(BDIS、库尔特[免疫技术公司]和达科)的几种针对CD3、CD4和CD8的单克隆抗体(共轭和非共轭)的性能。此外,还比较了QIFI系统(达科)和QuantiBRITE(BDIS)以及相对荧光强度方法(RFI,乔吉方法)。在FACScan仪器上测试了与另外三种抗原CD16、CD19和CD38反应的单克隆抗体。使用一批冷冻保存的外周血白细胞进行定量,所有测试均作为单色分析进行。在用各种校准物以及供应商、标记和可能的表位识别不同的抗体测量相同CD抗原的抗体结合能力(ABC)值之间观察到显著相关性。尽管存在显著相关性,但当通过不同的荧光染料共轭物和不同的校准物测定时,大多数单克隆抗体的ABC值相差20%-40%。这项研究的结果表明,在QFCM的现阶段,只要使用包括特定校准物、试剂和方案的特定校准系统,各实验室之间可能获得一致的ABC值。