• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧开胸术与全胸骨切开术在离心式耐用型左心室辅助装置植入中的比较:LVAD 后和心脏移植后的 1 年结果比较。

Left thoracotomy vs full sternotomy for centrifugal durable LVAD implantation: 1-year outcome comparison post-LVAD and post-heart transplantation.

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA, 02111, USA.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., South Building, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.

出版信息

J Artif Organs. 2021 Sep;24(3):312-319. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01250-y. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10047-021-01250-y
PMID:33740155
Abstract

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations have traditionally been approached through a full median sternotomy (FS). Recently, a minimally invasive left thoracotomy (LT) approach has been popularized. This study sought to compare the outcomes of FS and LT patients post-primary LVAD implantation and post-subsequent heart transplant (HT). This was a single-center retrospective study. 83 patients who underwent primary centrifugal durable LVAD implantation from January 2014 to June 2018 were included (FS, n = 41; LT, n = 42). 41 patients had a subsequent HT (FS, n = 19; LT, n = 22). Pre-operative patient demographics, intraoperative variables, post-operative 1-year survival, length of hospital stay, complications, and outcomes for LVAD implantation and following HT were analyzed. Intraoperative data showed that the LT group had a 23.4% longer mean LVAD implant surgical time (p < 0.01). One-year post-LVAD survival was similar between the two groups (p = 0.05). Complication rates, with the exception of the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (p = 0.04) post-LVAD implant were similar. One-year survival post-HT was similar between groups (p = 0.35). Complication rates and mean length of hospital stay were also similar (p = 1.0) post-HT. Our study demonstrated that LT approach does not negatively affect post-LVAD implantation or post-HT outcomes. Further, larger studies may determine more detailed effects of LT approach.

摘要

左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 植入术传统上采用经胸骨正中切开术 (FS)。最近,微创左开胸术 (LT) 已得到普及。本研究旨在比较 FS 和 LT 患者在初次 LVAD 植入术后和随后进行心脏移植 (HT) 后的结局。这是一项单中心回顾性研究。纳入 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受初次离心式耐用型 LVAD 植入术的 83 例患者 (FS 组 41 例,LT 组 42 例)。41 例患者随后接受 HT (FS 组 19 例,LT 组 22 例)。分析了术前患者人口统计学资料、术中变量、术后 1 年生存率、住院时间、并发症以及 LVAD 植入术和随后 HT 的结果。术中数据显示,LT 组的 LVAD 植入手术时间平均长 23.4% (p<0.01)。两组术后 1 年生存率相似 (p=0.05)。除 LVAD 植入术后出血性卒中发生率外 (p=0.04),两组并发症发生率相似。两组术后 1 年 HT 生存率相似 (p=0.35)。HT 后并发症发生率和平均住院时间也相似 (p=1.0)。本研究表明,LT 方法不会对 LVAD 植入术后或 HT 后结局产生负面影响。进一步的大样本研究可能会确定 LT 方法的更详细影响。

相似文献

1
Left thoracotomy vs full sternotomy for centrifugal durable LVAD implantation: 1-year outcome comparison post-LVAD and post-heart transplantation.左侧开胸术与全胸骨切开术在离心式耐用型左心室辅助装置植入中的比较:LVAD 后和心脏移植后的 1 年结果比较。
J Artif Organs. 2021 Sep;24(3):312-319. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01250-y. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Analysis of Minimally Invasive Left Thoracotomy HVAD Implantation - A Single-Center Experience.微创左胸入路植入HeartWare心室辅助装置的分析——单中心经验
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;67(3):170-175. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649493. Epub 2018 May 27.
3
Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Comparative Study.微创左心室辅助装置植入术:一项对比研究。
Artif Organs. 2018 Dec;42(12):1125-1131. doi: 10.1111/aor.13269. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Redo sternotomy versus left ventricular assist device explant as risk factors for early mortality following heart transplantation.再次开胸与左心室辅助装置(LVAD)取出作为心脏移植术后早期死亡的危险因素。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov 1;31(5):603-610. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa180.
5
Left ventricular assist device implantation via lateral thoracotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经侧胸小切口植入左心室辅助装置:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Oct;41(10):1440-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Less Invasive Approach to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation May Improve Survival in High-Risk Patients.微创方法植入左心室辅助装置可能改善高危患者的生存率。
Innovations (Phila). 2020 May/Jun;15(3):243-250. doi: 10.1177/1556984520918959. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Impact of thoracotomy approach on right ventricular failure and length of stay in left ventricular assist device implants: an intermacs registry analysis.胸腔切开术对左心室辅助装置植入患者右心衰竭和住院时间的影响:Intermacs 注册分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Sep;40(9):981-989. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Lateral Thoracotomy for Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Literature.侧开胸术在心室辅助装置植入术中的应用:文献荟萃分析。
ASAIO J. 2021 Aug 1;67(8):845-855. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001359.
9
Minimally Invasive Implantation of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: The Evolution of Surgical Techniques in a Single-Center Experience.连续流左心室辅助装置的微创植入:单中心经验中手术技术的演变
Artif Organs. 2019 Mar;43(3):E41-E52. doi: 10.1111/aor.13339. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
10
First results of HeartWare left ventricular assist device implantation with tunnelling of the outflow graft through the transverse sinus.经横窦进行流出道移植物隧道化植入HeartWare左心室辅助装置的初步结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):503-508. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx124.

引用本文的文献

1
Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Primer For the General Cardiologist.左心室辅助装置:心内科医生入门指南。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027251. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027251. Epub 2022 Dec 14.