• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加权还是聚合?探究多属性选择中的信息处理。

Weighting or aggregating? Investigating information processing in multi-attribute choices.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Department of Economics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1291-1305. doi: 10.1002/hec.4245. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4245
PMID:33740258
Abstract

Multi-attribute choices are commonly analyzed in economics to value goods and services. Analysis assumes individuals consider all attributes, making trade-offs between them. Such decision-making is cognitively demanding, often triggering alternative decision rules. We develop a new model where individuals aggregate multi-attribute information into meta-attributes. Applying our model to a choice experiment (CE) dataset, accounting for attribute aggregation (AA) improves model fit. The probability of adopting AA is greater for: homogenous attribute information; participants who had shorter response time and failed the dominance test; and for later located choices. Accounting for AA has implications for welfare estimates. Our results underline the importance of accounting for information processing rules when modelling multi-attribute choices.

摘要

多属性选择在经济学中常用于评估商品和服务的价值。分析假设个体考虑所有属性,并在它们之间进行权衡取舍。这种决策是认知上的要求,通常会触发替代决策规则。我们开发了一种新模型,其中个体将多属性信息汇总到元属性中。将我们的模型应用于选择实验(CE)数据集,解释了属性聚合(AA)会提高模型拟合度。采用 AA 的概率更高的情况有:同质的属性信息;响应时间较短且未能通过优势测试的参与者;以及位于较后的选择。解释 AA 对福利评估有影响。我们的结果强调了在多属性选择建模时,考虑信息处理规则的重要性。

相似文献

1
Weighting or aggregating? Investigating information processing in multi-attribute choices.加权还是聚合?探究多属性选择中的信息处理。
Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1291-1305. doi: 10.1002/hec.4245. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
The eyes have it: Using eye tracking to inform information processing strategies in multi-attributes choices.眼睛说明了一切:利用眼动追踪为多属性选择中的信息处理策略提供依据。
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):709-721. doi: 10.1002/hec.3626. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
3
Multi-attribute decision-making in macaques relies on direct attribute comparisons.猕猴的多属性决策依赖于直接的属性比较。
bioRxiv. 2023 Nov 22:2023.10.22.563329. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.22.563329.
4
Multiattribute Decision-making in Macaques Relies on Direct Attribute Comparisons.猕猴的多属性决策依赖于直接属性比较。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Sep 1;36(9):1879-1897. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02208.
5
Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.考虑到口味:一个多属性神经计算模型解释了自我和他人选择的神经动力学。
J Neurosci. 2018 Sep 12;38(37):7952-7968. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3327-17.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
Two-dimensional reward evaluation in mice.小鼠的二维奖励评估。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Sep;24(5):981-998. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01482-8. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡:风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Risky decisions are influenced by individual attributes as a function of risk preference.风险决策受个体属性的影响,而个体属性则是风险偏好的函数。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Dec;147:101614. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101614. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior.权衡取舍:一种选择行为的概率性和情境敏感模型。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):137-55. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.137.
10
A Computational Model of Attention Control in Multi-Attribute, Context-Dependent Decision Making.多属性、上下文相关决策中注意力控制的计算模型
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;13:40. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00040. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?一举两得:如果要超越传统的单一最佳离散选择实验,我们应该使用最佳最差、最佳最佳还是排序法来进行偏好 elicitation?
Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2630-2647. doi: 10.1002/hec.4599. Epub 2022 Sep 14.