Suppr超能文献

维持性 PARP 抑制剂治疗铂敏感复发性卵巢癌患者无进展生存期改善的分子和临床预测因素:一项荟萃分析。

Molecular and clinical predictors of improvement in progression-free survival with maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in women with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Australia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;127(14):2432-2441. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33517. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors performed a meta-analysis to better quantify the benefit of maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy to inform practice in platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer for patient subsets with the following characteristics: germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm), somatic BRCA mutation (sBRCAm), wild-type BRCA but homologous recombinant-deficient (HRD), homologous recombinant-proficient (HRP), and baseline clinical prognostic characteristics.

METHODS

Randomized trials comparing a PARPi versus placebo as maintenance treatment were identified from electronic databases. Treatment estimates of progression-free survival were pooled across trials using the inverse variance weighted method.

RESULTS

Four trials included 972 patients who received a PARPi (olaparib, 31%; niraparib, 35%; or rucaparib, 34%) and 530 patients who received placebo. For patients who had germline BRCA1 mutation (gBRCAm1) (N = 471), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.23-0.37); for those who had germline BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm2) (N = 236), the HR was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.17-0.39); and, for those who had sBRCAm (N = 123), the HR was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The treatment effect was similar between the gBRCAm and sBRCAm subsets (P = .48). In patients who had wild-type BRCA HRD tumors (excluding sBRCAm; N = 309), the HR was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.56); and, in those who had wild-type BRCA HRP tumors (N = 346), the HR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.83). The relative treatment effect was greater for the BRCAm versus HRD (P = .03), BRCAm versus HRP (P < .00001), and HRD versus HRP (P < .00001) subsets. There was no difference in benefit based on age, response after recent chemotherapy, and prior bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade ovarian cancer, maintenance PARPi improves progression-free survival for all patient subsets. PARPi therapy has a similar magnitude of benefit for sBRCAm and gBRCAm. Although patients with BRCAm derive the greatest benefit, the absence of a BRCAm or HRD could not be used to exclude patients from maintenance PARPi therapy.

摘要

背景

作者进行了一项荟萃分析,以更好地量化维持性聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)治疗对铂类敏感、复发性高级别卵巢癌患者亚组的获益,这些患者亚组具有以下特征:种系 BRCA 突变(gBRCAm)、体细胞 BRCA 突变(sBRCAm)、野生型 BRCA 但同源重组缺陷(HRD)、同源重组功能正常(HRP)和基线临床预后特征。

方法

从电子数据库中确定了比较 PARPi 与安慰剂作为维持治疗的随机试验。使用逆方差加权法对来自多个试验的无进展生存期治疗估计值进行汇总。

结果

四项试验纳入了 972 名接受 PARPi(奥拉帕利,31%;尼拉帕利,35%;或鲁卡帕利,34%)和 530 名接受安慰剂的患者。对于存在种系 BRCA1 突变(gBRCAm1)的患者(N=471),风险比(HR)为 0.29(95%CI,0.23-0.37);对于存在种系 BRCA2 突变(gBRCAm2)的患者(N=236),HR 为 0.26(95%CI,0.17-0.39);对于存在 sBRCAm 的患者(N=123),HR 为 0.22(95%CI,0.12-0.41)。gBRCAm 和 sBRCAm 亚组之间的治疗效果相似(P=0.48)。在野生型 BRCA HRD 肿瘤(不包括 sBRCAm;N=309)患者中,HR 为 0.41(95%CI,0.31-0.56);在野生型 BRCA HRP 肿瘤(N=346)患者中,HR 为 0.64(95%CI,0.49-0.83)。BRCAm 与 HRD(P=0.03)、BRCAm 与 HRP(P<0.00001)和 HRD 与 HRP(P<0.00001)亚组相比,相对治疗效果更大。基于年龄、近期化疗后的反应和贝伐单抗的使用,并未观察到获益的差异。

结论

在铂类敏感、复发性高级别卵巢癌中,维持性 PARPi 可改善所有患者亚组的无进展生存期。PARPi 治疗对 sBRCAm 和 gBRCAm 具有相似的疗效。尽管 BRCAm 患者获益最大,但没有 BRCAm 或 HRD 并不能排除患者接受维持性 PARPi 治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验