Xu Jijun, Sun Zhuo, Wu Jiang, Rana Maunak, Garza Joshua, Zhu Alyssa C, Chakravarthy Krishnan V, Abd-Elsayed Alaa, Rosenquist Ellen, Basi Hersimren, Christo Paul, Cheng Jianguo
Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA.
Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):E131-E152.
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been increasingly used to manage acute and chronic pain. However, the level of clinical evidence to support its use is not clear.
To assess the clinical evidence of PNS in the treatment of acute or chronic pain.
A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of PNS in managing acute or chronic pain.
Data sources were PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, and reference lists. The literature search was performed up to December 2019. Study selection included randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports of PNS in acute or chronic pain. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed utilizing Cochrane review methodologic quality assessment and Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) and Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR). The evidence was summarized utilizing principles of best evidence synthesis on a scale of 1 to 5. Data syntheses: 227 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis.
Evidence synthesis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies showed Level I and II evidence of PNS in chronic migraine headache; Level II evidence in cluster headache, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, chronic low back and lower extremity pain; and Level IV evidence in peripheral neuropathic pain, and postsurgical pain. Peripheral field stimulation has Level II evidence in chronic low back pain, and Level IV evidence in cranial pain.
Lack of high-quality RCTs. Meta-analysis was not possible due to wide variations in experimental design, research protocol, and heterogeneity of study population.
The findings of this systematic review suggest that PNS may be effective in managing chronic headaches, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, and chronic low back and lower extremity pain, with variable levels of evidence in favor of this technique.
外周神经刺激(PNS)已越来越多地用于管理急性和慢性疼痛。然而,支持其使用的临床证据水平尚不清楚。
评估PNS治疗急性或慢性疼痛的临床证据。
对PNS管理急性或慢性疼痛的疗效和安全性进行系统评价。
数据来源为PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、CINAHL Plus、谷歌学术以及参考文献列表。文献检索截至2019年12月。研究选择包括PNS治疗急性或慢性疼痛的随机试验、观察性研究和病例报告。使用Cochrane综述方法学质量评估以及介入性疼痛管理技术-可靠性和偏倚风险评估质量评价(IPM-QRB)和非随机研究的介入性疼痛管理技术-可靠性和偏倚风险评估质量评价(IPM-QRBNR)进行数据提取和方法学质量评估。证据采用最佳证据合成原则在1至5级范围内进行总结。数据合成:227项研究符合纳入标准并纳入定性合成。
基于随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究的证据合成显示,PNS治疗慢性偏头痛有I级和II级证据;治疗丛集性头痛、截肢后疼痛、慢性盆腔疼痛、慢性腰腿痛和下肢疼痛有II级证据;治疗周围神经性疼痛和术后疼痛有IV级证据。外周区域刺激治疗慢性腰背痛有II级证据,治疗头痛有IV级证据。
缺乏高质量的RCT。由于实验设计、研究方案和研究人群的异质性差异很大,无法进行荟萃分析。
本系统评价的结果表明,PNS可能对管理慢性头痛、截肢后疼痛、慢性盆腔疼痛以及慢性腰腿痛和下肢疼痛有效,支持该技术的证据水平各不相同。