• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚失业者和残疾津贴领取者的医疗服务使用情况:一项全国性横断面研究。

Health service use of Australian unemployment and disability benefit recipients: a national, cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Collie Alex, Sheehan Luke, McAllister Ashley

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06255-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06255-0
PMID:33740960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977490/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare is funded and delivered separately from income support programs such as unemployment and disability benefits. Greater understanding of the health service use (HSU) of benefit recipients would support more effective design and delivery of health and income support programs. This study aimed to characterise the HSU of disability and unemployment benefit recipients relative to people earning wages, while controlling for personal, household and health-related factors associated with HSU in benefit recipients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional national survey of 9110 working age Australian adults in three groups: (1) 566 receiving the disability support pension (DSP); (2) 410 receiving unemployment benefits; and (3) 8134 earning wages. Outcomes included prevalence and frequency of health professional consultations, hospital attendance and admission in the past 12 months, as well as medication and supplement use in the past 2 weeks. Analyses compared DSP and unemployment benefit recipients to wage earners using prevalence ratios and incident rate ratios, adjusted for predisposing, enabling and need factors that may affect HSU.

RESULTS

In adjusted regression models, both DSP and unemployment benefit recipients were significantly more likely than wage earners to have consulted psychologists and social workers. DSP recipients also reported a significantly higher prevalence of consultations with General Practitioners (GPs), specialist physicians and podiatrists.. Both groups reported significantly more frequent consultations with GPs and DSP recipients with specialists. No differences were observed between groups for hospital attendance or admission, or supplement use in fully adjusted models, though the DSP group reported more prevalent medication use than wage earners. Inclusion of confounders including self-assessed health, disability severity, health insurance status, and financial resources attenuated the relationship between benefit receipt and HSU, however significant associations were still observed.

CONCLUSIONS

People receiving unemployment and disability insurance benefits use significantly more health services than wage earners. A range of personal and clinical characteristics explained much, but not all, of the association between greater HSU and benefit receipt. Greater coordination between health and income support systems may improve health, reduce HSU and improve work ability in unemployed and working age people.

摘要

背景

医疗保健的资金来源和提供方式与失业救济和残疾福利等收入支持计划是分开的。更好地了解福利领取者的医疗服务使用情况,将有助于更有效地设计和实施医疗与收入支持计划。本研究旨在描述残疾和失业福利领取者相对于有工资收入者的医疗服务使用情况,同时控制与福利领取者医疗服务使用相关的个人、家庭和健康因素。

方法

对9110名澳大利亚工作年龄成年人进行了一项全国性横断面调查,分为三组:(1)566名领取残疾支持养老金(DSP)的人;(2)410名领取失业救济金的人;(3)8134名有工资收入的人。结果包括过去12个月内与医疗专业人员咨询的患病率和频率、住院就诊和入院情况,以及过去2周内药物和补充剂的使用情况。分析使用患病率比和发病率比,将DSP和失业救济金领取者与有工资收入者进行比较,并对可能影响医疗服务使用的易患因素、促成因素和需求因素进行了调整。

结果

在调整后的回归模型中,DSP和失业救济金领取者咨询心理学家和社会工作者的可能性均显著高于有工资收入者。DSP领取者与全科医生(GP)、专科医生和足病医生咨询的患病率也显著更高。两组与全科医生咨询的频率均显著更高,DSP领取者与专科医生咨询的频率也更高。在完全调整后的模型中,两组在住院就诊或入院情况以及补充剂使用方面未观察到差异,尽管DSP组报告的药物使用患病率高于有工资收入者。纳入包括自我评估健康状况、残疾严重程度、健康保险状况和财务资源等混杂因素后,福利领取与医疗服务使用之间的关系有所减弱,但仍观察到显著关联。

结论

领取失业和残疾保险福利的人比有工资收入的人使用的医疗服务显著更多。一系列个人和临床特征解释了医疗服务使用增加与福利领取之间的大部分但并非全部关联。医疗与收入支持系统之间加强协调,可能会改善健康状况、减少医疗服务使用,并提高失业者和工作年龄人群的工作能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/8069e4e04237/12913_2021_6255_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/cdef6d470295/12913_2021_6255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/7a763fd138d6/12913_2021_6255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/0b7aad8a884f/12913_2021_6255_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/8069e4e04237/12913_2021_6255_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/cdef6d470295/12913_2021_6255_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/7a763fd138d6/12913_2021_6255_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/0b7aad8a884f/12913_2021_6255_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5f/7980654/8069e4e04237/12913_2021_6255_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health service use of Australian unemployment and disability benefit recipients: a national, cross-sectional study.澳大利亚失业者和残疾津贴领取者的医疗服务使用情况:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06255-0.
2
Work Disability in Australia: An Overview of Prevalence, Expenditure, Support Systems and Services.澳大利亚的工作残疾:流行率、支出、支持系统和服务概述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Sep;29(3):526-539. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9816-4.
3
Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.缩短失业救济期限以提高就业找到率:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;14(1):1-194. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.2. eCollection 2018.
4
The reservation wages of Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries.社会保障残疾保险受益人的保留工资。
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(4):89-111.
5
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
6
Mental health selection and income support dynamics: multiple spell discrete-time survival analyses of welfare receipt.心理健康选择与收入支持动态:福利领取的多阶段离散时间生存分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Apr;68(4):349-55. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203179. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
Disability benefit coverage and program interactions in the working-age population.劳动年龄人口的残疾福利覆盖范围及项目互动
Soc Secur Bull. 2008;68(1):1-30.
8
The TANF/SSI connection.临时援助家庭计划/补充保障收入计划的关联
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(4):21-36.
9
Social Security's special minimum benefit.社会保障的特别最低福利。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):1-15.
10
Does receipt of unemployment benefits change recruiter perceptions of candidates' personality, work relevant skills and employability?领取失业救济金会改变招聘人员对求职者个性、与工作相关技能及就业能力的看法吗?
Work. 2022;71(4):1029-1041. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205048.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of outpatient healthcare services before and after the onset of unemployment: A register-based propensity score matched study from Finland.使用门诊医疗服务之前和之后的失业:一个基于登记的倾向评分匹配研究来自芬兰。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0288423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288423. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship between work disability and subsequent suicide or self-harm: A scoping review.工作残疾与后续自杀或自我伤害之间的关系:一项范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 7;2(12):e0000922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000922. eCollection 2022.
3
Employment Characteristics and Risk of Hospitalization Among Older Adults Participating in the Mayo Clinic Biobank.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of the disability support pension on mental health: evidence from 14 years of an Australian cohort.残疾抚恤金对心理健康的影响:来自澳大利亚队列 14 年的证据。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Aug;44(4):307-312. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13011. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
2
Social determinants of health and inequalities in COVID-19.新冠疫情中的健康社会决定因素与不平等现象
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):617-618. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa095.
3
Too sick to work, too healthy to qualify: a cross-country analysis of the effect of changes to disability benefits.
参与梅奥诊所生物样本库的老年人的就业特征与住院风险
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Oct 20;6(6):552-563. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.09.003. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
The determinants of healthcare utilisation in regional, rural and remote South Australia: A cross-sectional study.南澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区医疗保健利用的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4850-e4863. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13894. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
因病无法工作,却因健康状况良好而不符合资格:一项跨国分析残疾福利变化的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Aug;73(8):717-722. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212191. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries.社会援助计划对人口健康的影响:高收入国家研究的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6337-1.
5
Screening for social determinants of health in clinical care: moving from the margins to the mainstream.在临床护理中筛查健康的社会决定因素:从边缘走向主流。
Public Health Rev. 2018 Jun 22;39:19. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0094-7. eCollection 2018.
6
Social Prescribing in the U.S. and England: Emerging Interventions to Address Patients' Social Needs.美国和英国的社会处方:满足患者社会需求的新兴干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):715-718. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
'First, do no harm': are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological study.“首先,勿伤患者”:残疾评估与心理健康的不良趋势有关吗?一项纵向生态学研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Apr;70(4):339-45. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206209. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
8
Diagnosis isn't enough: Understanding the connections between high health care utilization, chronic conditions and disabilities among U.S. working age adults.诊断并不够:了解美国工作年龄成年人中高医疗利用率、慢性病与残疾之间的关联
Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):535-46. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 11.
9
Looking Beyond Income and Education: Socioeconomic Status Gradients Among Future High-Cost Users of Health Care.超越收入与教育:未来高成本医疗使用者中的社会经济地位梯度
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 May 8.
10
Cause and effect in studies on unemployment, mental health and suicide: a meta-analytic and conceptual review.失业、心理健康与自杀研究中的因果关系:一项元分析与概念性综述
Psychol Med. 2014 Apr;44(5):909-17. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001621. Epub 2013 Jul 9.