University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Psychol. 2021 Mar 19;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00548-z.
Primary aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to test the effectiveness of the parenting intervention 'Video-feedback to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline' (VIPP-SD) in a sample of parents of preschool-aged twins, as well as differential susceptibility to intervention efforts, that is, whether more temperamentally reactive parents would profit more from the VIPP-SD than parents with lower reactivity.
The sample consisted of 202 families with same-sex twins [N = 404 children, mean age 45 months (SD = 6.81)]. Randomization was done at the family level in a 2:3 ratio, with 83 families (41%) randomized to the VIPP-SD group, and 119 families (59%) to the control group. After two pre-tests in year 1 and year 2 of the study, the VIPP-SD was implemented in the third year, with a post-test assessment 1 month after the five intervention sessions. Parental sensitivity was observed during structured play in which parent and child copied a drawing together in a computerized Etch-A-Sketch paradigm. Parental limit-setting was observed in a 'don't touch' task in which the parent required from the child to abstain from playing with attractive toys. Parents interacted with each of their twins in separate sessions.
The VIPP-SD intervention had a positive impact on the level of parents' positive limit-setting in interaction with their preschool twins, and this positive effect was most pronounced when the parents completed at least five intervention sessions. However, the intervention did not enhance parental sensitivity during structured play. Parents with higher reactivity were not more open to the impact of the intervention, thus for this temperamental marker differential susceptibility in adults was not supported.
The current study is unique in targeting families with twin preschoolers, providing proof of principle that coaching parents with video-feedback promotes parental sensitive limit-setting to both children. It remains to be seen whether this finding can be replicated in families with non-twin siblings, or other parental susceptibility markers. Trial registration Trial NL5172 (NTR5312), 2015-07-20.
本随机对照试验的主要目的是检验育儿干预措施“视频反馈促进积极育儿和敏感纪律”(VIPP-SD)对学龄前双胞胎父母的有效性,以及对干预措施的不同敏感性,即反应性更强的父母是否比反应性较低的父母从 VIPP-SD 中获益更多。
该样本由 202 个同性双胞胎家庭组成[共 404 名儿童,平均年龄为 45 个月(SD=6.81)]。在家庭层面上以 2:3 的比例进行随机分组,83 个家庭(41%)被随机分入 VIPP-SD 组,119 个家庭(59%)被分入对照组。在研究的第 1 年和第 2 年进行了两次预测试后,在第 3 年实施了 VIPP-SD,并在五次干预课程结束后 1 个月进行了后测评估。在计算机化的 Etch-A-Sketch 范式中,父母和孩子一起复制一幅画,在此过程中观察到父母的敏感性。在“不要触摸”任务中,父母要求孩子不要玩吸引人的玩具,以此观察父母的限制设置。父母在单独的会议中与每个双胞胎互动。
VIPP-SD 干预对父母与学龄前双胞胎互动时积极限制设定的水平有积极影响,当父母完成至少五次干预课程时,这种积极影响最为明显。然而,干预并没有提高父母在结构化游戏中的敏感性。反应性较高的父母对干预的影响并不更开放,因此,对于这种气质标记,成人中的不同敏感性并未得到支持。
本研究针对的是有学龄前双胞胎的家庭,为使用视频反馈指导父母促进对两个孩子的敏感限制设定提供了原理证明。尚待观察这一发现是否可以在有非双胞胎兄弟姐妹或其他父母敏感性标记的家庭中复制。试验注册 NL5172 试验(NTR5312),2015 年 7 月 20 日。