Suppr超能文献

[蜗后听觉障碍的电反应测听法]

[Electric response audiometry in retrocochlear hearing disorders].

作者信息

Lenarz T

机构信息

Univ. HNO-Klinik Heidelberg.

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Mar;67(3):123-8.

PMID:3374225
Abstract

The intensive clinical use of Electric Response Audiometry (ERA) has recently improved the diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss. The Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP) allow a precise topodiagnosis of the whole auditory system. However, specific limitations of the different potentials (cochlear, neural, brainstem, thalamic, cortical) have to be considered to avoid an overestimation of ERA. Based on the author's own material of more than 3500 recordings, most cases of a retrocochlear hearing loss are located at the auditory nerve and the brainstem. Therefore, brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA) and electrocochleography (ECoG) are the two most important methods of ERA. Typical Brainstem AEP (BAEP) features of retrocochlear disorders are shown. They are of different diagnostic value. A prolongation of the central conduction time or a break down of the later BAEP, both unequivocal signs of a retrocochlear lesion, were found in only 62 per cent of 100 cases of acoustic neuroma. However, diagnostic sensitivity can be improved to 96 per cent by additional use of ECoG and electrical promontory testing of the excitability of the auditory nerve. This value cannot be attained by any other audiometric test. These results show that BERA and ECoG are essential screening methods of high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss. Additional values for diagnostic specificity and efficacy are also given in comparison with a group of patients initially suspected of having a cerebellopontine angle tumour. These values exceed those of conventional audiometric tests by far. Therefore, BERA and ECoG are reliable predictors of a retrocochlear lesion and can be judged as the best indicators for a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging at present.

摘要

近年来,电反应测听法(ERA)在临床的广泛应用改善了感音神经性听力损失的诊断。听觉诱发电位(AEP)能对整个听觉系统进行精确的定位诊断。然而,为避免对ERA的高估,必须考虑不同电位(耳蜗、神经、脑干、丘脑、皮层)的特定局限性。根据作者自身超过3500例记录资料,大多数蜗后性听力损失病例位于听神经和脑干。因此,脑干电反应测听法(BERA)和耳蜗电图描记法(ECoG)是ERA的两种最重要方法。文中展示了蜗后性疾病典型的脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)特征。它们具有不同的诊断价值。在100例听神经瘤病例中,仅62%发现了中枢传导时间延长或BAEP晚成分消失,这两者都是蜗后性病变的确切迹象。然而,通过额外使用ECoG和对听神经兴奋性进行电鼓岬测试,诊断敏感性可提高到96%。这一数值是其他任何听力测试都无法达到的。这些结果表明,BERA和ECoG是感音神经性听力损失鉴别诊断中高灵敏度的重要筛查方法。与一组最初怀疑患有桥小脑角肿瘤的患者相比,还给出了诊断特异性和有效性的附加数值。这些数值远远超过传统听力测试的数值。因此,BERA和ECoG是蜗后性病变可靠的预测指标,目前可被视为计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)的最佳指示指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验