• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of a Complex Care Program for High-Cost/High-Need Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.高成本/高需求患者复杂护理方案的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2021-2029. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06676-x. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
3
4
A Multigene Signature Based on Cell Cycle Proliferation Improves Prediction of Mortality Within 5 Yr of Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.基于细胞周期增殖的多基因签名可改善肾癌根治性肾切除术后 5 年内死亡率的预测。
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):763-769. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Association of Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring of Heart Failure With Clinical Outcomes in a Concurrent Matched Cohort Analysis.心力衰竭门诊血流动力学监测与同期匹配队列分析中临床结局的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jun 1;4(6):556-563. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1384.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
7
Assessment of an Interactive Digital Health-Based Self-management Program to Reduce Hospitalizations Among Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于互动数字健康的自我管理计划对减少多种慢性病患者住院的评估:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140591. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40591.
8
Can high-cost spending in the community signal admission to hospital? A dynamic modeling study for urgent and elective cardiovascular patients.社区中的高费用支出能否预示着住院治疗?一项针对急诊和择期心血管疾病患者的动态建模研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3639-z.
9
Effect of early physician follow-up on mortality and subsequent hospital admissions after emergency care for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.心力衰竭急诊后早期医生随访对死亡率和随后住院的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2018 Dec 17;190(50):E1468-E1477. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180786.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of serum B-type natriuretic peptide testing and monitoring in patients with heart failure in primary and secondary care: an evidence synthesis, cohort study and cost-effectiveness model.在初级和二级保健中,心力衰竭患者的血清 B 型利钠肽检测和监测的有效性和成本效益:证据综合、队列研究和成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Aug;21(40):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta21400.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying High-Cost, High-Need Patients in a Network of Community Hospitals.确定社区医院网络中的高费用、高需求患者。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241233410. doi: 10.1177/21501319241233410.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Care Hotspotting - A Randomized, Controlled Trial.医疗保健热点研究——一项随机对照试验
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1906848.
2
A Novel Intervention for High-Need, High-Cost Medicaid Patients: a Study of ECHO Care.针对高需求、高成本医疗补助患者的新型干预措施:一项ECHO护理研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05206-0. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
ECHO Care: Providing Multidisciplinary Specialty Expertise to Support the Care of Complex Patients.ECHO 关爱:提供多学科专业知识,支持复杂患者的护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):326-330. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05205-1. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Segmentation of High-Cost Adults in an Integrated Healthcare System Based on Empirical Clustering of Acute and Chronic Conditions.基于急性和慢性疾病实证聚类的综合医疗保健系统中高费用成人的细分
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2171-2179. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4626-0. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
The Laboratory-Based Intermountain Validated Exacerbation (LIVE) Score Identifies Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients at High Mortality Risk.基于实验室的山间验证性急性加重(LIVE)评分可识别出高死亡风险的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jun 11;5:173. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00173. eCollection 2018.
6
The Association of Patient-centered Medical Home Designation With Quality of Care of HRSA-funded Health Centers: A Longitudinal Analysis of 2012-2015.患者为中心的医疗之家指定与 HRSA 资助的医疗中心的医疗质量之间的关联:2012-2015 年的纵向分析。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):130-138. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000862.
7
Impact of Accountable Care Organizations on Utilization, Care, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review.问责制医疗组织对利用、护理和结果的影响:系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Jun;76(3):255-290. doi: 10.1177/1077558717745916. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation and Improved Chronic Disease Quality: A Longitudinal Observational Study.以患者为中心的医疗之家实施与改善慢性病质量:一项纵向观察性研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2503-2522. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12805. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
9
Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review.强化初级保健干预措施的效果:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1377-1386. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4174-z. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
Outcomes For High-Needs Patients: Practices With A Higher Proportion Of These Patients Have An Edge.高需求患者的治疗结果:此类患者比例较高的医疗机构具有优势。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):476-484. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1309.

高成本/高需求患者复杂护理方案的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative Effectiveness of a Complex Care Program for High-Cost/High-Need Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States, Rockville, MD, USA.

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2021-2029. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06676-x. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-06676-x
PMID:33742306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8298622/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-cost/high-need (HCHN) adults and the healthcare systems that provide their care may benefit from a new patient-centered model of care involving a dedicated physician and nurse team who coordinate both clinical and social services for a small patient panel.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of a Complex Care Program (CCP) on likelihood of patient survival and hospital admission in 180 days following empanelment to the CCP.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental design with CCP patients propensity score matched to a concurrent control group of eligible but unempaneled patients.

SETTING

Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS) during 2017-2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Nine hundred twenty-nine CCP patients empaneled January 2017-June 2018, 929 matched control patients for the same period.

INTERVENTIONS

The KPMAS CCP is a new program consisting of 8 teams each staffed by a physician and nurse who coordinate care across a continuum of specialty care, tertiary care, and community services for a panel of 200 patients with advanced clinical disease and recent hospitalizations.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Time to death and time to first hospital admission in the 180 days following empanelment or eligibility.

RESULTS

Compared to matched control patients, CCP patients had prolonged time to death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.577, 95% CI: 0.474, 0.704), and CCP decedents had longer survival (median days 69.5 vs. 53.0, p=0.03). CCP patients had similar time to hospital admission (HR: 1.081, 95% CI: 0.930, 1.258), with similar results when adjusting for competing risk of death (HR: 1.062, 95% CI: 0.914, 1.084).

LIMITATIONS

Non-randomized intervention; single healthcare system; patient eligibility limited to specific conditions.

CONCLUSION

The KPMAS CCP was associated with significantly reduced short-term mortality risk for eligible patients who volunteered to participate in this intervention.

摘要

背景

高成本/高需求(HCHN)成年人及其医疗保健系统可能受益于一种新的以患者为中心的护理模式,该模式涉及一个专门的医生和护士团队,为一个小患者群体协调临床和社会服务。

目的

评估 180 天内参与复杂护理计划(CCP)对患者生存和住院的影响。

设计

使用准实验设计的回顾性队列研究,将 CCP 患者的倾向评分与同期符合条件但未入选的患者进行匹配。

地点

2017-2018 年期间的 Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States(KPMAS)。

参与者

2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月入选的 929 名 CCP 患者,同期为同一时期的 929 名匹配对照患者。

干预措施

KPMAS CCP 是一个新计划,由 8 个团队组成,每个团队都由一名医生和一名护士组成,他们在专科护理、三级护理和社区服务的连续体上为一组 200 名患有晚期临床疾病和近期住院的患者协调护理。

主要结果

入选或符合条件后 180 天内的死亡时间和首次住院时间。

结果

与匹配的对照患者相比,CCP 患者的死亡时间延长(风险比 [HR]:0.577,95%CI:0.474,0.704),CCP 患者的生存期更长(中位天数 69.5 天与 53.0 天,p=0.03)。CCP 患者的住院时间相似(HR:1.081,95%CI:0.930,1.258),在调整死亡竞争风险后结果相似(HR:1.062,95%CI:0.914,1.084)。

局限性

非随机干预;单一医疗保健系统;患者资格仅限于特定条件。

结论

对于自愿参与该干预的符合条件的患者,KPMAS CCP 与显著降低的短期死亡率风险相关。