Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Center for the Study of Emotion & Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 May;53(10):3323-3340. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15194. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
Visual scene processing is modulated by semantic, motivational, and emotional factors, in addition to physical scene statistics. An open question is to what extent those factors affect low-level visual processing. One index of low-level visual processing is the contrast response function (CRF), representing the change in neural or psychophysical gain with increasing stimulus contrast. Here we aimed to (a) establish the use of an electrophysiological technique for assessing CRFs with complex emotional scenes and (b) examine the effects of motivational context and emotional content on CRFs elicited by naturalistic stimuli, including faces and complex scenes (humans, animals). Motivational context varied by expectancy of threat (a noxious noise) versus safety. CRFs were measured in 18 participants by means of sweep steady-state visual evoked potentials. Results showed a facilitation in visuocortical sensitivity (contrast gain) under threat, compared with safe conditions, across all stimulus categories. Facial stimuli prompted heightened neural response gain, compared with scenes. Within the scenes, response gain was smaller for scenes high in emotional arousal, compared with low-arousing scenes, consistent with interference effects of emotional content. These findings support the notion that motivational context alters the contrast sensitivity of cortical tissue, differing from changes in response gain (activation) when visual cues themselves carry motivational/affective relevance.
视觉场景处理除了受到物理场景统计数据的影响外,还受到语义、动机和情感因素的调节。一个悬而未决的问题是这些因素在多大程度上影响了低级视觉处理。低级视觉处理的一个指标是对比度响应函数 (CRF),它表示随着刺激对比度的增加,神经或心理物理增益的变化。在这里,我们旨在 (a) 建立一种使用电生理技术评估复杂情感场景下的 CRF 的方法,以及 (b) 研究动机背景和情感内容对自然刺激(包括人脸和复杂场景(人类、动物))诱发的 CRF 的影响。动机背景通过预期威胁(有害噪声)与安全而变化。通过扫频稳态视觉诱发电位,在 18 名参与者中测量了 CRFs。结果表明,与安全条件相比,在所有刺激类别下,威胁条件下视皮质敏感性(对比度增益)增加。与场景相比,面部刺激引发了更高的神经反应增益。在场景中,与低唤醒场景相比,高情绪唤醒场景的反应增益较小,这与情感内容的干扰效应一致。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即动机背景改变了皮质组织的对比度敏感性,与视觉线索本身具有动机/情感相关性时的反应增益(激活)变化不同。