Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;61(6):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Two dimensional (2D) perfusion angiography is a method that provides quantitative foot perfusion information from standard digital subtraction angiography acquisitions. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of this method in patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) by investigating repeatability, and intra-observer and interobserver agreement.
Twenty patients with CLTI and a below the knee endovascular revascularisation were included in a prospective clinical study. Prior to treatment two perfusion angiography runs were acquired with a five minute interval without performing an intervention. In these recordings, regions of interest were selected and time density curves and perfusion parameters were determined. To investigate intra-observer agreement one observer performed five measurements on the same acquisition for each patient. To investigate interobserver agreement three observers performed measurements on the same acquisition for each patient. Results were presented in Bland-Altman plots and as the intraclass correlation coefficient per parameter.
Two patients were excluded from repeatability analyses because of major motion artefacts. Repeatability analyses of the 18 remaining patients showed excellent correlation for every parameter (> .96). Intra-observer and interobserver agreement for all 20 patients were excellent for all parameters (1.00).
Repeatability and intra-observer and interobserver agreement of 2D perfusion angiography in patients with CLTI were found to be excellent. It is therefore a reliable tool when used according to the standardised methods described in this study.
二维(2D)灌注血管造影是一种从标准数字减影血管造影采集提供定量足部灌注信息的方法。本研究的目的是通过研究重复性、观察者内和观察者间一致性来测试该方法在慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者中的可靠性。
20 例 CLTI 患者和膝下腔内血管重建术患者纳入前瞻性临床研究。在治疗前,两次灌注血管造影采集间隔 5 分钟,不进行干预。在这些记录中,选择感兴趣区域,并确定时间密度曲线和灌注参数。为了研究观察者内一致性,一位观察者对每位患者的同一采集进行了五次测量。为了研究观察者间一致性,三位观察者对每位患者的同一采集进行了五次测量。结果以 Bland-Altman 图和每个参数的组内相关系数表示。
由于主要运动伪影,两名患者被排除在重复性分析之外。对其余 18 名患者的重复性分析显示,每个参数的相关性均极好(>.96)。对所有 20 名患者的观察者内和观察者间一致性分析显示,所有参数的一致性均极好(1.00)。
CLTI 患者的 2D 灌注血管造影的重复性、观察者内和观察者间一致性均极好。因此,当按照本研究中描述的标准化方法使用时,它是一种可靠的工具。