Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 12;14(7):739-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.024. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who predominantly underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), comparing those treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel.
The effect of CYP2C19 genotype on treatment outcomes with ticagrelor or prasugrel compared with clopidogrel is unclear.
Databases through February 19, 2020, were searched for studies reporting the effect of CYP2C19 genotype on ischemic outcomes during ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel treatment. Study eligibility required outcomes reported for CYP2C19 genotype status and clopidogrel and alternative P2Y inhibitors in patients with CAD with at least 50% undergoing PCI. The primary analysis consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A secondary analysis was conducted by adding non-RCTs to the primary analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and severe recurrent ischemia. Meta-analysis was conducted to compare the 2 drug regimens and test interaction with CYP2C19 genotype.
Of 1,335 studies identified, 7 RCTs were included (15,949 patients, mean age 62 years; 77% had PCI, 98% had acute coronary syndromes). Statistical heterogeneity was minimal, and risk for bias was low. Ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with clopidogrel resulted in a significant reduction in ischemic events (relative risk: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.83) in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers but not in noncarriers (relative risk: 1.0; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.25). The test of interaction on the basis of CYP2C19 genotype status was statistically significant (p = 0.013), suggesting that CYP2C19 genotype modified the effect. An additional 4 observational studies were found, and adding them to the analysis provided the same conclusions (p value of the test of interaction <0.001).
The effect of ticagrelor or prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events in patients with CAD who predominantly undergo PCI is based primarily on the presence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function carrier status. These results support genetic testing prior to prescribing P2Y inhibitor therapy.
本研究旨在探讨 CYP2C19 基因型对以经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)为主的冠心病(CAD)患者的临床结局的影响,并比较使用替格瑞洛或普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗的患者。
CYP2C19 基因型对替格瑞洛或普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗的疗效的影响尚不清楚。
通过检索截至 2020 年 2 月 19 日的数据库,寻找报告 CYP2C19 基因型对 CAD 患者在接受替格瑞洛或普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗期间缺血结局影响的研究。研究纳入标准为报告 CYP2C19 基因型状态和 CAD 患者中氯吡格雷和替代 P2Y 抑制剂的结果,其中至少 50%的患者接受 PCI。主要分析包括随机对照试验(RCT)。次要分析是将非 RCT 纳入主要分析。主要结局是心血管死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和支架血栓形成以及严重复发性缺血的复合终点。进行荟萃分析以比较两种药物治疗方案,并检验 CYP2C19 基因型的交互作用。
在 1335 项研究中,有 7 项 RCT 被纳入(15949 例患者,平均年龄 62 岁;77%行 PCI,98%为急性冠状动脉综合征)。统计学异质性很小,偏倚风险低。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷在 CYP2C19 功能丧失型携带者中显著降低了缺血事件的发生(相对风险:0.70;95%置信区间:0.59 至 0.83),但在非携带者中无显著差异(相对风险:1.0;95%置信区间:0.80 至 1.25)。基于 CYP2C19 基因型状态的交互作用检验具有统计学意义(p=0.013),表明 CYP2C19 基因型改变了疗效。还发现了另外 4 项观察性研究,将它们纳入分析得到了相同的结论(交互作用检验的 p 值<0.001)。
在以 PCI 为主治疗的 CAD 患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛或普拉格雷降低缺血事件的效果主要取决于 CYP2C19 功能丧失型携带者的状态。这些结果支持在开具 P2Y 抑制剂治疗之前进行基因检测。