Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Departments of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Sydney, Australia; Department of Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Oncol. 2021 Jun;32(6):766-777. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Guidelines for pathological evaluation of neoadjuvant specimens and pathological response categories have been developed by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC). As part of the Optimal Neo-adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab (OpACIN-neo) clinical trial of neoadjuvant combination anti-programmed cell death protein 1/anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunotherapy for stage III melanoma, we sought to determine interobserver reproducibility of INMC histopathological assessment principles, identify specific tumour bed histopathological features of immunotherapeutic response that correlated with recurrence and relapse-free survival (RFS) and evaluate proposed INMC pathological response categories for predicting recurrence and RFS.
Clinicopathological characteristics of lymph node dissection specimens of 83 patients enrolled in the OpACIN-neo clinical trial were evaluated. Two methods of assessing histological features of immunotherapeutic response were evaluated: the previously described immune-related pathologic response (irPR) score and our novel immunotherapeutic response score (ITRS). For a subset of cases (n = 29), cellular composition of the tumour bed was analysed by flow cytometry.
There was strong interobserver reproducibility in assessment of pathological response (κ = 0.879) and percentage residual viable melanoma (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.965). The immunotherapeutic response subtype with high fibrosis had the strongest association with lack of recurrence (P = 0.008) and prolonged RFS (P = 0.019). Amongst patients with criteria for pathological non-response (pNR, >50% viable tumour), all who recurred had ≥70% viable melanoma. Higher ITRS and irPR scores correlated with lack of recurrence in the entire cohort (P = 0.002 and P ≤ 0.0001). The number of B lymphocytes was significantly increased in patients with a high fibrosis subtype of treatment response (P = 0.046).
There is strong reproducibility for assessment of pathological response using INMC criteria. Immunotherapeutic response of fibrosis subtype correlated with improved RFS, and may represent a biomarker. Potential B-cell contribution to fibrosis development warrants further study. Reclassification of pNR to a threshold of ≥70% viable melanoma and incorporating additional criteria of <10% fibrosis subtype of response may identify those at highest risk of recurrence, but requires validation.
国际新辅助黑色素瘤联盟(INMC)制定了新辅助标本的病理评估和病理反应分类指南。作为新辅助联合抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1/抗细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关蛋白 4 免疫治疗的 Optimal Neo-adjuvant Combination Scheme of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab(OpACIN-neo)临床试验的一部分,我们旨在确定 INMC 组织病理学评估原则的观察者间可重复性,确定与复发和无复发生存(RFS)相关的免疫治疗反应的特定肿瘤床组织病理学特征,并评估预测复发和 RFS 的 INMC 病理反应分类。
评估了入组 OpACIN-neo 临床试验的 83 例淋巴结清扫标本的临床病理特征。评估了两种评估免疫治疗反应组织学特征的方法:先前描述的免疫相关病理反应(irPR)评分和我们新的免疫治疗反应评分(ITRS)。对于一部分病例(n=29),通过流式细胞术分析肿瘤床的细胞组成。
在评估病理反应(κ=0.879)和残留存活黑色素瘤百分比(组内相关系数=0.965)方面具有很强的观察者间可重复性。纤维化程度较高的免疫治疗反应亚型与无复发(P=0.008)和延长 RFS(P=0.019)的相关性最强。在具有病理无反应(pNR,>50%存活肿瘤)标准的患者中,所有复发的患者均有≥70%存活黑色素瘤。在整个队列中,较高的 ITRS 和 irPR 评分与无复发相关(P=0.002 和 P ≤ 0.0001)。在治疗反应高纤维化亚型的患者中,B 淋巴细胞的数量显著增加(P=0.046)。
使用 INMC 标准评估病理反应具有很强的可重复性。纤维化亚型的免疫治疗反应与 RFS 的改善相关,可能代表一种生物标志物。进一步研究潜在的 B 细胞对纤维化发展的贡献是必要的。将 pNR 重新分类为存活黑色素瘤≥70%的阈值,并纳入反应<10%纤维化亚型的其他标准,可能会识别出复发风险最高的患者,但需要验证。