Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Centre for Vitreo-Retinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India.
NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;41(7):2359-2368. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01789-y. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
To compare the disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) presenting with visual acuity (VA) 6/60 or better in two different health systems.
Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with NVG who presented between January 2016 to January 2018 in 5 tertiary-centres in India and one eye-specialist centre in London (UK) was performed. The baseline characteristics, treatment provisions, and visual outcomes in the India and UK cohorts were compared.
At presentation, 18% (83 of 451) and 22% (59 of 270) of patients with NVG had VA 6/60 or better in India and the UK cohorts, respectively. The aetiologies of NVG were similar with proliferative diabetic retinopathy being the most common cause (60.9%, India; 64.4%, UK; p = 0.38). Previous panretinal photocoagulation was more prevalent in the UK cohort compared to the India cohort (94.9% versus 66.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections per eye was higher in the Indian cohort (1.65 ± 0.97 versus 1.14 ± 1.02 injections; p < 0.001). The number of eyes with closed angles (36.9% India versus 30.5% UK; p = 0.45) and the number of eyes needing glaucoma interventions (52.1% India; 62.7% UK; p = 0.82) were similar in two cohorts. Among glaucoma surgeries, trabeculectomies were more commonly performed in the Indian cohort (23 vs 4; p < 0.001),while glaucoma drainage device surgeries were more prevalent in the UK cohort (18 vs 4 p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 8.4-34.8 India; 24-36 months UK), favourable visual outcomes (vision stable or improved) were similar in both health systems (52.5% in the Indian cohort vs 43.4% in the UK cohort; p = 0.28). On multivariate regression analysis, the need for trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation was associated with worse visual outcomes in both cohorts.
The causes and clinical profile of neovascular glaucoma with presenting visual acuity 6/60 or better in India and the UK were similar. Only up to 50% of eyes achieved favourable visual outcomes with current management protocols in both health systems.
比较两种不同医疗体系中,视力为 6/60 或更佳的新生血管性青光眼(NVG)患者的疾病特征和治疗结果。
回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间,印度 5 家三级中心和英国伦敦的一家眼科中心连续就诊的 NVG 患者的病历。比较了印度和英国队列的基线特征、治疗方案和视力结果。
在就诊时,印度和英国队列中分别有 18%(83/451)和 22%(59/270)的 NVG 患者视力为 6/60 或更佳。NVG 的病因相似,增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变是最常见的病因(60.9%,印度;64.4%,英国;p=0.38)。与印度队列相比,英国队列中接受过全视网膜光凝术的患者更多(94.9%对 66.3%;p<0.001)。印度队列中每只眼接受的抗 VEGF 注射次数更高(平均 1.65±0.97 次,而 1.14±1.02 次;p<0.001)。两组中闭角眼的数量(印度 36.9%,英国 30.5%;p=0.45)和需要青光眼干预的眼数(印度 52.1%,英国 62.7%;p=0.82)相似。在青光眼手术中,印度队列中更常进行小梁切除术(23 例对 4 例;p<0.001),而英国队列中更常进行青光眼引流装置手术(18 例对 4 例;p<0.001)。在中位数为 21 个月(印度 8.4-34.8 个月;英国 24-36 个月)的随访后,两种医疗体系的视力结果均相似(印度队列中视力稳定或改善的比例为 52.5%,英国队列中为 43.4%;p=0.28)。多变量回归分析显示,两种队列中需要经巩膜睫状体光凝术的患者视力结果更差。
印度和英国的 NVG 患者的发病原因和临床特征相似,即使采用现有的治疗方案,也仅有不到 50%的患者获得了良好的视力结果。