• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嘴巴最重要:一项关于狗如何感知无生命物体的功能性磁共振成像研究。

The mouth matters most: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of how dogs perceive inanimate objects.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Comprehensive Pet Therapy, Inc., Sandy Springs, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Neurol. 2021 Aug 1;529(11):2987-2994. doi: 10.1002/cne.25142. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/cne.25142
PMID:33745141
Abstract

The perception and representation of objects in the world are foundational to all animals. The relative importance of objects' physical properties versus how the objects are interacted with continues to be debated. Neural evidence in humans and nonhuman primates suggests animate-inanimate and face-body dimensions of objects are represented in the temporal cortex. However, because primates have opposable thumbs and interact with objects in similar ways, the question remains as to whether this similarity represents the evolution of a common cognitive process or whether it reflects a similarity of physical interaction. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in dogs to test whether the type of interaction affects object processing in an animal that interacts primarily with its mouth. In Study 1, we identified object-processing regions of cortex by having dogs passively view movies of faces and objects. In Study 2, dogs were trained to interact with two new objects with either the mouth or the paw. Then, we measured responsivity in the object regions to the presentation of these objects. Mouth-objects elicited significantly greater activity in object regions than paw-objects. Mouth-objects were also associated with activity in somatosensory cortex, suggesting dogs were anticipating mouthing interactions. These findings suggest that object perception in dogs is affected by how dogs expect to interact with familiar objects.

摘要

对世界上的物体的感知和表现是所有动物的基础。物体的物理属性与物体如何相互作用的相对重要性仍在争论中。人类和非人类灵长类动物的神经证据表明,物体的有生命无生命和脸身体维度在颞叶皮层中得到表示。然而,由于灵长类动物有可对向的拇指并且以相似的方式与物体相互作用,因此仍然存在一个问题,即这种相似性是否代表了共同认知过程的进化,或者是否反映了物理相互作用的相似性。在这里,我们使用功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)在狗中进行测试,以检验互动类型是否会影响主要通过嘴巴与物体互动的动物的物体处理。在研究 1 中,我们通过让狗被动观看人脸和物体的电影来确定大脑皮层的物体处理区域。在研究 2 中,狗被训练用嘴或爪子与两个新物体进行互动。然后,我们测量了这些物体呈现时这些物体区域的反应性。与爪子物体相比,嘴巴物体在物体区域中引起的活动明显更大。嘴巴物体也与躯体感觉皮层的活动有关,这表明狗在预期口部互动。这些发现表明,狗的物体感知受到狗对熟悉物体的预期互动方式的影响。

相似文献

1
The mouth matters most: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of how dogs perceive inanimate objects.嘴巴最重要:一项关于狗如何感知无生命物体的功能性磁共振成像研究。
J Comp Neurol. 2021 Aug 1;529(11):2987-2994. doi: 10.1002/cne.25142. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.通过人类功能磁共振成像和脑磁图解码揭示场景与物体加工之间的相互作用
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 9;37(32):7700-7710. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0582-17.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Unaware Processing of Tools in the Neural System for Object-Directed Action Representation.神经系统中用于对象导向动作表征的工具无意识加工
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;37(44):10712-10724. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1061-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Our Faces in the Dog's Brain: Functional Imaging Reveals Temporal Cortex Activation during Perception of Human Faces.狗脑里的我们的面孔:功能成像揭示了在感知人类面孔过程中颞叶皮质的激活。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149431. eCollection 2016.
5
Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.解析人类视觉皮层中物体形状与物体类别的表征:有生命与无生命的区分
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):680-92. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00924. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
6
Neural time-course of the observation of human and non-human object touch.观察人类和非人类物体触摸的神经时间进程。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):333-41. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss142. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
7
Functional mapping of the somatosensory cortex using noninvasive fMRI and touch in awake dogs.使用无创 fMRI 和触摸在清醒的狗身上进行躯体感觉皮层的功能映射。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Jun;229(5):1193-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02798-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
8
Active learning of novel sound-producing objects: motor reactivation and enhancement of visuo-motor connectivity.主动学习新的发声物体:运动再激活和增强视动连通性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Feb;25(2):203-18. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00284. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
9
Differential involvement of somatosensory and interoceptive cortices during the observation of affective touch.在观察情感触摸时,躯体感觉和内脏感觉皮质的差异参与。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1808-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21551. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
10
Whole brain mapping of somatosensory responses in awake marmosets investigated with ultra-high-field fMRI.清醒恒河猴超高频 fMRI 研究体感反应的全脑映射
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Dec 1;124(6):1900-1913. doi: 10.1152/jn.00480.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Tracking in Dogs: Achievements and Challenges.犬类的眼动追踪:成就与挑战。
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2023;18:33-58. doi: 10.3819/CCBR.2023.180005.
2
Investigating belief understanding in children in a nonverbal ambiguous displacement and communication setting.在非言语模糊置换和交流情境中研究儿童的信念理解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Apr;240:105830. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105830. Epub 2023 Dec 16.