Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1797-1804. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.232. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
Radiological pure-solid lung cancer denotes a high invasive nature compared to one that is part-solid. Mediastinal lymph nodal dissection (mLND) is a standard surgical procedure for nodal management in lung cancer surgery, however, the prognostic impact of the extent of mLND in pure-solid lung cancer is still unknown.
We reviewed 459 patients with c-stage I radiological pure-solid lung cancer that underwent pulmonary lobectomy with mLND. Pure-solid was defined as a tumor showing only a consolidation without any ground glass opacity. The extent of mLND was classified into lobe-specific (L-mLND) and systematic (S-mLND). Prognostic significance of mLND was assessed by a multivariable analysis using propensity-score matching. Survivals were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods using log-rank test.
Pathological nodal metastasis was found in 127 (27.6%) patients (hilar: 52 (11.3%), mediastinal: 75 (16.3%)). L-mLND was performed in 278 (61%) patients. A multivariable analysis did not show the survival difference for the extent of mLND (p = 0.266). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between S-mLND and L-mLND (74.3% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.712), which was similar even in 114 propensity-score matched pairs (78.8% vs. 79.9%, p = 0.665). While S-mLND showed a trend for survival benefit compared to L-mLND provided that the tumor showed higher standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (5y-OS: 70.0% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.093).
Prognostic impact of L-mLND was similar to S-mLND in c-stage I radiological pure-solid lung cancers in the propensity-score matched comparison. Among them, higher SUVmax value might be a promising indicator to decide the extent of mediastinal lymphadenectomy.
与部分实性肺癌相比,影像学纯实性肺癌具有更高的侵袭性。纵隔淋巴结清扫术(mLND)是肺癌手术中淋巴结管理的标准手术程序,然而,纯实性肺癌中 mLND 范围的预后影响仍不清楚。
我们回顾了 459 例接受肺叶切除术和 mLND 的 c 期 I 影像学纯实性肺癌患者。纯实性定义为仅表现为实变而无任何磨玻璃样混浊的肿瘤。mLND 的范围分为肺叶特异性(L-mLND)和系统性(S-mLND)。通过倾向评分匹配的多变量分析评估 mLND 的预后意义。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验计算生存率。
127 例(27.6%)患者发现病理淋巴结转移(肺门:52 例(11.3%),纵隔:75 例(16.3%))。278 例(61%)患者行 L-mLND。多变量分析显示 mLND 范围的生存差异无统计学意义(p=0.266)。S-mLND 和 L-mLND 的 5 年总生存率(OS)无显著差异(74.3% vs. 72.7%,p=0.712),即使在 114 对倾向评分匹配的患者中也是如此(78.8% vs. 79.9%,p=0.665)。虽然 S-mLND 与 L-mLND 相比具有生存获益的趋势,但前提是肿瘤显示出更高的标准化摄取值(SUVmax)(5y-OS:59.2% vs. 70.0%,p=0.093)。
在倾向评分匹配比较中,c 期 I 影像学纯实性肺癌中 L-mLND 的预后影响与 S-mLND 相似。其中,较高的 SUVmax 值可能是决定纵隔淋巴结清扫范围的有前途的指标。