PRO-Mano, Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation Center, Treviso, Italy Hand Surgery Unit, Ospedale Koelliker, Torino.
Rimini Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation Center, Rimini.
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jun;37(6):1800-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
To evaluate the accuracy of the trampoline and hook tests, used in the arthroscopic assessment of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears compared with arthroscopic direct visualization of the radiocarpal joint (RCJ) and of the distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ).
In total, 135 patients (97 male, 38 female, mean age 43.5 years) were divided into 2 groups: (1) 80 patients with chronic ulnar-sided wrist pain and positive fovea sign and (2) 55 patients with other complaints. TFCC was assessed by RCJ and DRUJ arthroscopy and by the trampoline and hook tests to detect rupture of distal and proximal components of the TFCC. Accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and likelihood ratio of the 2 diagnostic methods were measured and compared, using RCJ and DRUJ arthroscopy as reference.
The trampoline and the hook tests showed an overall accuracy of 70.37% and 86.67%, respectively. The accuracy of the trampoline test was similar for distal (69%), proximal (66%), and complete (73%) TFCC tears. The hook test was more accurate when evaluating proximal (97%) and complete (98%) tears, rather than distal lesions (75%). Sensitivity for the trampoline and hook tests was 75.00% and 0.00% (P < .001) for distal tears and 78.85% and 100.00% (P < .001) and 58.33% and 100.00% (P < .001) for complete or isolated proximal tears, respectively. Specificity for the trampoline and hook tests was 67.27% and 96.36% (P < .001) respectively.
The trampoline and hook tests can assure accurate diagnosis of peripheral TFCC tear. The hook test shows greater specificity and sensitivity to recognize foveal TFCC tears. Values of positive likelihood ratio suggest a greater probability to detect foveal laceration of peripheral TFCC for the hook test than for the trampoline test. These findings suggest that DRUJ arthroscopy is not necessary to confirm foveal incompetence of the TFCC, if the hook test is positive.
Level II, retrospective diagnostic trial.
评估在关节镜评估三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)撕裂中使用蹦床和钩试验的准确性,与关节镜直接观察桡腕关节(RCJ)和桡尺远侧关节(DRUJ)相比。
共纳入 135 名患者(97 名男性,38 名女性,平均年龄 43.5 岁),分为 2 组:(1)80 名慢性尺侧腕痛和阳性窝征患者;(2)55 名其他症状患者。通过 RCJ 和 DRUJ 关节镜以及蹦床和钩试验评估 TFCC,以检测 TFCC 远端和近端成分的破裂。使用 RCJ 和 DRUJ 关节镜作为参考,测量和比较两种诊断方法的准确性、特异性、敏感性和似然比。
蹦床和钩试验的总体准确性分别为 70.37%和 86.67%。蹦床试验对远端(69%)、近端(66%)和完全(73%)TFCC 撕裂的准确性相似。钩试验在评估近端(97%)和完全(98%)撕裂时更准确,而不是评估远端病变(75%)。对于远端撕裂,蹦床和钩试验的敏感性分别为 75.00%和 0.00%(P<0.001);对于完全或单纯近端撕裂,敏感性分别为 78.85%和 100.00%(P<0.001)和 58.33%和 100.00%(P<0.001)。蹦床和钩试验的特异性分别为 67.27%和 96.36%(P<0.001)。
蹦床和钩试验可确保准确诊断外周 TFCC 撕裂。钩试验对识别窝状 TFCC 撕裂具有更高的特异性和敏感性。阳性似然比的值表明,钩试验比蹦床试验更有可能检测到外周 TFCC 的窝状撕裂。这些发现表明,如果钩试验阳性,则无需进行 DRUJ 关节镜检查来确认 TFCC 窝状功能不全。
II 级,回顾性诊断试验。