Colditz Jason B, Tulikangas Megan C, Sidani Jaime E, Dodson Zan M, Woods Michelle S, James A Everette, Primack Brian A
Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bureau of Public Policy and Community Relations, Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tob Use Insights. 2021 Feb 22;14:1179173X20927389. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20927389. eCollection 2021.
The growing use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among adolescents is a public health concern. Taxation of these products is a viable approach to reduce ENDS use, particularly among adolescents. Opponents of taxation posit that it puts specialty retailers (ie, vape shops) out of business, thereby reducing availability of ENDS for adult smokers seeking harm reduction. Pennsylvania enacted substantial ENDS taxes in October 2016. This study sought to examine (1) the prevalence of Pennsylvania vape shops before and after ENDS taxes were enacted and (2) ENDS retail licensing compliance among vape shops.
We employed standardized searches for vape shops in Pennsylvania on the Yelp business-listing platform a month prior to and for 18 consecutive months following the imposition of ENDS taxes. We then compared listings to a public database of ENDS-related retail licenses to determine compliance status.
The number of listed vape shops increased in a linear fashion by a magnitude of 23%. In addition, when we compared a final listing of retailers to data from the state tax authority, we found roughly a quarter (22%-29%) of vape shops to be noncompliant with maintaining a valid ENDS retail license.
Overall, ENDS taxation in Pennsylvania has not appeared to reduce prevalence of vape shops as anticipated. However, stricter enforcement of the tax law is necessary to ensure compliance among retailers. These findings have implications for implementation and enforcement of ENDS tax policy nationwide, including states that currently lack such policies.
青少年中电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的使用日益增加,这是一个公共卫生问题。对这些产品征税是减少ENDS使用的一种可行方法,特别是在青少年中。征税的反对者认为,这会使特色零售商(即电子烟商店)倒闭,从而减少寻求降低危害的成年吸烟者获得ENDS的机会。宾夕法尼亚州于2016年10月颁布了大幅的ENDS税。本研究旨在调查(1)宾夕法尼亚州电子烟商店在ENDS税颁布前后的流行情况,以及(2)电子烟商店在ENDS零售许可方面的合规情况。
我们在实施ENDS税之前一个月以及之后连续18个月,在Yelp商业列表平台上对宾夕法尼亚州的电子烟商店进行标准化搜索。然后,我们将列表与ENDS相关零售许可证的公共数据库进行比较,以确定合规状态。
列出的电子烟商店数量以线性方式增加了23%。此外,当我们将零售商的最终列表与州税务机关的数据进行比较时,我们发现大约四分之一(22%-29%)的电子烟商店未遵守持有有效的ENDS零售许可证的规定。
总体而言,宾夕法尼亚州的ENDS税似乎并未如预期那样降低电子烟商店的流行率。然而,有必要更严格地执行税法以确保零售商合规。这些发现对全国范围内ENDS税收政策的实施和执行具有启示意义,包括目前缺乏此类政策的州。