Suppr超能文献

宾夕法尼亚州电子烟商店的扩散与违规行为:一项征税前后的分析。

Vape Shop Proliferation and Noncompliance in Pennsylvania: A Pre- and Post-tax Analysis.

作者信息

Colditz Jason B, Tulikangas Megan C, Sidani Jaime E, Dodson Zan M, Woods Michelle S, James A Everette, Primack Brian A

机构信息

Center for Research on Media, Technology, and Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Bureau of Public Policy and Community Relations, Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Tob Use Insights. 2021 Feb 22;14:1179173X20927389. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20927389. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among adolescents is a public health concern. Taxation of these products is a viable approach to reduce ENDS use, particularly among adolescents. Opponents of taxation posit that it puts specialty retailers (ie, vape shops) out of business, thereby reducing availability of ENDS for adult smokers seeking harm reduction. Pennsylvania enacted substantial ENDS taxes in October 2016. This study sought to examine (1) the prevalence of Pennsylvania vape shops before and after ENDS taxes were enacted and (2) ENDS retail licensing compliance among vape shops.

METHODS

We employed standardized searches for vape shops in Pennsylvania on the Yelp business-listing platform a month prior to and for 18 consecutive months following the imposition of ENDS taxes. We then compared listings to a public database of ENDS-related retail licenses to determine compliance status.

RESULTS

The number of listed vape shops increased in a linear fashion by a magnitude of 23%. In addition, when we compared a final listing of retailers to data from the state tax authority, we found roughly a quarter (22%-29%) of vape shops to be noncompliant with maintaining a valid ENDS retail license.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ENDS taxation in Pennsylvania has not appeared to reduce prevalence of vape shops as anticipated. However, stricter enforcement of the tax law is necessary to ensure compliance among retailers. These findings have implications for implementation and enforcement of ENDS tax policy nationwide, including states that currently lack such policies.

摘要

背景

青少年中电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的使用日益增加,这是一个公共卫生问题。对这些产品征税是减少ENDS使用的一种可行方法,特别是在青少年中。征税的反对者认为,这会使特色零售商(即电子烟商店)倒闭,从而减少寻求降低危害的成年吸烟者获得ENDS的机会。宾夕法尼亚州于2016年10月颁布了大幅的ENDS税。本研究旨在调查(1)宾夕法尼亚州电子烟商店在ENDS税颁布前后的流行情况,以及(2)电子烟商店在ENDS零售许可方面的合规情况。

方法

我们在实施ENDS税之前一个月以及之后连续18个月,在Yelp商业列表平台上对宾夕法尼亚州的电子烟商店进行标准化搜索。然后,我们将列表与ENDS相关零售许可证的公共数据库进行比较,以确定合规状态。

结果

列出的电子烟商店数量以线性方式增加了23%。此外,当我们将零售商的最终列表与州税务机关的数据进行比较时,我们发现大约四分之一(22%-29%)的电子烟商店未遵守持有有效的ENDS零售许可证的规定。

结论

总体而言,宾夕法尼亚州的ENDS税似乎并未如预期那样降低电子烟商店的流行率。然而,有必要更严格地执行税法以确保零售商合规。这些发现对全国范围内ENDS税收政策的实施和执行具有启示意义,包括目前缺乏此类政策的州。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a52/7905483/c28313b1194a/10.1177_1179173X20927389-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Vape Shop Proliferation and Noncompliance in Pennsylvania: A Pre- and Post-tax Analysis.
Tob Use Insights. 2021 Feb 22;14:1179173X20927389. doi: 10.1177/1179173X20927389. eCollection 2021.
2
Characterizing California licensure status and tobacco user experience with adverse events using Yelp data.
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jan 27;26:101720. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101720. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Identification of Vape Shops in Two North Carolina Counties: An Approach for States without Retailer Licensing.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Oct 27;13(11):1050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111050.
6
An Assessment of Vape Shop Products in California before and after Implementation of FDA and State Regulations.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315827.
7
School proximity and census tract correlates of e-cigarette specialty retail outlets (vape shops) in central Texas.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Mar 23;18:101079. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101079. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Kratom availability in California vape shops.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 23;35:102380. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102380. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Predictors of Vape Shops Going out of Business in Southern California.
Tob Regul Sci. 2020 May;6(3):187-195. doi: 10.18001/trs.6.3.3.
10
Consumers' perceptions of vape shops in Southern California: an analysis of online Yelp reviews.
Tob Induc Dis. 2014 Nov 28;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12971-014-0022-7. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Vaping-Induced Acute Lung Injury.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):960-962. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1912032. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
JUUL: Spreading Online and Offline.
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Nov;63(5):582-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.002.
5
Electronic Cigarette Sales in the United States, 2013-2017.
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1379-1380. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10488.
7
Vaping versus JUULing: how the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL transformed the US retail e-cigarette market.
Tob Control. 2019 Mar;28(2):146-151. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054382. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Online data to contextualize waterpipe tobacco smoking establishments surrounding large US universities.
Health Informatics J. 2019 Dec;25(4):1314-1324. doi: 10.1177/1460458217754242. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Price elasticity of demand of non-cigarette tobacco products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):689-695. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054056. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验