• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激-反应相容性效应发生中的注意因素。

Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects.

作者信息

Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman K M

机构信息

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(3):435-44. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90096-6.

DOI:10.1016/0028-3932(88)90096-6
PMID:3374802
Abstract

Two major hypotheses have been advanced to account for stimulus-response compatibility effects in the situation in which the location of the target is irrelevant for choosing the correct response. According to the attentional hypothesis, compatibility effects reflect a response bias, favoring the effector on the same side as the stimulus. According to the coding hypothesis, compatibility effects result from a correspondence between the spatial codes of the stimulus and effector. In the present study, two components of attention--selective attention and intention--were independently manipulated by providing selective preparatory information before onset of a target stimulus. Attentional information indicated where the target stimulus would occur; intentional information indicated which hand would have to be used to respond. Compatibility effects were observed only in the condition in which intentional information, but no attentional information, was provided. These findings support the attentional hypothesis and indicate that a specific aspect of attention, namely a selective readiness to respond to the stimulus, is a necessary condition for compatibility effects to occur.

摘要

在目标位置与选择正确反应无关的情况下,为了解释刺激-反应兼容性效应,人们提出了两种主要假说。根据注意假说,兼容性效应反映了一种反应偏向,即偏向于与刺激同侧的效应器。根据编码假说,兼容性效应源于刺激和效应器的空间编码之间的对应关系。在本研究中,通过在目标刺激出现之前提供选择性准备信息,对注意的两个成分——选择性注意和意图——进行了独立操纵。注意信息表明目标刺激将出现在何处;意图信息表明必须用哪只手做出反应。兼容性效应仅在提供了意图信息但未提供注意信息的条件下被观察到。这些发现支持了注意假说,并表明注意的一个特定方面,即对刺激做出反应的选择性准备状态,是兼容性效应发生的必要条件。

相似文献

1
Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects.刺激-反应相容性效应发生中的注意因素。
Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(3):435-44. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90096-6.
2
Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.身体中线同侧的空间兼容性效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Oct;8(5):664-73. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.5.664.
3
Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.注意力聚焦与空间刺激-反应兼容性。
Psychol Res. 1991;53(2):127-35. doi: 10.1007/BF01371820.
4
Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.受刺激眼睛与反应位置之间的刺激-反应兼容性:对西蒙效应注意理论的启示。
Psychol Res. 2003 Nov;67(4):240-3. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0131-z. Epub 2003 May 22.
5
Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.“是-否”任务中的刺激-反应相容性效应:维度重叠解释
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Nov;61(8):1613-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03213122.
6
Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony.手部半空间空间兼容性、预线索化和刺激开始异步性。
Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):170-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00419704.
7
Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks.注意力控制中的半球不对称性:对感觉运动任务中手偏好的影响。
Brain Cogn. 1990 Sep;14(1):70-80. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90061-r.
8
Spatial S-R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus-response relationship.具有正交刺激-反应关系的空间刺激-反应兼容性
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Mar;45(3):215-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03210700.
9
A Direct Comparison of Spatial Attention and Stimulus-Response Compatibility between Mice and Humans.小鼠与人类的空间注意力与刺激-反应相容性的直接比较。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr 1;33(5):771-783. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01681.
10
Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.逆转可供性效应:在可抓握物体图像中观察到的负刺激-反应兼容性。
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:287-91. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0708-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action.前提示对感知和动作中的空间注意的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1840-1846. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1397-2.
2
Response Preparation, Response Conflict, and the Effects of Irrelevant Flanker Stimuli.反应准备、反应冲突及无关侧翼刺激的影响
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):70-82. doi: 10.5709/acp-0208-3. eCollection 2017.
3
Endogenous attention modulates attentional and motor interference from distractors: evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological results.
内源性注意调节来自干扰物的注意和运动干扰:行为和电生理结果的证据。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 20;6:132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00132. eCollection 2015.
4
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
5
Nicotine modulation of information processing is not limited to input (attention) but extends to output (intention).尼古丁对信息处理的调节不仅限于输入(注意力),还延伸到输出(意图)。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 May;209(4):291-302. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1788-9. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
6
Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.空间 Stroop 与空间定向:启动与结束线索的作用。
Psychol Res. 2010 May;74(3):277-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0253-z. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
7
The role of spatial attention and other processes on the magnitude and time course of cueing effects.空间注意力及其他过程在提示效应的大小和时间进程上所起的作用。
Cogn Process. 2005 Jun;6(2):98-116. doi: 10.1007/s10339-004-0038-7. Epub 2005 Jan 6.
8
Endogenous orienting modulates the Simon effect: critical factors in experimental design.内源性定向调节西蒙效应:实验设计中的关键因素。
Psychol Res. 2008 May;72(3):261-72. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0110-x. Epub 2007 Mar 10.
9
Intentional pre-cueing does not influence the Simon effect.有意预提示不会影响西蒙效应。
Psychol Res. 2006 Mar;70(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0193-6. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
10
What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(3):325-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1792-y. Epub 2004 Jan 27.