Pohjonen Markus, Savolainen Sarianna, Arokoski Jari, Shulga Anastasia
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
HUS Medical Imaging Center, BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Feb 20;6:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.01.004. eCollection 2021.
Earlier studies have shown how chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have benefitted from paired associative stimulation (PAS), consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since high-frequency PNS is poorly characterized, its therapeutic effect without TMS should be evaluated. We tested the effect of PNS combined with motor imagery in chronic SCI patients using the same parameters of PNS as in earlier PAS-based studies that also used TMS.
Five patients with chronic incomplete SCI and tetraplegia received a 6-week treatment of PNS combined with motor imagery to the weaker upper limb. Patients were evaluated with Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), hand function tests (Box and block, grip and pinch strength dynamometry), and spasticity.
There was no significant change in hand function tests or spasticity. MMT values improved significantly immediately after the PNS period (0.59 ± 0.17, p = 0.043) and in the 1-month follow-up visit (0.87 ± 0.18, p = 0.043). However, improvement of MMT values was weaker than in chronic tetraplegic patients in a corresponding PAS study that used identical PNS stimulation but also included the TMS component omitted here (Tolmacheva et al., 2019a, Clin Neurophysiol Pract).
The lack of effect on functional hand tests with the protocol presented here suggests that the synergistic effect of PNS and TMS components is essential for the full therapeutic effect previously observed with PAS intervention. The moderate improvement of the MMT score suggests the possible usefulness of PNS and motor imagery for some of those tetraplegic SCI patients who have contraindications to TMS.
These results add to the understanding of the PAS therapeutic mechanism by highlighting the importance of dual stimulation for achieving the full therapeutic effect of long-term PAS with a high-frequency PNS component.
早期研究表明,慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者如何从配对联想刺激(PAS)中获益,PAS由高频外周神经刺激(PNS)和高强度经颅磁刺激(TMS)组成。由于高频PNS的特征描述不足,应评估其在无TMS情况下的治疗效果。我们使用与早期基于PAS且也使用TMS的研究中相同的PNS参数,测试了PNS联合运动想象对慢性SCI患者的影响。
五名慢性不完全性SCI和四肢瘫痪患者接受了为期6周的PNS联合对较弱上肢进行运动想象的治疗。通过徒手肌力测试(MMT)、手部功能测试(箱块测试、握力和捏力测力计)以及痉挛评估对患者进行评估。
手部功能测试或痉挛情况无显著变化。PNS治疗期结束后,MMT值立即显著改善(0.59±0.17,p = 0.043),在1个月的随访中也显著改善(0.87±0.18,p = 0.043)。然而,在一项相应的PAS研究中,使用相同的PNS刺激,但还包括此处省略的TMS成分,慢性四肢瘫痪患者的MMT值改善情况比本研究更强(Tolmacheva等人,2019a,《临床神经生理学实践》)。
本文所采用方案对功能性手部测试无效果,这表明PNS和TMS成分的协同作用对于先前PAS干预所观察到的完全治疗效果至关重要。MMT评分的适度改善表明,对于一些有TMS禁忌证的四肢瘫痪SCI患者,PNS和运动想象可能有用。
这些结果通过强调双重刺激对于实现具有高频PNS成分的长期PAS的完全治疗效果的重要性,增进了对PAS治疗机制的理解。