Suppr超能文献

机械通气犬猫的营养支持提供情况审核。

Audit of the provision of nutritional support to mechanically ventilated dogs and cats.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 May;31(3):387-395. doi: 10.1111/vec.13060. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of enteral and parenteral nutrition in a population of mechanically ventilated cats and dogs, identify factors associated with implementation of nutrition, and assess the frequency of nutritional support within 72 hours of absent caloric intake.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center audit from June 2013 to June 2016.

SETTING

ICU of a veterinary university teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Fifty-eight animals (50 dogs, 8 cats) that underwent mechanical ventilation for ≥6 hours with complete medical records.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data collected included nutritional provision, time to initiation of nutrition, period of absent caloric intake, percentage of caloric intake obtained, and possible factors contributing to the delay or failure to implement nutrition. Thirty-one percent of patients (dogs 16/50, 32%; cats 2/8, 25%) received nutritional support during mechanical ventilation with all but 2 dogs receiving parenteral nutrition. Of those patients that did not receive nutrition (dogs 34/50, 68%; cats 6/8, 75%), documented contraindications or notations within the medical record for its omission were present in 16 of 34 dogs (47%) and 4 of 6 cats (66.7%). Thirteen animals (11 dogs, 2 cats) had >72 hours of absent caloric intake with only a small number of these receiving nutrition (dogs 4/11, 36.4%; cats 0/2, 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 18 of 58 (31%) mechanically ventilated dogs and cats at our institution received nutritional support, and the majority of these were fed parenterally (16/18, 88.9%). For animals that did not receive nutrition, there was no clear reason for its absence in many cases. Animals with absent caloric intake >72 hours had poor implementation of nutritional support in contrast to current guidelines. A repeat audit after implementing changes to institutional protocols for nutritional provision is warranted to assess the impact on morbidity and mortality.

摘要

目的

评估肠内和肠外营养在机械通气的猫和狗群体中的使用情况,确定与营养实施相关的因素,并评估在无热量摄入的 72 小时内进行营养支持的频率。

设计

2013 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月的回顾性单中心审计。

地点

兽医大学教学医院的 ICU。

动物

58 只接受机械通气≥6 小时且病历完整的动物(50 只狗,8 只猫)。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

收集的数据包括营养供给、营养开始时间、无热量摄入时间、获得的热量摄入百分比以及可能导致延迟或未能实施营养的因素。31%的患者(狗 16/50,32%;猫 2/8,25%)在机械通气期间接受了营养支持,除 2 只狗外,其余均接受了肠外营养。在未接受营养的患者中(狗 34/50,68%;猫 6/8,75%),16 只狗(47%)和 4 只猫(66.7%)的病历中有记录的禁忌症或注明了不给予营养的原因。13 只动物(11 只狗,2 只猫)有超过 72 小时的无热量摄入,但只有少数动物接受了营养(狗 4/11,36.4%;猫 0/2,0%)。

结论

我们机构只有 18 只(31%)机械通气的狗和猫接受了营养支持,其中大多数是通过肠外途径给予的(16/18,88.9%)。对于未接受营养的动物,在许多情况下,其缺失的原因并不明确。与目前的指南相比,无热量摄入超过 72 小时的动物的营养支持实施情况较差。在实施营养供给机构方案的改变后进行重复审核,以评估其对发病率和死亡率的影响是有必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验