School of Nursing, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Psychooncology. 2021 Jul;30(7):1129-1136. doi: 10.1002/pon.5663. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Many breast cancer survivors (BCSs) recover from the negative sequelae of cancer treatment. However, some report persistent and disruptive distress well into disease-free survivorship. More information is needed on the predictors of distress in this growing population of BCS, including the role of avoidant coping, or attempts to avoid thoughts, feelings, and reminders of cancer, in mediating the relationship between distress and psychological, physical, and social domains of well-being.
In a large cross-sectional study, BCS (n = 1,127), who were 3 to 8 years post-diagnosis, completed a survey assessing demographic characteristics, medical history, distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms), avoidant coping, and physical (fatigue), psychological (fear of recurrence, attention, body image), and social (social support from a partner, social constraints from a partner) well-being. Multiple mediation analyses were conducted to determine if avoidant coping mediated the relationship between each distress variable (anxiety and depressive symptoms) and each well-being (fear of recurrence, attention, body image, fatigue, social support, and social constraints) variable.
In all six mediation models, avoidant coping significantly (p < 0.001) mediated the relationship between each well-being variable (fear of recurrence, attention, body image, fatigue, social support, and social constraints) and each distress indicator (depression and anxiety). Avoidant coping mediated 19%-54% of the effects of the contributing factors on the distress variables.
Avoidant coping may indicate risk for, or presence of, distress among BCS. Interventions to reduce distress may benefit from addressing avoidant coping styles.
许多乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)从癌症治疗的负面后果中恢复过来。然而,一些人报告说,在无疾病存活期间,持续存在且具有破坏性的困扰。对于这个不断增长的 BCS 人群,需要更多关于困扰的预测因素的信息,包括回避应对的作用,即试图避免与癌症相关的想法、感受和提醒,以调节困扰与心理、身体和社会幸福感之间的关系。
在一项大型横断面研究中,BCS(n=1127)在诊断后 3 至 8 年完成了一项调查,评估了人口统计学特征、病史、困扰(焦虑和抑郁症状)、回避应对以及身体(疲劳)、心理(复发恐惧、注意力、身体形象)和社会(来自伴侣的社会支持、来自伴侣的社会限制)幸福感。进行了多项中介分析,以确定回避应对是否在每个困扰变量(焦虑和抑郁症状)与每个幸福感变量(复发恐惧、注意力、身体形象、疲劳、社会支持和社会限制)之间的关系中起中介作用。
在所有六个中介模型中,回避应对显著(p<0.001)中介了每个幸福感变量(复发恐惧、注意力、身体形象、疲劳、社会支持和社会限制)与每个困扰指标(抑郁和焦虑)之间的关系。回避应对在促成因素对困扰变量的影响中占 19%-54%。
回避应对可能表明 BCS 存在或存在困扰。减少困扰的干预措施可能受益于解决回避应对方式。