Gerontology Research Center, and Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Klinik Healthcare Solutions Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Sep;35(9):1257-1265. doi: 10.1177/02692155211001672. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
To examine whether pre-admission community mobility explains the effects of a rehabilitation program on physical performance and activity in older adults recently discharged from hospital.
A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Home and community.
Community-dwelling adults aged ⩾60 years recovering from a lower limb or back injury, surgery or other disorder who were randomized to a rehabilitation ( = 59) or standard care control ( = 58) group. They were further classified into subgroups that were not planned a priori: (1) mild, (2) moderate, or (3) severe pre-admission restrictions in community mobility.
The 6-month intervention consisted of a motivational interview, goal attainment process, guidance for safe walking, a progressive home exercise program, physical activity counselling, and standard care.
Physical performance was measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery and physical activity with accelerometers and self-reports. Data were analysed by generalized estimating equation models with the interactions of intervention, time, and subgroup.
Rehabilitation improved physical performance more in the intervention ( = 30) than in the control group ( = 28) among participants with moderate mobility restriction: score of the Short Physical Performance Battery was 4.4 ± 2.3 and 4.2 ± 2.2 at baseline, and 7.3 ± 2.6 and 5.8 ± 2.9 at 6 months in the intervention and control group, respectively (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 3.1). Rehabilitation did not increase accelerometer-based physical activity in the aforementioned subgroup and did not benefit those with either mild or severe mobility restrictions.
Pre-admission mobility may determine the response to the largely counselling-based rehabilitation program.
研究老年人在出院后接受康复计划治疗时,其身体机能和活动能力的变化是否与入院前的社区移动能力有关。
随机对照试验的二次分析。
家庭和社区。
年龄在 60 岁以上、因下肢或背部受伤、手术或其他疾病而在社区中生活的成年人,他们被随机分配到康复组(n=59)或标准护理对照组(n=58)。他们进一步分为事先未计划的亚组:(1)轻度、(2)中度或(3)严重入院前社区移动受限。
为期 6 个月的干预措施包括一次动机访谈、目标实现过程、安全行走指导、渐进式家庭锻炼计划、身体活动咨询和标准护理。
身体机能通过短体适能电池测试进行评估,身体活动通过加速度计和自我报告进行评估。数据分析采用广义估计方程模型,并对干预、时间和亚组的相互作用进行分析。
在中移动受限的参与者中,康复组(n=30)的干预效果明显优于对照组(n=28):短体适能电池测试的评分在基线时分别为 4.4±2.3 和 4.2±2.2,6 个月时分别为 7.3±2.6 和 5.8±2.9,干预组的评分增加了 1.6 分,95%置信区间为 0.2 至 3.1。在上述亚组中,康复并没有增加基于加速度计的身体活动,也没有使轻度或重度移动受限的参与者受益。
入院前的移动能力可能决定了对以咨询为主的康复计划的反应。